Hey, Mom! The Explanation.

Here's the permanent dedicated link to my first Hey, Mom! post and the explanation of the feature it contains.

Saturday, May 1, 2021

A Sense of Doubt blog post #2265 - MayDay! Mayday! The End of Cheeseburgers - HODGE PODGE THE FIRST OF MAY - 2105.01

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/01/meat-politics-226342
A Sense of Doubt blog post #2265 - MayDay! Mayday! The End of Cheeseburgers - HODGE PODGE THE FIRST OF MAY - 2105.01

Not much to say about this week's HODGE PODGE just want to post it.

Outlawing cheeseburgers??

Like the Mr. Potato Head, Dr. Seuss, and other stupidities of 2021 so far, 

STUPID.



















Moby: A Vegan World Would Have No Pandemics???
11,294 views•Apr 19, 2021


https://www.patreon.com/posts/moby-vegan-world-50225993

Moby: A Vegan World Would Have No Pandemics???

Transcript:

Remember Moby? Bald, got famous selling all his songs to car commercials, got more famous for claiming he dated Natalie Portman when, according to Portman, “my recollection is a much older man being creepy with me when I just had graduated high school”? Yeah, Moby! Well did you know that he’s also a vegan? If you didn’t know that I assume it’s because you forced him out of your memory, possibly with the help of drugs or alcohol, because he’s definitely one of those vegans. Like, he’s the vegan from the joke about vegans. You know the one.

And recently Moby, in all his brilliance, took a break from making up relationships with actors 15 years his junior to gift us with this completely inane thought: “A reminder: in a vegan world there would be no pandemics. 100% of pandemics are zoonotic in origin. #veganforlife”

I see a lot of wrong things in a day -- it’s my job, I seek out wrong things and then I correct them. Or mock them. But this takes the wrong cake. This is the wrongest thing I’ve seen in DAYS.

And it’s not just Moby who thinks this! This Prince Valiant looking mother fucker with half a million followers on Instagram has been saying the same thing and getting way too little pushback.

Before we dig in, let me declare my conflicts of interest: first of all, I did buy “Play” when it came out. I was young and foolish. I apologize. Also, I am not vegan, but I don’t eat most animals. I only eat things that I have, in the past, personally murdered. Vegetables? Check. Fruits? Check. Insects? Absolutely. Crabs? Yes, they are the insects of the sea. Pigs? No way. Too smart and cute, I couldn’t do it. Cephalopods? Ditto. Please note that this does NOT include a “me or them” situation. Like if a squid was coming at me with a knife then I would have no moral qualms killing it. Don’t kid yourself, Jimmy, if a cow ever got the chance he’d eat you and everyone you care about.

Anyway so I’m not vegan but I am pescetarian, or flexatarian, or whatever you want to call someone who doesn’t eat the things most Americans tend to eat. And as I’ve discussed in the past on this very channel, I do think the data shows us that if more people reduced the amount of meat they ate, the world would be better off in terms of global warming. I think the science on health benefits to vegetarian and veganism is less conclusive but mostly because humanity has used our legendary brains to invent ways to be extremely unhealthy on vegan and vegetarian diets. Thanks, double stuffed oreos and beer.

While I think there’s a pretty clear scientific consensus that reducing meat consumption will benefit the environment, let’s talk about whether or not everyone going vegan would mean no more pandemics.

For this thought experiment, we will have to assume the world is very different to what it is, because the fact of the matter is that every human on earth can NOT go vegan. I mean, without starving to death. There are entire cultures that subsist on meat by necessity -- it’s kind of tough to grow tofu in the Arctic circle, for instance. Being a vegan is a massive privilege, as it requires having ample access to products made without animals. I could easily go vegan if I wanted to -- well, not “easily” due to my crippling addiction to cheese, but I have the resources to do it -- but most humans do not.

But let’s set that aside. If we could snap our fingers and make the entire world wake up vegan, would we no longer experience pandemics? No. Sorry.

Let’s start with COVID-19. Scientists still aren’t entirely sure about the exact origin of this pandemic, but the evidence is currently leaning heavily toward blaming markets in China that sold both living and dead wild animals. The leaders of the “Intellectual Dark Web” still think COVID-19 escaped from a lab, but the Intellectual Dark Web is a bunch of morons, which you know because they believe stupid conspiracy theories and call themselves the Intellectual Dark Web.

But real scientists suspect that it started in bats -- bats are very good at carrying diseases because they have completely bonkers immune systems that allow them to catch viruses that end up not really bothering them that much, so they can still go about their flappy, bitey business. To use another Simpsons reference, they have Three Stooges Syndrome like Mr. Burns. But for real, if you wanna know more about the incredibly bat immune system, read that Washington Post article because it is fascinating. Like, the way their immune system controls diseases without completely ridding their bodies of them might even be connected to the reason they can fly. Weird!

So after carefully examining SARS-CoV-2 genomes, scientists think that it was hanging out in bats, and that bats then passed it on to some as-yet unknown intermediary species, which may have been sold at that animal market in Wuhan (or possibly at a farm that supplied animals to the market), where it made one more leap into humans. I nearly said “final leap” but that wouldn’t be necessarily true since it probably also jumped from humans to cats and dogs after that.

One note about that unknown intermediary species: despite a lot of racist “jokes” about how this happened because Chinese people eat weird shit, Nature reports that “Chinese researchers collected nearly 1,000 samples from the Huanan market in early 2020, swabbing doors, rubbish bins, toilets, stalls that sold vegetables and animals, stray cats and mice. The majority that tested positive were from stalls that sold seafood, livestock and poultry.” You know, the things that Americans tend to eat. Just saying.

So in this specific case, this pandemic absolutely would not have happened in a vegan world. At least, not exactly like this. The farms, the markets, the humans buying meat, all of that happened because humans eat meat.

