A Sense of Doubt blog post #3056 - SoD Reprint of #2760 - Lessons for Writing to REMEMBER

A Sense of Doubt blog post #3056 - SoD Reprint of #2760 - Lessons for Writing to REMEMBER

So, hi there.

I am doing reprints for the next three days to save me time and energy, which I am putting elsewhere.

After seeing that TOR Publishing is launching a new imprint called BRAMBLE, an old novel idea re-surfaced, and so I decided to set aside the current project to attempt to finish a first draft of the novel this year, or if I can really apply myself, by the end of the summer (three months).

Here's BRAMBLE:

And so, I have a romance novel idea.

Here's some of what I wrote in my journal for the novel: 

2306.28-08:39

Okay, it’s Wednesday morning, and I am starting with a goal to finish this book this year or be an abject failure.

To accomplish this goal, I must schedule time to write and keep to that schedule. I must set weekly goals, so if I miss a day when I planned to write, I make it up another day and time.

Last year, when I took my writing retreat, I learned things about myself and why I did not get as much writing done as I wished. One issue was the unfamiliar place. I always managed better at the Neahtawanta because it was always familiar. Also, the place was not what I hoped and not exceedingly comfortable. Also, I hit some depression. But eventually I got rolling and I identified lessons, rules, to write by.

(That's today's reprint; link below.)

Also, in expanding on lesson number five (see post reprinted below), I need to make the writing a priority. Instead of putting other things in the way of writing, do the writing first. This goal will be tough this summer as I write best in the morning, and I do not have enough morning time Monday-Thursday as I have to teach at 9 a.m. each of those days. And so, I am going to have to write another time and stick to it.

For instance, today, instead of finishing the blog entry, I started with this work and will go back to that blog entry later.

If I am aiming to finish a draft of 100K words by the end of the year that’s six months of production (July-December). That’s about 16,000 words a month. That means I need to write 4000 words a week. That’s a lot of words. Back when I was tracking my word output, a decent writing day was 5,000 words. A great day was 8,000 words. And I had a few monster days eclipsing 8k. The word goal is the words of the book itself, the words the readers will read, not the “Bible,” the plans, plots, character backgrounds, and so on. And so, possibly, 4,000 words a week is doable. It’s even possible that in just one day of writing I can get that output. However, with work, especially in the Fall, it’s difficult to achieve that kind of output. Then again, I need to be better about taking at least one day off completely from work each week no matter how much work I have. It’s a nice goal. Not sure I can actually do it.

Okay, I am going to do it. In fact, maybe I should aim to double the output in the summer when I am less busy. If I can write 32,000 words a month or 8,000 words a week from July 1st through September 30th (three months), that’s nearly the entire book = 96,000 words. And 8,000 words a week this summer is four 1000 words days each week, which seems very achievable. I can even get 2,000 words in on a day if I miss that 1,000 words * four days goal.

Okay, plan for output is PLANNED.

I would like to finish my novella, also, but we’ll see if that’s feasible.

This journal is a good warm up. It’s meant to be a dumping ground, a way to shake loose the cob webs, a way to get easy output. I have been at it about 30 minutes and have 600+ words and spent time trying to rename my main character.

So, that's the plan.



Thanks for tuning in. I am now off on a hike.

Thursday, September 8, 2022

A Sense of Doubt blog post #2760 - And now I am home - Writer's Retreat Recap

A Sense of Doubt blog post #2760 - And now I am home - Writer's Retreat Recap

I am returned home and have been for over a week by the time I got around to finishing this post.

I am not writing at length about what I learned from the trip because really I can boil down six takeaway realizations, lessons, I gained from my time away. They all have to do with writing.

the LESSONS

1. Stop second guessing.

2. Any progress is good progress.

3. I don't have to show everything.

4. I am writing all the time even when it's just in my head.

5. If I want to log significant time, make an appointment with myself. Put it on my calendar.

6. Be less hard on myself.

SECOND GUESSING

As I work on a novel, I have lots of ideas that I capture in big files of notes journal style, which means just writing whatever is in my head into the file.