But when vegans claim that NO pandemics would happen in a vegan world, they are quite obviously wrong. While it is true that most viruses that are a danger to humans have their origin in other animals, we don’t just get those viruses from eating animals, or from farming animals for food. One very obvious example is the black plague, which was most likely spread by fleas living on rats and/or humans. Fleas, rats, and humans share space not because of what humans eat or what animals humans exploit but because we all have similar goals, that is to be warm and well-fed and fruitful.

As much as many animals would probably appreciate it if humans were able to completely disinvest from their lives forever, unfortunately for them we cannot. While we can reduce our meddling in the lives of other species, we cannot just check out of the ecosystem. We are a part of the ecosystem and always will be, unless and until we all fuck off to Mars, at which point we will be a part of THAT ecosystem.

The problem here is one of balance. Getting everyone to go vegan tomorrow isn’t possible and even if it was it isn’t going to solve all our problems. What would help begin to solve our problems? If everyone who CAN eat less meat does eat less meat. If we enact regulations that fix farm conditions. If we limit the use of antibiotics in farming. And if we deplatform vegans like Moby who spread misinformation that gets in the way of people taking the problem seriously and making positive change.

+++


MORE: http://www.skepchick.org

FOLLOW: http://www.twitter.com/skepchicks

AND: http://www.twitter.com/rebeccawatson

LIKE: https://www.facebook.com/skepchicks


+++


GOOD STUFF

Overjoyed': Hear from poet who stole the show at inauguration
2,921,900 views•Jan 20, 2021




CNN's Anderson Cooper speaks with Amanda Gorman, the nation's first-ever youth poet laureate, after she delivered a poem at the inauguration of President Joe Biden

Photo: Gage Skidmore (2019), Creative Commons License 2.0

ABC News and the Washington Post surveyed Americans on President Joe Biden's job performance as he closes in on his first 100 days, an arbitrary number we've been convinced carries some weight. Biden enjoys he approval of 52 percent of adults, compared with 42 percent of adults who don't care for the job he's doing. According to the Post and this ABC News tweet, these are objectively the worst numbers for a sitting president after 100 days in office since World War II.

Twitter

Now, you might ask yourself, “Wait, wasn't Donald Trump president?" It's pleasant to pretend that never happened, but, sorry, it did. The former White House squatter never at any point in his ragamuffin presidency broke 50 percent approval in Gallup polling. The Post concedes that Biden's "approval rating is lower than any recent past presidents except Donald Trump," who had 42 percent approval after his first 100 days. That's quite the asterisk. It's like saying someone is the worst babysitter ever, except for the lady who tried to eat Hansel and Gretel.

President Lost Cause also left office (kicking and screaming) with a 29 percent approval rating.

There's another asterisk here: President Gerald Ford scored 48 percent approval in 1974 after pardoning disgraced former President Richard Nixon. I was born in 1974, so my vanity demands Ford be included in the list of “recent past presidents." ABC News's original tweet from Saturday was flat-out wrong, but it was replaced Sunday with more accurate Debbie Downer content: "52 percent of Americans approve of Pres. Joe Biden's first 100 days in office — the third-lowest of any president at that milestone since Harry Truman, per a new @ABCNews/WaPo poll."

This obsession with a president's first 100 days is a throwback to the concept of a presidential “honeymoon period," during which Americans, regardless of party, mostly rally around a new leader. Despite a contentious 2000 election, Democrats gave George W. Bush a break. His approval was 53.9 percent. That's statistically not much greater than Biden's but a significant improvement upon Bush's 47.9 percent popular vote performance months earlier. Biden, however, is holding his numbers from the 2020 election.

Fox News, which launched in 1996, ruined the honeymoon period. Comparing Biden's numbers at this point to past presidents without mentioning the right wing's perpetual outrage machine is journalistic malpractice. Republicans in 2009 made obstructing Obama their primary objective. For most of 2010, Obama rarely reached 50 percent approval. Biden was present for this crap, and he realizes that keeping the people who supported him happy is more important than trying to make deals with bad-faith Republicans.

Average approval ratings over the course of a presidency are arguably a fairer standard for comparison these days. Bill Clinton's approval rating was 53 percent after 100 days but the average over six months was 50.5 percent. There's a good chance Biden's six month average will remain steady and thus exceed Clinton's. Looking beyond the numbers, Clinton was anecdotally showing signs of weakness among his own voters:

"I had some high hopes," said Linda Brantley, a Milwaukee postal service investigator and Clinton voter, "but they were shot down kind of quickly. His first 100 days, I'd have to give him an F. He's trying to please too many people all at the same time, without really looking at the heart of the issues."

Biden has 90 percent support from Democrats, 47 percent support from independents, and 13 percent support from Republicans, most of whom don't even think he's president. He has high marks on the economy and COVID-19, and is only underwater regarding the imaginary border “crisis." These are good numbers! But the Post claims there are still "potential warning signs ahead about his governing strategy." Biden doesn't even get credit for having a governing strategy, unlike his predecessor who just flung racist feces on the wall to see what stuck. But the media always graded President Klan Robe on a curve.

For example:

NBC News

NBC News reported in 2017:

President Donald Trump's approval rating is the lowest of any president ever polled at this early point in his term.

But while no president has ever been this unpopular this soon, his abysmal rating may not preclude him for a successful presidency just yet.

No, the former guy's abysmal approval rating remained abysmal and precluded the fuck out of his having a successful presidency. Nonetheless, the New York Times relentlessly interviewed white working class voters who stood by their very racist idiot man.

Uncle Joe is doing fine, no asterisk needed. Maybe we'll start hearing from the Biden voters who are happy they received stimulus checks and a COVID-19 vaccine.

[Washington Post]



Run away, kids, she might give you a book! Or she might not!

Photo by Gage Skidmore, Creative Commons license 2.0

Quick postscript on the story about the big lie Fox News and the rest of the rightwing internet screamers have been harping on the past few days. No, not the cheeseburger thing. The other fake story they've been harping on. The one about how every migrant child who comes to America is gifted with a free copy of Vice President Kamala Harris's children's book (Wonkette cut link), to indoctrinate them into believing that ... Kamala Harris is cool? Kamala Harris cares about them? Something.

Laura Italiano, the reporter who wrote the New York Post story about the care package full of antifa supplies Vice President's Book -- a story that is once again up, albeit in a modified form that renders the story absolutely pointless — has resigned in protest. This was the last straw! No more Rupert Murdoch lies for this person!


Italiano wrote that the Harris story was "an incorrect story I was ordered to write and which I failed to push back hard enough against," so that sounds on-brand for a Rupert Murdoch-owned publication. She could have missed us with the part about New York's "liveliest, wittiest tabloid," though.

Oh well, good for her, we suppose. (Though we haven't seen a specific tweet apologizing to Vice President Harris.) We are sure this will help Murdoch's various operations renew their commitments to accuracy in LOL we are not finishing that sentence. As Scott Lemieux at Lawyers, Guns & Money, one of our very favorite blogs, quipped, "I'm sure that Hunter Biden story no Post reporter was willing to put their byline on will totally hold up, though." Which Hunter Biden story? This Hunter Biden story.

Considering all the people who have been flogging the Kamala Harris Is Doing Dolly Parton's Book Club To Migrant Children And YOU'RE PAYING FOR IT story, you'd imagine there would be lots of corrections pouring forth from their various Twitter accounts. (No you wouldn't, these are Republicans we're talking about.)

As of press time, RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel's tweet demanding to know if Harris is "profiting from Biden's border crisis" is still up, and there are no subsequent tweets where she's like DOY DOY DOY DOY DOY and posting .GIFs of herself eating her own foot. Sean Spicer still has a tweet about how the "Vice President's book is in a welcome gift bag for migrants entering the country and the White House refuses to answer how or why it happened," but no update stating that oops, he is a fucking idiot.

GOP Rep. Steve Scalise asked yesterday, "Is Kamala Harris profiting off the border crisis? Americans deserve to know." Has not updated.

GOP Senator Tom Cotton's tweet about how they're "forcing taxpayers to buy Kamala Harris's book to give to those illegal immigrants"? Still up. No correction tweet saying "God, what a lying fucking waste of space I am."

But that's just as of this publishing. We are sure they're just busy crafting their apologies to get them just right.

Just kidding, they're probably figuring out what completely fake cancel culture story they're going to fall for and perpetuate to their moron followers next. Gotta find something to go with the made-up outrages over Joe Biden's cheeseburger confiscation program and the forced public castration of Mr. Potato Head right in the middle of a Dr. Seuss book-burning party or whatever.

You betcha.

Follow Evan Hurst on Twitter RIGHT HERE, DO IT RIGHT HERE!











BAD AND FUGLY STUFF




Right-wing pundits have not had a particularly easy time finding things to criticize about the Biden administration. He doesn't give them a lot to go on behavior wise, and most of their usual conspiracy nonsense just doesn't really work all that well with an old white guy. Sure, they could probably criticize what the administration is actually doing, but that's not really going to hold the attention of their viewership for too long. These are people who want action. They want election theft narratives; they want Secret Muslims; they want Pizzagate and child sex trafficking. They've become so inured to grandiose storylines that it's hard to get outraged over, say, a public works program that probably wasn't even the brainchild of Bill Gates and Satan as part of a secret plot to give everyone the Mark of the Beast.

Alas, there's not a lot of that to go around. So they're stuck with the old "They think they're better than you! Look at all these things they are doing for no other reason than to hurt your feelings! Probably because of how they think they're better than you!"

In an appearance on Saturday's edition of Justice with Judge Jeanine, Gingrich listed all of the ways that the Biden administration is deliberately out to get "regular Americans" who are "people of traditional values."

But let's hear him out.

Look, I think that the left has decided they're going to try to push all the regular Americans into a corner where they either have to fight, in which case they'll be attacked by the news media, or they have to just cave and hide.

Just who are these "regular Americans," exactly? According to Gingrich, they seem to be people who don't want gun control, people who think abortion should be illegal and people who are worked up about "the gay flag" flying at American embassies. Except the thing is, all of those people are actually in the minority, numbers-wise. About 60 percent of Americans support both gun control and abortion being legal, and 76 percent support LGBTQ rights. So that would make these people irregular Americans. Technically.

If you listed every idiotic thing that the Biden administration has done in the first 100 days, you'd begin to realize whether it's threatening everybody who believes in the Second Amendment, or it's attacking everybody who believes in right to life, or it is attacking people of traditional values who are appalled that this administration would fly the gay flag at American embassies all over the world.

As lovely as it is that a right-wing zealot like Newt Gingrich has picked up on people-first language, "people of traditional values" is not a thing.

Rescinding an absurd ban on American embassies flying pride flags that Trump only put in place because Putin made fun of them, is not an attack on "people of traditional values." Those people are still free to marry people of the opposite sex and churn all the butter they please. This is not about them, just as gun control is not about threatening people who believe in the Second Amendment and abortion rights are not about attacking forced birthers, assholes though they may be. If people feel traumatized by the sight of a pride flag or the thought of one flying over an American embassy, they are going to have an incredibly difficult life going forward. If that is someone's biggest problem, if this is something that legitimately infuriates them, they should consider themselves very lucky.

You just go down item by item and it's almost like they have a checklist of what can we do that will really truly infuriate traditional Americans. I have never seen anything like it and somebody asked me this afternoon, I told them I couldn't imagine any administration which has been this deliberately anti-American and this deliberately committed to infuriating the majority of American people. Literally, in over 200 years of history I can't think of a single administration that has been this radical and this hostile.

Strange, then, that the majority of people voted for this. One would think that if the majority of Americans were people who would feel personally attacked by a pride flag, that things would be very different, insofar as electoral politics goes. It also boggles the mind that such delicate and fragile "people of traditional values" would be okay with Donald Trump as their leader. It's almost as if these "traditional values" have nothing to do with "tradition" and everything to do with straight up bigotry.

Let us now turn to a thing Newt Gingrich said about liberals back in 2016:

Far from acknowledging that their grievances are small in the grand scheme of things, liberals frequently describe their First World Problems as the great challenges of our time. And often, this moral self-indulgence comes at the expense of political and news media focus on Real World Problems—the real problems many Americans face in their daily lives.