But then as I consider ideas and how to execute them, I second guess myself, which leads to a lack of forward progress as I spin my wheels, rewriting and changing what I already have.

Sometimes second guessing is easy and natural. For instance, I just wrote a scene in which a character gets bad news and starts running. Well, she's the police chief and seeing the chief of police running through town to the high school is not keeping a situation low key. So I am changing that. She would want to run and then stop her impulse.

But for bigger plot and character stuff, once I have a pretty good plan in place, I need to leave it alone and keep writing. I can always change it later. But second guessing and endless re-dos are why I have not finished a novel since 1993.

ANY PROGRESS IS GOOD PROGRESS

Hence my new rule of at least 15 minutes a day of writing. I can find 15 minutes in any day, right?

As long as I spend the time WRITING the actual narrative, then this progress is good progress.

First drafts are supposed to be shitty anyway, right?

I DON'T HAVE TO SHOW EVERYTHING

Unlike the show don't tell advice that is so popular, I have tendency to show too much, to think I need to show every moment, every little detail. But that's not needed. For instance, in my book, it starts with the discovery of the first murder victim. The narrative then backs up in time just a little and for not too many pages to set up the main characters and situations. When the police chief gets the call, the reader knows what it is. I don't have to show the call as it is not important by itself.

I AM WRITING ALL THE TIME

This is not a new one. None of these are, really. I have thought of them all before, and the the first two have been constant refrains for years though apparently I need to keep reminding myself.

Writing all the time refers to how I write in my head (as many writers do - all writers?). I am brainstorming ideas, I am plotting, I am working out back story, I am refining and building character, and I am writing actual narrative. 

This concept is related to the "stop mid-sentence" advice. I think it's better to stop writing for the day right in the middle of something, even a sentence, so I know right where to start the next day rather than writing to a stopping point. I stole this idea from a famous writer. I don't remember who.

If I want to log significant time, make an appointment with myself. Put it on my calendar.

Since I am so easily distracted and/or drawn into a work sinkhole, and yet I am able to keep appointments when these are made, if I want to complete a significant amount of writing, say like 2-3 hours at least, perhaps I put it on the calendar and treat it like an appointment.

The other writing can be stolen time. That 15-30 minutes fits whenever and wherever it fits. But I big chunk of time may need to be scheduled to hold myself to it.

Be less hard on myself.

One of my biggest problems, and I am sure not just for me, is that I always think I can do more than I can in a day. In the morning of a day I have completely for work at home, I think I can do seven things, so many things, and then I can really only do two or three of them. And then when I only do two of seven things, I feel like a failure even though I worked very hard all day with very little down time and often, like on Saturdays, as late as 10:30 p.m.

So, I am determined to be easier on myself. To not beat myself up for not doing seven things because that's unrealistic. And maybe, I need to get better at setting realistic expectations for what I can do in a day and be happy if I get done what I can get done. Even if I continue to set lofty goals, I am trying to be better at accepting that what I could get done is A LOT and to be happy with that productivity.

Also, I am running another time management and analysis assignment in one of my classes this fall, and I track my time data as well. For the Fall, I want to track not just what I spend my time on, but when I log "work time," what work am I doing and how long does it take me to complete tasks that I have to do often, such as grading a set of persuasive essays with the audio feedback and rubric, which is very time consuming. The whole point of time analysis is to examine how I can better spend the most precious resource of my life: time.

I am still determined to write every day, at least five days a week, and to reach a certain weekly out]put.

Since I am writing these words NINE days after the alleged publication date of this post, I have seen how little I have managed to log that writing time: two of the nine days.

Again, in not feeling like a failure and being kind time myself, two days is better than zero days. If I can make it at least three days next week, then I have made progress. That's my other problem: I want everything all at once, NOW, and things do not work that way, especially NOVEL writing.

Okay, back to work.

Since I have fallen nine days behind (twelve was my record), I am going to put the blog in REPRINT mode for two weeks and then probably simple shares and one things until I can get back on track and stay ahead.