The "First World Problems" he names in that little Moonie Times op-ed include letting trans people use bathrooms, calling for a nuclear-free world, saving an endangered species, "free birth control to oil divestment, microaggressions and gun show loopholes." As opposed to real problems like ... what flags are flying at American embassies.

Being a curious person, I looked and looked for people being extremely outraged about this flag thing and, despite the ban being lifted two days ago, I couldn't really find anyone other than Gingrich who was even that worked up about it. There wasn't even an article on The Federalist, which is slightly disappointing because it probably would have been a lot of fun to laugh at.

OPEN THREAD!

[Media Matters]



YES, VIRGINIA, THERE'S STILL A PANDEMIC



Drinking bleach to cure COVID-19

Hey! You know what is a bad idea? Drinking bleach. Bleach, while a wonderful product for disinfecting things and keeping your whites their whitest, is not meant to be a beverage, because it's toxic. It is not a cure for anything other than a wine stain on your blouse.

it is also a bad idea to sell bleach as a thing people can drink, while telling them the bleach will cure them of practically any disease (real or imaginary) on earth. In fact, that is the kind of idea you can go to prison for.

On Friday, a grand jury indicted Florida Man Mark Grenon -- leader of the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing, a "church" the indictment says pretty much only exists for the purpose of being able to sell bleach as a cure for things — and his three sons on charges of conspiracy to commit fraud and criminal contempt for continuing to sell their "Miracle Mineral Solution," despite a court order requiring them to stop.

This is the second time in a year the family has been indicted for selling "Miracle Mineral Solution," otherwise known as sodium chlorite (an industrial bleach used for stripping textiles) and water, as a cure for every health issue or disease on earth. They claim it cures "cancer, Alzheimer's, diabetes, autism, malaria, hepatitis, Parkinson's, herpes, HIV/AIDS, and other serious medical conditions." MMS is also a popular "cure" for not entirely real health conditions like Morgellons and "chronic lyme disease."

While the Grenons have been doing this for years, their insistence on marketing the bleach as a cure for COVID-19 led the government to crack down on their operations.

The Department of Justice also seems to not think it was very cute of them to create a church to get around the legal quagmire of selling people bleach to drink.

Via the press release from the Department of Justice:

The indictment [...] alleges that before marketing MMS as a cure for COVID-19, the Grenons marketed MMS as a miracle cure-all for dozens of other serious diseases and disorders, even though the FDA had not approved MMS for any use. The Grenons sold tens of thousands of bottles of MMS nationwide, including to consumers throughout South Florida, according to the allegations. They sold this dangerous product under the guise of Genesis II Church of Health and Healing ("Genesis"), an entity they are accused of creating to avoid government regulation of MMS and shield themselves from prosecution. According to charging documents, Genesis' own websites describe Genesis as a "non-religious church," and Defendant Mark Grenon, the co-founder of Genesis, has repeatedly acknowledged that Genesis "has nothing to do with religion," and that he founded Genesis to "legalize the use of MMS" and avoid "going [ ] to jail." The Genesis websites further stated that MMS could be acquired only through a "donation" to Genesis, but the donation amounts for MMS orders were set at specific dollar amounts, and were mandatory, such that the donation amounts were effectively just sales prices. The indictment alleges that the Grenons received more than $1 million from selling MMS.

That is a whole lot of money for snake oil.

The last time the Grenons were told they couldn't sell bleach as a cure, they threatened that they would get their guns and instigate another "Waco." And they do have a lot of guns, at least one of which they keep in a violin case like old-timey mobsters.

More from the DOJ press release:

[A]ccording to statements made in court by federal prosecutors in Miami, a search warrant was executed for Defendant Jonathan Grenon's house at the time of his arrest, and officers discovered that the Grenons were manufacturing MMS in a shed in Jonathan Grenon's backyard in Bradenton, Florida. Officers seized dozens of blue chemical drums containing nearly 10,000 pounds of sodium chlorite powder, thousands of bottles of MMS, and other items used in the manufacture and distribution of MMS. The government also recovered multiple loaded firearms, including one pump-action shotgun concealed in a custom-made violin case to disguise its appearance, according to prosecutors.

While Jonathan and Jordan Grenon have been detained since their arrest, Mark and Joseph Grenon are currently in Colombia. If convicted, they may all face life sentences in prison.

[Department of Justice]



For one brief shining moment, it seemed like conservatives weren't going to be idiots about a COVID-19 vaccine. The mad MAGA king went all in on a vaccine almost a full year ago. He even called it Operation Warp Speed, even though in reality, the one with all the coronavirus, “warp speed" is fundamentally impossible. Whatever, President Tribble Head wanted a vaccine, and he wanted it fast, fast, fast!

We were as surprised as anyone else but Operation Warp Speed didn't turn out like that WALL to nowhere.The Food and Drug Administration voted to recommend emergency approval of the Pfizer vaccine in December, with Moderna not far behind. Vaccines for everyone! Hooray! This is quite the victory for people who enjoy breathing out in public, but almost a year since the former White House squatter launched Operation Warp Speed, his most faithful supporters aren't interested in the vaccine. Collective enthusiasm for the Spice Girls lasted longer.

Arizona Republican state Rep. Mark Finchem fits the profile of many vaccine skeptics, by which we mean he's a fucking moron. He tested positive for COVID-19 in December, but he won't take any of the available vaccines because he "distrusts the federal government and top public health officials, he's heard mixed messages about the vaccines on social media and television news, and he worries about long-term side effects."

Here's what Finchem, who doesn't live in a van by the river, told Pew Stateline:

I'm very suspicious that what they put in the [vaccines] is nothing more than a cocktail ... Time will tell, and I hope I'm proven wrong.

Drug cocktails, such as the ones used to treat cancer and AIDS, are in fact medically effective. Maybe Finchem thinks the COVID-19 vaccine is just a fancy Long Island iced tea, which admittedly no one should put in their bodies.