The goals of the blog work are to stay active, to stay ahead of the daily deadlines, to work on it at night or early in the morning when I am not typically working anyway, to not use it as an excuse not to write fiction as it's easier and less anxiety-producing, and to be less "scheduled" and do whatever I want to do and what is easiest. Catching up and getting ahead with at least two weeks of reprints will be easiest.

I close with where I stayed on the Writing Retreat.

As always, thanks for tuning in.

Here's where I was staying in Eureka with photos. You can find it on AirBnb.

3335 Cottage Street, Suite 1
Eureka, CA 95503

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2209.08 - 10:10

- Days ago = 2624 days ago

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2307.01 - 10:10

- Days ago = 2920 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I plan to continue Hey Mom posts at least twice per week but will continue to post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

A Sense of Doubt blog post #1379 - Why Nazis Were Obsessed With Atlantis

A Sense of Doubt blog post #1379 - Why Nazis Were Obsessed With Atlantis

I have always been mad about Atlantis.

And the Nazis intrigue me.

It's on my to-do list to read The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, and I will probably pull the trigger on that item next year sometime.

For now, a filler share because I am deeply immersed in Grading Hell, but then, when am I not?

This is a great article, and I LOVE THE BIG THINK.

from - https://bigthink.com/culture-religion/why-the-nazis-were-obsessed-with-finding-the-lost-city-of-atlantis

Why the Nazis were obsessed with finding the lost city of Atlantis

The Nazis actively searched for Atlantis, seeing it as important to their mythology.

PAUL RATNER

26 November, 2018

• The mythical city of Atlantis was first mentioned in Plato's writings.
• Top Nazis, including Heimlich Himmler, tried to find the city through expeditions.
• The island was key to Nazi thinking about the "Aryan race".

You might think Spielberg and Lucas just made up all the run-ins Indiana Jones kept having with the Nazis. But the truth is likely stranger than fiction - the Nazis were not only obsessed with the mystical and the undiscovered, they staked a large part of their strategy to winning World War 2 on it. And that may be ultimately why they lost.
While beliefs in fringe sciences, pagan religions and the occult spread like wildfire throughout Germany in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the myth of Atlantis had a truly profound impact that was weaved into the emerging Nazi philosophy.

Historically, Atlantis first came to prominence as an island mentioned within an allegory in Plato's dialogues Timaeus and Critias, written about 330 B.C. In these stories, Atlantis is regarded as an enemy force that came to attack the Athenian nation-state. Athens repelled the attack, according to Plato, with island of Atlantis eventually losing support of the Gods and sinking into the ocean. While Plato didn't really say all that much more about Atlantis, he pointed to the supposed location of the island as somewhere "beyond the Pillars of Hercules" (a.k.a. the Straits of Gibraltar). Still, this wasn't much to go on and there's not been strong other evidence to corroborate the existence of Atlantis as more than a fictional creation.

In Nazi lore, however, the legends of Atlantis got mixed with Aryan myths, leading to a resurgence of the concept.

Athanasius Kircher's map of Atlantis, locating it in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, from Mundus Subterraneus 1669, published in Amsterdam. South is on the top in the map's orientation.Eric Kurlander, the professor of history at Stetson University, traced the strange movements in Germany of about a hundred years ago in his book "Hitler's Monsters: A Supernatural History of the Third Reich". He contends that one of the most influential beliefs was Ariosophy, championed by Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels. This esoteric doctrine "prophesied the resurgence of a lost Aryan civilization peopled by Nordic 'God Men.'"
Lanz told the myths of these "God Men" in a magazine called Ostara which he claims to have given in 1909 to none other than a young Adolf Hitler. In the issues, muscular Aryans defended barely-dressed blonde women from scary "ape-men", as wrote Michael Dirda in the Washington Post.

Were there actually such Aryans whose lineage can be traced to the Nazi ideals? The word "Aryan" generally designated people of Indo-European heritage but in racist Nazi thinking, the idea of the "Aryan race" has come to mean the supposed existence of a distinct and superior race of Germanic people – a proposition not supported by facts. The only historical Aryans have been Indo-Iranian people who spread their languages throughout Eurasia from 4000 to 1000 BC.