Not all vaccine skeptics are white Republican men, but they are the most resistant to reason and the least possessed of any civic responsibility. North Dakota Republican state Rep. Rick Becker doesn't want to be bothered because he “knows he's healthy," just like everyone is before they contract COVID-19. He boasts that he has no preexisting health conditions and his refusal doesn't affect anyone else. The man is a doctor ... well, a plastic surgeon, but even the guys from "Nip/Tuck" knew how herd immunity worked.

Last month, Frank Luntz aired a focus group session with Republican vaccine skeptics. These geniuses flat-out don't trust the very people who should convince them a vaccine is safe. They don't like Dr. Anthony Fauci, who they consider a “liar," a “flip-flopper," and “opportunistic," and they definitely don't trust politicians, especially Democrats.

However, if vaccine skeptics don't trust doctors or politicians, they at least trust Joe Rogan, who is neither of those things. Random idiots have apparently sought the podcaster's counsel on this subject. Here's what he told them:

ROGAN: I think you should get vaccinated if you're vulnerable.

Everyone's vulnerable to COVID-19, even Superman. Seriously, there's kryptonite in that shit.

ROGAN: I think you should get vaccinated if you feel like — my parents are vaccinated. I've encouraged a lot of people to get — and people say, do you think it's safe to get vaccinated? I've said, yeah, I think for the most part it's safe to get vaccinated. I do. I do.

Glad we have the thumb's up from the nation's top infectious disease podcaster.

ROGAN: But if you're like 21 years old, and you say to me, should I get vaccinated? I'll go no. Are you healthy? Are you a healthy person? Like, look, don't do anything stupid, but you should take care of yourself. You should — if you're a healthy person, and you're exercising all the time, and you're young, and you're eating well, like, I don't think you need to worry about this.

Yeah, that's all bullshit.

Even if you're young and healthy, you could still spread the virus to people who aren't. Herd immunity is a key component of vaccine effectiveness. Otherwise, there's a good chance you can make even fully vaccinated people sick. That should matter to you or maybe you're just a total sociopath like Peter D'Abrosca. The former Republican candidate for Congress from North Carolina declared in an op-ed for American Greatness that I Won't Take The Vaccine Because It Makes Liberals Mad.

My primary reason for refusing the vaccine is much simpler: I dislike the people who want me to take it, and it makes them mad when they hear about my refusal. That, in turn, makes me happy.

Maybe it's petty, but the thought of the worst people on planet earth, those whom I like to call the Branch Covidians, literally shaking as I stroll into Target vaccine-free, makes me smile.

My cousin, who was not much older than I am, died from COVID-19 recently. He lived in South Carolina, where there are a lot of Republicans who share D'Abrosca's contempt for liberals and anyone who just wants to survive this pandemic. Almost 575,000 Americans haven't, including my cousin. We've long since reached the point where “vaccine skeptic" is just a fancy term for “selfish asshole."

[Pew Stateline / Mediamatters]

Follow Stephen Robinson on Twitter.



Self-five!

Imagine you are a person. You with us so far? OK good.

Imagine you are a person who has a job that's say, 851.64 miles from your house, if you use roads, and are willing to travel through Canada to get there. By air it is 573.44 miles.

Imagine there is only one airline that takes that flight, which takes about an hour and a half.

Yes, you might have imagined that your job is in Alaska.

Do you think it would be an A) good idea or a B) bad idea, to really piss off the one airline that operates the flight that takes you to work?

Alaska state Senator Lora Reinbold (R-obviously) thought it was a good idea. And you know what she did? She was a fucking dick about Alaska Airlines' mask policy, which is in place because there's this whole pandemic. Indeed she was a dick numerous times.

So Alaska Airlines said fine, you don't get to fly with us. Maybe you could use a different airline, HAHA WE'RE THE ONLY GAME IN TOWN, DICKWAD!

"We have notified Senator Lora Reinbold that she is not permitted to fly with us for her continued refusal to comply with employee instruction regarding the current mask policy," spokesman Tim Thompson said by email.

Have fun getting to work, asshole.

And she did, reportedly! The Anchorage Daily News explains that Reinbold "drove more than 700 miles from her home in Eagle River through a swath of Alaska and part of the Yukon to the Southeast town of Haines, where she caught a five-hour ferry ride to Juneau." That's right, she literally had to drive through Canada and then take a five-hour boat ride. It took 14 hours when all was said and done. All because she's a stupid asshole.

Of course, like a cartoon dipshit, she's pulling the whole "I MEANT to do that!" card, braggin' about how fun ferries are and bellyaching about the "monopoly in air transport." Also she ruined her husband's birthday.

We'll see how fun that 14-hour Yukon expedition and ferry ride is in a few weeks, depending on how long this MENSA-ready brain wizard is banned from Alaskan airspace.

Reinbold is also complaining on the internet, in a public post, about how Alaska Airlines gave her name to the media, we guess by confirming that her poor behavior resulted in this ban.

Here are some videos of Reinbold at the Juneau airport being an asshole to flight staff a few days back. This is what apparently got her cancel cultured from airplanes:

Back in November, Reinbold got on the internet and complained that airline staff are "mask bullies" who did "mask tyranny" to her. She said she got in trouble because a "scaredy cat Karen" (LOL heal thyself, asshole) decided to be a "Tattle tail" (really) who got her in big trouble. In another post, she gave hot tips for how to evade requirements for showing a recent COVID test, saying you should "sneak by if you are bold fir they cannot force you" [sic].

After she was a total fucking dick that time, Reinbold reportedly sent some flight staff a cake that said "I'm sorry if I offended you."

Look at this stupid goddamn cake.

This woman is not smart. Also a total dick.

In other words, she's a typical Republican elected official.

The end.

[Anchorage Daily News]



MAGA-loving former actor Kirstie Alley, whom you may remember from "Veronica's Closet," has thoughts about other people's employment status. She shared the following white entitlement treatise on Twitter Wednesday:

Twitter

It's time to stop collecting unemployment and stop working ... just had FIVE places in the last two days apologize for bad service because they can't staff their businesses. So hope we're not hearing “there are no jobs available."

So, Alley's been to at least five (upper case) places in the past two days? I haven't been to five places in the past five months. And these are just the places that pissed her off enough that she complained. You've probably noticed that it's always assholes who consistently receive what they consider bad service.

Alley's regurgitating the rightwing lie that generous (as in any) unemployment benefits are keeping lazy deadbeats at home binging the Look Who's Talking trilogy. Last week, Florida Senator Marco Rubio whined that "Florida small business owners are all telling me the same thing. They can't find people to fill available jobs. You can come up with all kinds of reasons and wave around all the Ivy League studies you want, but what does common sense tell you is the reason?"

Business owners are commiserating with spoiled actors and spineless politicians about how the help won't pull up their bootstraps and report back to work, risking death from COVID-19 for $7.65 an hour. Governor Ron DeSantis never enforced a mask mandate in Florida, while keeping most businesses open despite spikes in COVID-19 cases. Working conditions are overtly more dangerous for workers than they were prior to the pandemic. Republicans want people so desperate they'd jeopardize their health for a paycheck. COVID-19 was the new black lung, just the price working people pay to maintain the affluent's preferred standard of living. God forbid Rebecca Howe wait an extra 10 minutes for her next Mai Tai.

It's also not like these businesses complaining about a labor shortage offer free day care or anything. It's hard to fill the lunch rush when schools aren't fully open and parents have to stay home with their kids. People who worked in the service industry aren't lazy. They're struggling to survive, yet the people, like Alley, who protest most bitterly about how inconvenienced they are have coasted safely through a pandemic that's killed 560,000 Americans.

Restaurant workers in Florida have been on the “pandemic frontlines" for months now. Business is slow, and if Rubio bothered to talk to anyone but his donors, he'd know how hard people are working and how little they have to show for it. Florida hasn't prioritized making restaurant workers eligible for the vaccine, despite DeSantis reopening them at 100 percent capacity.

The Fort Myers News-Press recently profiled Shannon Soffian, a server at Cristof's on McGregor in Fort Myers, Florida. When she was interviewed, she was on her 34th straight day of work (she'd work another six before getting a day off). She was exhausted, physically and mentally.

The 44-year-old is her family's primary breadwinner. Her husband is a former journalist for this news outlet who was laid off in early 2019. They have a 10-year-old son who is home-schooled. Soffian also has four adult children who float into and out of their house.

She added up her tips and wages from the past seven days. It was what she'd make in three days during a typical February. She took out rent, groceries, $150 for the respiratory medicines she still needs after contracting COVID in July.

She sank into her turquoise sheets and cried.

"It was not a slow week. It was a week where we got our asses handed to us every single day," Soffian said. "I have cried my way through entire shifts, where the tears are just streaking down my face, getting caught in my mask. It's still good money, I'm aware of that, and I know whining about it is absurd.

No, she's not the one who should apologize for whining. Soffian has endured yelling, cursing customers but she still can't afford health care.

Although it's easy for awful people to scapegoat restaurant workers, there's not a proven link between current unemployment benefits and the challenges the industry currently has filling vacancies. Carlos Trejo, kitchen manager at Dixie Fish Co. on Fort Myers Beach, said many of his cooks and dishwashers couldn't afford to wait for the restaurant to reopen after the first shutdown. They moved on to other jobs in fields such as construction or retail that provided steadier, less risky work, with less direct exposure to total assholes.

At Cristof's in Fort Myers, Soffian said mask fights have played out almost daily: customers begging staff to take them off; customers refusing to wear theirs on the short walk from the host stand to a table; customers walking in with mesh masks riddled with holes.

Kirstie Alley sold her six-bedroom, seven-bathroom home in Los Angeles for $7.8 million early this year. She'd unloaded her Islesboro, Maine, “cottage" in 2020. Wherever she lives now, we pity anyone who works in the local service industry.

I leave you now with non-MAGA creep Shelley Long being funny on “Cheers."

[Fort Myers News-Press]

Follow Stephen Robinson on Twitter.







THERE'S STILL A WHOLE LOTTA

 PANDEMIC GOING ON

PANDEMIC

THE WEEKLY PANDEMIC REPORT

Photo of flu patients during the First World War



If you prefer your data in a visual format, here's the current map from COVID Exit Strategy, using data from the CDC and the COVID Tracking Project.

I want to add this link to the weekly report. It's important to remember:

A Sense of Doubt blog post #1983 - Is Coronavirus more contagious and more deadly than the flu? YES.



ALSO... I am seeing a big discrepancy between the Johns Hopkins data in death totals and WORLDOMETER data, which aggregates data from many more sources. Could this be the slow down due to the change in how the CDC obtains the data, having it filter first through Health and Human Services department.

WEEKLY PANDEMIC REPORT - JOHNS HOPKINS

Anyway, as usual, here's the weekly links to the data about cases (lower than reality) and deaths (lower than reality, also) due to COVID-19.


Data can be found here, as always: 

This is also a good data site:

Last updated: May 01, 2021, 17:35 GMT

 United States

Coronavirus Cases:

33,116,664

Deaths:

590,215

Recovered:

25,713,185
About Worldometer
Worldometer manually analyzes, validates, and aggregates data from thousands of sources in real time and provides global COVID-19 live statistics for a wide audience of caring people around the world.
Over the past 15 years, our statistics have been requested by, and provided to Oxford University PressWileyPearsonCERNWorld Wide Web Consortium (W3C)The AtlanticBBC, Milton J. Rubenstein Museum of Science & Technology, Science Museum of Virginia, Morgan StanleyIBMHewlett PackardDellKasperskyPricewaterhouseCoopersAmazon AlexaGoogle Translate, the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), the U2 concert, and many others.
Worldometer is cited as a source in over 10,000 published books and in more than 6,000 professional journal articles and was voted as one of the best free reference websites by the American Library Association (ALA), the oldest and largest library association in the world.
THE CORONAVIRUS IS MUTATING NOW WHAT?