Germans of early 20th century, however, were looking to root themselves in ancient traditions, pillaging whatever information they found appealing. Lanz's 1905 book "The Theozoology, or the Science of Sodom's Apelings and the God's Electrons" incorporated Hindu mythology – a common feature of German theosophical texts of the time which claimed that somewhere in India and Tibet were hidden societies of ancient Atlanteans or "secret masters".

This possible connection to India and Tibet was a particular obsession for Heimlich Himmler, the ruthless head of the SS and the Gestapo police. For the Aryan myth to be proven true, he figured, the actual location and history of the Aryans needed to be uncovered. Himmler spent a decade on a semi-mystical project that had an SS unit called the Ahnenerbe (Ancestral Heritage), which included archaeologists and scientists, searching the globe for the lost Aryans of Atlantis.

As the historian Sir Richard Evans of Cambridge University pointed out: "The Nazis saw world history in terms of a struggle between races and survival of the fittest. They thought all races were inferior to the Aryans. Himmler wanted to press forward with a new religion, including sun worship and old gods. He wanted the SS to become a kind of cult, or Aryan aristocracy."

Heinrich Himmler

In 1938, Himmler's interests (which also revolved around finding the Holy Grail of Christian mythology) resulted in sending an expedition team of Nazi scientists, led by the explorer and zoologist Ernst Schäfer, to the Himalayas. The location was chosen specifically thanks to the work of Herman Wirth, a contemporary scholar of ancient religions. Wirth conjectured that there is a reason for why similar-looking symbols can be found in different parts of the world. That reason is the race of people who lived in Atlantis in the Atlantic Ocean (likely between Portugal and Britain). The scholar proposed that survivors of sinking Atlantis fled to high places, vowing to avoid the sea that ruined their civilization initially. That's how the descendants supposedly ended up in Tibet.

During the Tibet expedition, Nazi scientists collected thousands of specimens while comparing locals to a list of facial features and concluded that they descended from the Aryans. "Hitler and his anthropologists thought that by measuring people's heads you could tell which race they were," explained Sir Richard.

Ernst Schäfer during his last expedition to Tibet. 1938.

Declaring that they found out what happened to Atlantis was a boost to the myth-fueled Nazi war machine. Becoming convinced that Tibetans were survivors of Atlantis also hardened Himmler's views on racial purity. He decided that the Aryan master race was by now much weaker due to intermixing and needed to be purified (via the ensuing Holocaust).

The mission to Tibet was not the only such endeavor by the Nazis. Similar efforts to find the Aryans were dispatched to Sweden, Scotland, France and Iceland.

One German archaeologist (and eventual SS commander) Edmund Kisspromoted the idea that Bolivia's famous historical site called Tiwanaku was actually Atlantis. He believed in the elaborate and outlandish World Ice Theory, which also had support of Adolf Hitler and other top Nazis. One of the theory's postulates was that Earth at some point collided with its moon, a cataclysm that led to the destruction of Atlantis and an ice age on the planet. Trying to survive their new glacier-filled reality, ancient Atlanteans were believed to have fled to the high Andes, where life could still survive. That's how they would have ended up in Bolivia.

Hypothetical reconstructions of Tiwanaku in Edmund Kiss's book Das gläserne Meer. 1930.

While Kiss's work found enthusiastic support in Germany, especially as he wrote statements proclaiming that "the works of art and the architectural style of the prehistoric city are certainly not of Indian origin." He added that rather they were "probably the creations of Nordic men who arrived in the Andean highlands as representatives of a special civilization."

Nazis publicized such "findings" about the Nordic city of Tiwanaku in Hitler youth publications and other party newspapers. Kiss's larger Himmler-sponsored expedition to Bolivia never materialized, however, due to the start of World War 2, as writes historian Matthew Gildner.

Check out this fascinating documentary on "The Nazi Quest for the Holy Grail" which includes the search for Atlantis here:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 1811.30 -10:10

- Days ago = 1245 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I plan to continue Hey Mom posts at least twice per week but will continue to post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.