Coronavirus Is No 1918 Pandemic - The Atlantic

A Red Cross worker in the United States, 1918

No image available



















THE RANDOM ROUNDUP





Pentagon Explains Odd Transfer of 175 Million IP Addresses To Obscure Company (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:The US Department of Defense puzzled Internet experts by apparently transferring control of tens of millions of dormant IP addresses to an obscure Florida company just before President Donald Trump left the White House, but the Pentagon has finally offered a partial explanation for why it happened. The Defense Department says it still owns the addresses but that it is using a third-party company in a "pilot" project to conduct security research. "Minutes before Trump left office, millions of the Pentagon's dormant IP addresses sprang to life" was the title of a Washington Post article on Saturday. Literally three minutes before Joe Biden became president, a company called Global Resource Systems LLC "discreetly announced to the world's computer networks a startling development: It now was managing a huge unused swath of the Internet that, for several decades, had been owned by the US military," the Post said.

The number of Pentagon-owned IP addresses announced by the company rose to 56 million by late January and 175 million by April, making it the world's largest announcer of IP addresses in the IPv4 global routing table. The Post said it got an answer from the Defense Department on Friday in the form of a statement from the director of "an elite Pentagon unit known as the Defense Digital Service." The Post wrote: "'Brett Goldstein, the DDS's director, said in a statement that his unit had authorized a 'pilot effort' publicizing the IP space owned by the Pentagon. 'This pilot will assess, evaluate, and prevent unauthorized use of DoD IP address space,' Goldstein said. 'Additionally, this pilot may identify potential vulnerabilities.' Goldstein described the project as one of the Defense Department's 'many efforts focused on continually improving our cyber posture and defense in response to advanced persistent threats. We are partnering throughout DoD to ensure potential vulnerabilities are mitigated.'"


Over the past decade, the United States population grew at the slowest rate since the 1930s, the Census Bureau reported on Monday, a remarkable slackening that was driven by a leveling off of immigration and a declining birthrate. The New York Times reports:The bureau also reported changes to the nation's political map: The long-running trend of the South and the West gaining population -- and congressional representation -- at the expense of the Northeast and the Midwest, continued, with Texas gaining two seats and Florida, one. California, long a leader in population growth, lost a seat for the first time in history. [...] The numbers are the product of the most controversial census process in decades. The Trump administration tried to add a citizenship question to the Census form, but the Supreme Court eventually blocked that plan. [...] The Bureau also faced a daunting task of conducting the Census during a pandemic. Then, last summer, the Trump administration pushed it to stop the count sooner than planned.

Booming economies in states like Texas, Nevada, Arizona and North Carolina, have drawn Americans away from struggling small communities in high-cost, cold weather states. In New York, 48 of 62 counties are estimated to be losing population. In Illinois, 93 of 101 counties are believed to be shrinking. In 1970, the West and South comprised just under half the U.S. population -- today it's nearly 63 percent. The new decennial census counted 331,449,281 Americans as of April 1, 2020. The total was up by just 7.4 percent over the previous decade. Combined with the decline in inflows of immigrants, and shifting age demographics -- there are now more Americans 80 and older than 2 or younger -- the United States may be entering an era of substantially lower population growth, demographers said, putting it with the countries of Europe and East Asia that face serious long-term challenges with rapidly aging populations.
"This is a big deal," said Ronald Lee, a demographer who founded the Center on the Economics and Demography of Aging at the University of California at Berkeley. "If it stays lower like this, it means the end of American exceptionalism in this regard." It used to be clear where the country was headed demographically, Professor Lee said -- faster growth than many other rich nations. But that has changed. "Right now it is very murky," he said.



"An internal task force found that Facebook failed to take appropriate action against the Stop the Steal movement ahead of the January 6 Capitol insurrection, and hoped the company could 'do better next time,'" writes Buzzfeed:Last month, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified in front of a House of Representatives committee that his company had done its part "to secure the integrity of the election." While the social network did not catch everything, the billionaire chief executive said, Facebook had "made our services inhospitable to those who might do harm" in the lead-up to the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Less than a week after his appearance, however, an internal company report reached a far different conclusion... Shared on Facebook's employee communication platform last month, the report is a blunt assessment of how people connected to "Stop the Steal," a far-right movement based on the conspiracy theory that former president Donald Trump won the 2020 US presidential election, used the social network to foment an attempted coup. The document explicitly states that Facebook activity from people connected to Stop the Steal and other Trump loyalist groups including the Patriot Party played a role in the events of Jan. 6, and that the company's emphasis on rooting out fake accounts and "inauthentic behavior" held it back from taking preemptive action when real people were involved...

The document contradicts Zuckerberg's statement to Congress about Facebook being "inhospitable" to harmful content about the election, and refutes chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg's January comment that the insurrection was "largely organized on platforms that don't have our abilities to stop hate, don't have our standards and don't have our transparency...." Facebook disputed the idea that the report went against Zuckerberg's and Sandberg's public statements and noted that both had said there was violative content on the platform that the company did not catch...

Facebook's researchers also outline the bureaucratic, policy, and enforcement struggles of the social giant when trying to respond to a coordinated, fast-paced movement that exploits its platform to spread hate and incite violence. Despite the company removing the most populous Stop the Steal groups from its platform, the enforcement was "piecemeal" and allowed other groups to flourish. The company admitted that it only realized it was a cohesive movement "after the Capitol Insurrection and a wave of Storm the Capitol events across the country...." Ultimately, the report says, the issue is that the company is not prepared to deal with what it calls "coordinated authentic harm."

"We learned a lot from these cases," the report says. "We're building tools and protocols and having policy discussions to help us do better next time."

But Buzzfeed's 3,400-article concludes on a skeptical note. "The report echoes previous high-profile examples where Facebook failed to act and later issued a report promising to do better..."

UPDATE (4/26): After the report's existence was revealed, access to it was suddenly restricted for many Facebook employees, Buzzfeed writes — on a new web page republishing the whole report in its entirety.


Maya Wei-Haas writes via National Geographic:Standing among patches of muddy snow on the outskirts of Baltimore, Maryland, I bent down to pick up a piece of the planet that should have been hidden miles below my feet. On that chilly February day, I was out with a pair of geologists to see an exposed section of Earth's mantle. While this layer of rock is usually found between the planet's crust and core, a segment peeks out of the scrubby Maryland forest, offering scientists a rare chance to study Earth's innards up close. Even more intriguing, the rock's unusual chemical makeup suggests that this piece of mantle, along with chunks of lower crust scattered around Baltimore, was once part of the seafloor of a now-vanished ocean.

Over the roughly 490 million years since their formation, these hunks of Earth were smashed by shifting tectonic plates and broiled by searing hot fluids rushing through cracks, altering both their composition and sheen. Mantle rock is generally full of sparkly green crystals of the mineral olivine, but the rock in my hand was surprisingly unremarkable to look at: mottled yellow-brown stone occasionally flecked with black. Because of this geologic clobbering, scientists have struggled for more than a century to determine the precise origins of this series of rocks. Now, Guice and his colleagues have applied a fresh eye and state-of-the-art chemical analyses to the set of rocky exposures in Baltimore. Their work shows that the seemingly bland series of stones once lurked underneath the ancient Iapetus Ocean.

More than half a billion years ago, this ocean spanned some 3,000 to 5,000 miles, cutting through what is now the United States' eastern seaboard. Much of the land where the Appalachian mountains now stand was on one side of the ocean, and parts of the modern East Coast were on the other. "It's a huge ocean between them, and we've got a little bit of that ocean smooshed in Baltimore," says Guice, lead author of a recent study describing the find in the journal Geosphere.







https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/21/04/28/0357257/citizen-kane-loses-perfect-rotten-tomatoes-score-thanks-to-resurfaced-80-year-old-review


'Citizen Kane' Loses Perfect Rotten Tomatoes Score Thanks To Resurfaced 80-Year-Old Review

Rotten Tomatoes has unearthed a 1941 review of Orson Welles' classic that single-handedly took down its decades-long perfect critics' score. From The Hollywood Reporter:Citizen Kane's score across 116 reviews has been reduced to a mere 99 percent "Fresh." The ranking slip is due to a single negative review that was recently unearthed by Rotten Tomatoes as part of the site's Archival Project, which focuses on resurrecting critics and publications of the past and adding archived reviews to classic films. The project discovered a Citizen Kane review that ran in the Chicago Tribune in 1941 and is only available online as a scanned newspaper clipping. Last month, the review was quietly added to Kane's page.

The review's headline is incredibly on point, given the circumstances: "Citizen Kane Fails to Impress Critic as Greatest Ever Filmed." If that sounds like somebody went to the theater with rather high expectations, the review confirms as much. "You've heard a lot about this picture and I see by the ads that some experts think it 'the greatest movie ever made,'" reads the review. "I don't. It's interesting. It's different. In fact, it's bizarre enough to become a museum piece. But its sacrifice of simplicity to eccentricity robs it of distinction and general entertainment value." The review went on to pan the film's iconic use of shadow ("it gives me the creeps and I kept wishing they'd let a little sunshine in"), yet praised Welles in the title role ("a zealous and effective performer").

The critic apparently didn't put their real name on the piece, but, as Boing-Boing pointed out, used the common-at-the-time pseudonym Mae Tinee (say it aloud). But whoever wrote it managed to pen a bomb that took 80 years to effectively detonate and blow up Citizen Kane's perfect score. According to Rotten Tomatoes, the first Citizen Kane reviews were added to the site in 2000 and the film most likely had a consistent 100 percent score for the past two decades -- until Mr./Ms. Tinee's dismissive takedown was discovered.

Max Richter In Concert: Reimagining Vivaldi
1,535,053 views•Aug 26, 2013



NPR Music
5.78M subscribers

Can't take another moment of Vivaldi's ubiquitous Four Seasons? Neither could Max Richter, a London-based composer who deftly blurs the lines between the classical and electronic worlds. Long ago he loved it the piece but like some of us, he grew tired of the overplayed warhorse, which can be found in no fewer than 250 recordings on sites like ArchivMusic.

So instead of writing off the piece forever, Richter rewrote it. He discarded about three quarters of Vivaldi's original, substituted his own music and tucked in some light electronics for a total Four Seasons makeover. It sounds a little hipper — lighter on its feet in places, darker and more cinematic in others. Still, Richter's remodeled version retains the basic shape, and much of the spirit, of the master's original four violin concertos — each about ten minutes and in three movements, sequenced fast-slow-fast.

Richter recorded his rejiggered Seasons with violin soloist Daniel Hope and together they brought the project to (Le) Poisson Rouge, the Greenwich Village music space, where we had our cameras set up and ready to roll.

In Richter's reimagining, you'll recognize more than a few weather-related signposts like the violin's shivering figures in "Winter" and bolts of thunder in stormy "Summer." Yet in other places the music is heavily disguised. The cheerful birdsong that opens Vivaldi's "Spring" emerges as mere shards of the original, backed by moody pedal points in the electronic low end, lending it a movie music feel. And Vivaldi's violin horn calls in the finale of "Autumn" morph into a comforting minimalist blanket of warm double basses and electronics.

The revamped Vivaldi is about as "classical" as Richter gets. For a taste of his more electronic side, the second half of this concert features selections from Infra, dance music he wrote for London's Royal Ballet, based on T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land. For this music, Richter pares down to just a piano, his laptop and a string quartet, but he weaves in many unusual sounds. Here you'll find a dusty treasure-trove of old shortwave radio signals, industrial rumbles, clicks and pops serving as the underlying bed for Richter's gritty and forlorn soundscapes. -- TOM HUIZENGA 

Program:

    Vivaldi: The Four Seasons (Recomposed by Max Richter)
    Music from Infra


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - date - time

- Days ago = ## days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I plan to continue Hey Mom posts at least twice per week but will continue to post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

No comments: