Hey, Mom! The Explanation.

Here's the permanent dedicated link to my first Hey, Mom! post and the explanation of the feature it contains.

Also,

Showing posts with label collective unconscious. Show all posts
Showing posts with label collective unconscious. Show all posts

Friday, May 9, 2025

A Sense of Doubt blog post #3734 - The Impossible Realm - More Thoughts on Grief and Nick Cave's Faith, Hope, and Carnage


A Sense of Doubt blog post #3734 - The Impossible Realm - More Thoughts on Grief and Nick Cave's Faith, Hope, and Carnage

Essentially this is my second installment in response to issues raised in the book Faith, Hope, and Carnage by Nick Cave and Seán O'Hagan.

My previous post on this book and these issues is here:

Saturday, February 8, 2025


I am a creative artist, or at least, I like to think so.

I have lived my life with my imagination as my most revered and cherished attribute and things produced by the imaginations of others as my favorite things in the world.

Yes, I am Enneagram Type Four. In the MBTI, I am INXP. (An X is a balance, so T-F balanced.)

Because I live life in my imagination, I am highly sensitive. Things affect me more deeply than they may affect others. I am easily hurt. I spend a lot of time processing my thoughts and feelings, especially the latter. Again, I have an X in the MBTI Thinking-Feeling spectrum, so those forces are both working in tandem all the time.

Some would say that my constant habitation within my imagination means that I am not reality-based and live in a fantasy world. This was definitely true when I was younger. And by younger, I mean, at least, well into my thirties, AT LEAST. This fantasy-life is less true today. I am much more reality-based, though I still retreat into my imagination all the time, especially when times are tough. After all, I am dreaming up stories, things to write, whole worlds, world-building, so even though I feel that I have a grasp on reality, I spend a lot of time in fantasy realms.

And because I retreat to my imagination, I make art, mostly writing, like this blog entry, but other things, too, like fiction and poetry. I find solace in my writing. I find value. I love doing it. Writing is among my top five self-care pursuits. I have always done it, and I always will.

Thus, when it comes to grieving, I am going to write about it, and I am going to write about it for a long time.

Today is day 3599 since my Mother died in 2015. The tenth year "anniversary" of her death will happen this year on July Fourth. In that time, I have produced most of the 3733 blog posts on Sense of Doubt. Today is post 3734. There were 50 posts prior to starting HEY MOM on July 6th, 2015. I then wrote HEY MOM for three years, daily,  that's 1095 posts. There were also 80-or-so Daily Bowie posts in 2016 along with the daily HEY MOM posts. And I have posted daily blog entries, some of which are HEY MOM posts, since quitting daily HEY MOM on July 6th, 2018. And so, all told, that's 3734 posts as of today.

Not all of those posts are about grief. The nearly 1100 consecutive HEY MOM posts are not all about grief. The blog is about life. My life. My study. Things I want to share, things I am reading, things I experience, sometimes long, and sometimes very short, and sometimes reprinted because there are 3700+ to choose from. And yes, some things I have reprinted more than once.

I have written previously about my views on grief, views which are in the process of evolving.

One of my more significant posts on the topic is here:


Friday, March 28, 2025

Today marks the 254th day since my Dad died. I was with him. I was holding his hand. I will write those sentences for the rest of my life and never feel I should hold them back. I am so honored and fortunate, so blessed, to have been with my Dad when he drew his last breath. I had wanted to be there with my Mom, too, but that didn't happen.

In that post from March 28th, I wrote about how we do not "get over" grief, and those who think they do are probably repressing. And yet, there are people in this world who will tell us that we need to "get over it," stop writing about it, talking about it, acknowledging it. Not all people. Some people. But it is a pervasive cultural belief. It amounts to "stop being such a cry baby," which should trigger many of us with memories of being bullied or even just unjustly admonished for our feelings.

Feelings are not bad; they are feelings. We are going to have them. We need to have them. We need to let them through. What's bad in regards to feelings is trying not to feel them. This is repression. It's not healthy. Also, feelings can fester, and we should avoid allowing them to spawn like a cancer and eat away at us.

Instead of telling people not to grieve, to stop grieving, we should see what we can learn from how others are experiencing and processing their grief. We are all in this together. So far, I have learned so much from others about their experiences with grief. I hope to keep learning. I am not sure if I have anything to share that is worth learning. Others will tell me if they found anything of value in what I share. I welcome that feedback.

In learning about grief and in reacting to other people's grief, empathy and compassion are nice, sure. But since we will all experience grief, and all of us will likely grieve the loss of our parents, then instead of denying that it hurts, that it should only hurt for a short time, that we all should "move on," like a gas station we used to fill our tank on a long trip, and then leave in our rear view and never visit again, we should try to learn from each other because community is powerful. We are here on this earth to form communities and help communities thrive. "Remember, when you go out in the world, hold hands and stick together." That's part of the CREDO in Everything I Need To Know I Learned in Kindergarten, one of my favorite books.

And, of course, I have shared about it a little bit:

Granted some are/were not close with either or both parents, some may die before their parents, but generally, most of us will lose our parents and will grieve them in addition to many other grieving experiences we will have in our lives, sadly, some of us, more than others.

And so, I am back for another installment about grief and things I learned from the book Faith, Hope, and Carnage by Nick Cave and Seán O'Hagan. We can all learn from these interviews as Nick Cave discusses intersections of art, religion, and the death of his son, Arthur (see the previous blog post linked above for more details); I highly recommend this book.

When Arthur died, Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds were in the process of recording their 2016 album Skeleton Tree. 

"I’ve always suspected that songwriting had a kind of secret dimension, without getting too mystical about it," Nick explained. Cave, Nick; O'Hagan, Seán. Faith, Hope and Carnage (p. 34). Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Kindle Edition. 

Some might call this "secret dimension" the state of flow, but it's more than that. There is something mystical to creating art of any kind, and writing, whether it is songs, poems, stories, or blog posts has a different element of communication than other art forms that are primarily visual, auditory, or somatic. Not that writing is superior in any way, not that it is special apart from those other arts. All art forms have their vocabularies. Writing just happens to have words as its primary vocabulary and surely a more dominant tool than in any of the other art forms. That's important to the topic of this post as well as just how the post has come to be: in words.

MORE FROM NICK: "I don’t really want to make too much out of it except to say that I think songs have a way of talking into the future. I tend to think my records are built out of an unconscious yearning for something. Whether that is a yearning for disruption, or a yearning for peace, very much depends on what I was going through at the time, but my music does often seem to be one step ahead of what is actually going on in my life.

"I guess I believe that there exists a genuine mystery at the heart of songwriting. Certain lines can appear at the time to be almost incomprehensible, but they nevertheless feel very true, very true indeed. And not just true, but necessary, and humming with a kind of unrevealed meaning. Through writing, you can enter a space of deep yearning that drags its past along with it and whispers into the future, that has an acute understanding of the way of things. You write a line that requires the future to reveal its meaning" (pp. 35-36).  

All of this that he says is true of much of my writing and definitely this blog. I often feel that I am "talking into the future" and that I am yearning for something. I am finding my way to that thing (or those things) being yearned for and often I am not reaching the things; I am still on the journey towards the things no matter how much I write, what I write, or even whether I share what is written.

Grief is like that. It's all journey into the future, it's all yearning with no end. The lost loved ones are not coming back. We can feel them. I feel my parents with me all the time. They tell me things. They hold me in their love. But they are not returning to life as they were. The yearning for them will not win out in a return. It will just go on. 

SIDENOTE: Some people see "ghosts" (for lack of a better word or concept). I do not. But I do sense my parents. I do not "hear" them in the way I hear my dog barking or my wife telling me a story, but I do "hear" them often, in my mind, with what they would say in a situation, something they would remind me of, something comforting.

These blog entries unfurl themselves much as Nick describes above but poetry even more so as it is much like the song writing that he is talking about with the incomprehensible lines whose meaning may be revealed in the future.

This is what I am doing with writing the blog posts, journals that are private, stories and poems that may some day be published, letters to friends and family, and more.

I enter this Imaginal Realm, an Impossible Realm as Nick describes in the next passage:

"... there is another place that can be summoned through practice that is not the imagination, but more a secondary positioning of your mind with regard to spiritual matters. It’s complex, and I’m not sure I can really articulate it. The priest and religious writer Cynthia Bourgeault talks about ‘the imaginal realm’, which seems to be another place you can inhabit briefly that separates itself from the rational world and is independent of the imagination. It is a kind of liminal state of awareness, before dreaming, before imagining, that is connected to the spirit itself. It is an ‘impossible realm’ where glimpses of the preternatural essence of things find their voice. Arthur lives there. Inside that space, it feels a relief to trust in certain glimpses of something else, something other, something beyond. Does that make sense?"
(p.39).

Yes, Nick, it does. This all makes PERFECT SENSE for those of us who have experienced it.

In this realm, a liminal space, (I love that word), "things find their voice."

"Imaginal" strikes me as related to the imagination and yet not specifically of the imagination, hence the liminal space between two states, despite Nick claiming that it is "independent of the imagination" and "before imagining." 

Meditation, prayer, and even lighting a candle relate to this space.

I would counter that for me, for my experience of this state, I can sense the imagination lurking, like I always feel it all around thoughts, feelings, mental states, consciousness.

But I agree that within this state of imagination and not imagination, of the mind but not the rational world, that we encounter "the preternatural essence of things." One could argue that this Impossible Realm is a state of mind connecting to the unconsciousness or even the Collective Unconscious.

MORE FROM NICK: "I think at its very least it is a private gesture that signals a willingness to hand a part of oneself over to the mysterious, in the same way that prayer is, or, indeed, the making of music. Prayer to me is about making a space within oneself where we listen to the deeper, more mysterious aspects of our nature. I’m not sure that is such a bad thing to do, right?

"...there’s something about being open and vulnerable that is conversely very powerful, maybe even transformative. For me, vulnerability is essential to spiritual and creative growth, whereas being invulnerable means being shut down, rigid, small. My experience of creating music and writing songs is finding enormous strength through vulnerability. You’re being open to whatever happens, including failure and shame. There’s certainly a vulnerability to that, and an incredible freedom.

"SEAN: The two are connected, maybe – vulnerability and freedom. 

"I think to be truly vulnerable is to exist adjacent to collapse or obliteration. In that place we can feel extraordinarily alive and receptive to all sorts of things, creatively and spiritually. It can be perversely a point of advantage, not disadvantage as one might think. It is a nuanced place that feels both dangerous and teeming with potential. It is the place where the big shifts can happen. The more time you spend there, the less worried you become of how you will be perceived or judged, and that is ultimately where the freedom is" (p. 40-41). 

Giving one's self over to the mysterious.
Being open and vulnerable.
Strength in vulnerability.
Freedom in vulnerability.
Feeling extraordinarily alive.

BIG SHIFTS CAN HAPPEN.

Since the death of my parents (and really starting when I married my wife), I feel things much more strongly than ever before, I experience things with an intensity I had not previously encountered, I am vulnerable in ways that humble and surprise me.

I feel extraordinarily alive.

Strength, freedom, openness.

It's all there before me as I experience love and grief and all the feelings that cascade through those experiences.

These are the essence of life as humans, and to be present in these experiences, present in the moment, the NOW, one cannot push down one's grief into a box deep within one's unconscious mind. Or anything really. Feel it. Feel it all. Experience it all. (Yes, I know I made a reference to a song by Feist.)

MORE

"SEAN: Yes, and nothing prepares you for it. It’s tidal and it can be capsizing. 

"That’s a good word for it – ‘capsizing’. But I also think it is important to say that these feelings I am describing, this point of absolute annihilation, is not exceptional. In fact it is ordinary, in that it happens to all of us at some time or another.

We are all, at some point in our lives, obliterated by loss. If you haven’t been by now, you will be in time – that’s for sure. And, of course, if you have been fortunate enough to have been truly loved, in this world, you will also cause extraordinary pain to others when you leave it. That’s the covenant of life and death, and the terrible beauty of grief" (pp. 41-42). 

YES.

I am just going to leave it at that.

"SEAN: We talked earlier about the act of lighting a candle, and that for me was the only thing that could still my mind. It was as if peace had descended if only for a few moments. 

Stillness is what you crave in grief. When Arthur died, I was filled with an internal chaos, a roaring physical feeling in my very being as well as a terrible sense of dread and impending doom. I remember I could feel it literally rushing though my body and bursting out the ends of my fingers. When I was alone with my thoughts, there was an almost overwhelming physical feeling coursing through me. I have never felt anything like it. It was mental torment, of course, but also physical, deeply physical, a kind of annihilation of the self – an interior screaming" (p. 42). 

"And, in that period, the idea that we all die just became so fucking palpable that it infected everything. Everyone seemed to be at the point of dying" (p. 43). 

"To be forced to grieve publicly, I had to find a means of articulating what had happened. Finding the language became, for me, the way out. There is a great deficit in the language around grief. It’s not something we are practiced at as a society, because it is too hard to talk about and, more importantly, it’s too hard to listen to. So many grieving people just remain silent, trapped in their own secret thoughts, trapped in their own minds, with their only form of company being the dead themselves" (p. 44). 

Yes, to all that.

Everyone seemed to be at the point of dying. I could see the mortality in others and that reminded me of the mortality in me. I told people to cherish their loved ones, to tell them of their love, to not take anyone they love for granted, because soon, too soon, they will be gone. I routinely ask friends how old their parents are, the status of their health, and how lucky they are to still have them in their lives. Maybe people do not need me to share those things. Or maybe these are good reminders. I make them anyway. I think it matters.

And though I am not "forced" to grieve publicly like an artist of Cave's magnitude, influence, and responsibility, like his online journal, the Red Hand Files, in which he discusses grief among other things with fans each week, I am blogging every day, and sometimes, I am grieving publicly, writing about grief, like I am right here.

And here's one of the many lessons, and the note on which I will end: 

"So many grieving people just remain silent, trapped in their own secret thoughts, trapped in their own minds, with their only form of company being the dead themselves."

Doesn't that just ring true?

What we can learn here is to not be silent, to not be trapped in our own minds.

Be in therapy.

Share with your community.

Hugs.

Discussions.

Shared experiences.

Ask people who you know have lost loved ones how they are doing, even after YEARS. Remember the anniversaries of those deaths. Be there for those people you love.

Light the way. 

Because many of my friends have not yet lost one let alone both parents. It's our job to show them what coping looks like, to help to prepare them if they choose to engage and if they choose to consider anything we share as valuable. Because maybe it isn't. Maybe it's too individual, too much of my experience, just mine, or they are not ready. I would have had a difficult time relating to the grief of a friend when I was in my 20s or even my 30s.

But here it is. Here is some coping. I cope with writing, with art, with imagination, with feeling the feelings and understanding that I can let the feelings flow through me because more feelings are coming.

It is not an all-the-time thing. I am not grieving actively and consciously in every moment of the day, but it is there, the feelings, the memories, the thoughts, and they appear at many times throughout the day, the week, the month. Often, they appear at very unexpected times and in unexpected ways.

This is also an Impossible Realm, this grief, one that I could not imagine, but it has many sides, many aspects, much to explore.

There is the "imaginal realm" that liminal sense between imagination and the rational world that is much like meditation and prayer. And there's an Impossible Realm of the world without the people we love, the people we thought would always be in the world with us, especially those people who have been with us from birth (our parents) and those for whom we have been present with since their birth (our children).

Both exist.

Both exist to be explored and experienced.

I am very grateful to Nick Cave and Seán O'Hagan, and their wonderful book Faith, Hope, and Carnage. 

I will post about what I have gleaned from it again some day in a third installment.

If intrigued and/or inspired, give it a read. I recommend listening to the audio by the two of them. It's best, such great voices and expression in their voices.

FYI, I am seeing Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds in concert tomorrow.

Thanks for tuning in.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2505.09 - 10:10

- Days ago: MOM = 3599 days ago & DAD = 254 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I post Hey Mom blog entries on special occasions. I post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day, and now I have a second count for Days since my Dad died on August 28, 2024. I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of Mom's death, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of her death and sometimes 13:40 EDT for the time of Dad's death. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

Friday, May 3, 2024

A Sense of Doubt blog post #3363 - The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows

A Sense of Doubt blog post #3363 - The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows

I had another post planned for today for a presentation I gave today for a job interview, but then I decided that I did not want to push that content to social media quite yet, not while I am under consideration for the job AND several of the people considering me are connected with my social media feeds.

So, instead, I am reaching back into the draft archive for a post that I set up to publish in 2021 and never did.

Just this share.

It's good stuff.

Thanks for tuning in.


https://www.dictionaryofobscuresorrows.com/


The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows

agnosthesia

n. the state of not knowing how you really feel about something, which forces you to sift through clues hidden in your behavior, as if you were some other person—noticing a twist of acid in your voice, an obscene amount of effort put into something trifling, or an inexplicable weight on your shoulders that makes it difficult to get out of bed.

lilo

n. a friendship that can lie dormant for years only to pick right back up instantly, as if no time had passed since you last saw each other.

midding

v. intr. feeling the tranquil pleasure of being near a gathering but not quite in it—hovering on the perimeter of a campfire, chatting outside a party while others dance inside, resting your head in the backseat of a car listening to your friends chatting up front—feeling blissfully invisible yet still fully included, safe in the knowledge that everyone is together and everyone is okay, with all the thrill of being there without the burden of having to be.





pâro
n. the feeling that no matter what you do is always somehow wrong—as if there’s some obvious way forward that everybody else can see but you, each of them leaning back in their chair and calling out helpfully, “colder, colder, colder…”

Brand new episode of The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows.

onism

n. the frustration of being stuck in just one body, that inhabits only one place at a time, which is like standing in front of the departures screen at an airport, flickering over with strange place names like other people’s passwords, each representing one more thing you’ll never get to see before you die—and all because, as the arrow on the map helpfully points out, you are here.

Altschmerz

n. weariness with the same old issues that you’ve always had—the same boring flaws and anxieties you’ve been gnawing on for years, which leaves them soggy and tasteless and inert, with nothing interesting left to think about, nothing left to do but spit them out and wander off to the backyard, ready to dig up some fresher pain you might have buried long ago.

scabulous

adj. proud of a scar on your body, which is an autograph signed to you by a world grateful for your continued willingness to play with her, even when you don’t feel like it.

YOU TUBE CHANNEL

https://www.youtube.com/c/obscuresorrows/videos


The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows

 Nov 16, 2021

THE BOOK IS HERE from Simon & Schuster: https://bit.ly/3z1RYvH 

--

Special note to my subscribers: Thank you all for your patience. In the last couple years I had already been hard at work writing the book, but then life happened: I moved abroad, my daughter Charlotte was born, and I had to have unexpected heart surgery right when Covid was at its worst. I made it through, thankfully, back to full power. And now I feel extraordinarily grateful that the book is finally here, that I lived long enough to see it happen, and that you all have stuck with me. I have no words for any of that. But I'm excited to get a chance to make more videos again. I love it.

--

“BRILLIANT” —New York Magazine

"Creates beautiful new words that we need but do not yet have."

—John Green, New York Times bestselling author of "The Fault in Our Stars"

“Koenig connects the seemingly unconnectable feelings we as humans experience on a daily basis and puts words to them. Koenig brilliantly finds a way to show, in his new words and their definitions, how we connect to ourselves and one another through feelings and emotions.” 

—BoDean Warnock, Booklist


"A beautiful little book…Whatever the half-baked, unfinished, yet-to-be-articulated emotion tumbling around in your brain, this book will find a way to name it. Koenig has a cunning ability to parse out emotions in a very specific way and pin them down into actual articulation, both in the word he creates itself and its poetic definition and etymology. There is joy to be found in every nook and cranny of this book.”

—Michigan Daily Review


The original Backrooms image posted on 4chan in 2019

https://boingboing.net/2020/12/15/the-quiet-horror-of-procedural-generation.html

The quiet horror of procedural generation


The following is from my newsletter, The Magnet. There's a free version and a subscriber version. I hope you'll check it out! — Mark

That feeling from being the only one in a building is called kenopsia. The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows defines kenopsia as "the eerie, forlorn atmosphere of a place that's usually bustling with people but is now abandoned and quiet." Photos of kenopsic places — abandoned shopping malls, empty airports, school hallways late at night, and other lonely places that evoke feelings of disassociation and disquiet — are popular online. The most famous kenopsic photo is the one of The Backrooms.

According to Know Your Meme, The Backrooms originated on 4chan in 2019 when someone posted a photo, taken at an uneasy angle, of a dingy yellow room illuminated by fluorescent lights. There's no furniture or people. The wallpaper, reminiscent of a 1980s hotel conference room, is mismatched. The carpeting has large stains. A divider at the far end hints at an entrance to another, possibly similar room. A 4chan reader's comment about the photo marks the first use of The Backrooms:

If you're not careful and no-clip out of reality in wrong areas, you'll end up in the backrooms, where it's nothing but the stink of moist carpet, the madness of mono-yellow, and endless background noise of fluorescent lights at maximum hum-buzz, and approximately six hundred million square miles of randomly segmented empty rooms to be trapped in. God save you if you hear something wandering around nearby, because it sure as hell has heard you…

The Backrooms quickly spread beyond 4chan. In the weeks and months to follow, people wrote programs that simulated the "six hundred million square miles of randomly segmented empty rooms." Some of these panic-inducing mazes became the basis for Backrooms games, the object of which is to escape without going crazy.

The Backrooms also inspired a wiki, called Backrooms Database. It's a collaborative writing site where fans "create new Levels, Entities, Objects, Tales, and the rest of the lore, to create a cohesive universe." You can read reports from members of the M.E.G. (Major Explorers' Group) who have ventured deep into the Backrooms and have taken photos of newly discovered rooms and hallways (all of which are, of course, kenopsic) and cataloged the lifeforms that inhabit the lower levels, such as skin stealers, hounds, and facelings.

The Backrooms reminds me of "Report on an Unidentified Space Station," a 1982 short story by J.G. Ballard about a crew of space travelers who make an emergency landing on an abandoned space station. (I read it in the excellent Semiotext(e) SF anthology from 1989, edited by Rudy Rucker, Robert Anton Wilson, and Peter Lambhorn Wilson.) The story is told in the form of eight "survey reports." In the first report, the nameless author gives their first impression of the spacecraft:

Although of elderly construction it is soundly designed and in good working order, and seems to have been used in recent times as a transit depot for travelers resting at mid-point in their journeys. Its interior consists of a series of open passenger concourses, with comfortably equipped lounges and waiting rooms. As yet we have not been able to locate the bridge or control centre. We assume that the station was one of many satellite drogues surrounding a large command unit, and was abandoned when a decline in traffic left it surplus to the needs of the parent transit system

They estimate the station to be 500 meters across. But as they explore its well-lit lounges and hallways, they slowly realize that the station is much larger than they initially surmised. From "Survey Report 2":

We began by setting out across the central passenger concourse that separates the two hemispheres of the station. This wide deck is furnished with thousands of tables and chairs. But on reaching the high partition doors 200 metres away we discovered that the restaurant deck is only a modest annex to a far larger concourse. An immense roof three storeys high extends across an open expanse of lounges and promenades. We explored several of the imposing staircases, each equipped with a substantial mezzanine, and found that they lead to identical concourses above and below.

The space station has clearly been used as a vast transit facility, comfortably accommodating many thousands of passengers. There are no crew quarters or crowd control posts. The absence of even a single cabin indicates that this army of passengers spent only a brief time here before being moved on, and must have been remarkable self-disciplined or under powerful restraint.

They revise their estimation of the size of the station to be one mile in diameter. With each subsequent report, they realize the station is vastly larger than they'd imagined.

In the ninth and final report, the scout estimates the diameter of the space station to be at least 15,000 light-years:

We have accepted the limitless size of the station, and this awareness fills us with feelings that are almost religious. Our instruments confirm what we have long suspected, that the empty space across which we traveled from our own solar system in fact lies within the interior of the station, one of many vast lacunae set in its endlessly curving walls.

The Backrooms, and Ballard's story, made me curious about procedural generation, a process that can be used to automatically create endless virtual architecture, among other things. (Check out the Procedural Generation subreddit for lots of cool examples of what can be done with procedural generation.) A specific procedural generation technique called a "wave function collapse algorithm" is commonly used to create worlds like The Backrooms. This beginner's guide to "wave function collapse algorithms" helped me understand how they work.

Here's a video of an infinite city built using the wave function collapse algorithm:


Infinite procedurally generated city in Unity

This video of a city built from a limited set of architectural elements combined in endlessly different ways feels very much like Ballard's space station. Near the end of the video, you can see how the buildings are generated in realtime as you approach the edge of the city. There's no escape from this place.

It's not surprising that kenopsic spaces have become a phenomenon in the era of COVID-19. They represent the millions of unused schools, theaters, office buildings, museums, and libraries worldwide. Just thinking about them triggers a sense of Ballardian dread. Here's hoping we find our way out of this space station we've all been trapped in for the past year.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2405.03 - 10:10

- Days ago =  3227
had been scheduled for 2189 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I plan to continue Hey Mom posts at least twice per week but will continue to post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

Saturday, April 13, 2024

A Sense of Doubt blog post #3343 - Dune, Religion, and Psychedelic Spice



A Sense of Doubt blog post #3343 - Dune, Religion, and Psychedelic Spice


I have shared from this newsletter before, and I liked this one especially well and so sharing again.

Fixed some spelling but left some of the British variations.

Thanks for tuning in.


Dune, Religion and Psychedelic Spice

A Paradox of Power and God

∙
GUEST POST
Via Psychedlic Press newsletter


Creative Commons 3.0 - ‘Fan art of a sandworm from Dune’ by Astronimation

‘Much that was called religion has carried an unconscious attitude of hostility toward life. True religion must teach that life is filled with joys pleasing to the eye of God, that knowledge without action is empty. All men must see that the teaching of religion by rules and rote is largely a hoax. The proper teaching is recognized with ease. You can know it without fail because it awakens within you that sensation which tells you this is something you’ve always known.’ – Dune


Dune has taken the world by (sand)storm. While the recent film takes a mocking stance on religion, the narrative and the original books paint a much more nuanced picture of the place of religion, and psychedelics, in the world.

The novel represents religion as having a dual nature. The first and most familiar in our age is religion as a tool of power. We see this through the protagonist Paul Atreides’ use of the shadowy Bene Gesserit’s prophecy, which they proliferated amongst the Fremen, allowing him to transform into a religious figure of power they follow into Jihad.

While the recent film predictably mocks the Fremen’s religious fanaticism, we should note that Paul really is a character with mystical abilities of prescience and ancestral awareness. And with the help of a psychedelic spice and the Water of Life, he embodies the Kwisatz Haderach; the religious figure the Bene Gesserit sought to create and control. The Fremen’s religious fanaticism for what is a truly religious figure isn’t really all that silly. Not to recognise one, not to recognise real religion, is the true hubris of our age.

However, this is not without problems. Friedrich Nietzsche taught us that religious faith is just a means to control people. A command from an earthly authority, like a government, holds some power. We don’t ordinarily go around breaking all the laws. However, if a command comes from an all-powerful, omnipresent, omniscient God, then this command holds a lot more weight – especially if that God rewards or punishes you with eternal heaven or hell.

It follows then, that anyone who claims to be in league with this God, gains a new degree of power. This is Nietzsche’s story of religion and priestly authority. If on the Church’s side is an all-powerful God, and priests claim to have the exclusive ability to be in communion with Him (Her? It? Them?), then the Church gains a similar level of power. Yet this idea of God as some kind of all-powerful sky tyrant is at odds with the God of what I call ‘real religion’.

The second reading of religion, the second aspect of religion’s dual nature, is that the God of real religion is the God of mysticism, and this is a very different God than the one portrayed by the organised Church. In fact, not only are these two understandings of God very different, they are, as we shall see, mutually exclusive.

The God of mysticism is the God one finds during a mystical experience. As scientist Tom Roberts argues, following a psychedelic-induced mystical experience, ‘religion really is about something. It’s about an experience people can have.’¹[i] It is a well-defined phenomenon. We even have a questionnaire for it!

The God of mysticism is not a sky tyrant. Rather, the God of mysticism is found in the mystical experience of Unity, Noetic Truth, Transcendence of Space and Time, a Sense of Sacredness, Deeply Felt Positive Mood, Paradoxicality and Ineffability. Notice here some of the similarities with the psychedelic spice-induced insights of Paul Atreides.

Paul, for instance, can see through time, he transcends it. Paul then is a mystic, a figure of real religion, who knows the God of mysticism. He said, ‘The spice changes anyone who gets this much of it, but… I could bring the change to consciousness. I don’t get to leave it in the unconscious… I can see it.’ And here is the key understanding: no person or group can legitimately use the God of mysticism as a tool of power.

Like the priests of our own history, Paul and his religious claim to be Emperor is based on him being in league with God. But, if God is paradoxicality and ineffability, if God is an experience, and if God is not a sky tyrant who can punish, reward, and send us to heaven or hell, then what power does this God really provide? None at all.

How could a paradoxical or ineffable God form commandments? ‘Do not kill’, in a paradoxical form would be ‘Do kill and do not kill’, which doesn’t make for a very powerful commandment. And, even more damning, an ineffable God cannot even be put into words, let alone the words ‘do’ ‘not’ and ‘kill’, or any other imperative. Power gained through knowledge of God is not real power if that knowledge cannot be communicated.

For those who have undergone the mystical experience the claim to have knowledge of God is semi-legitimate. Those people really have had a union with God. However, this knowledge is paradoxical, ineffable, and once the mystical experience is over, this knowledge dissipates. Therefore, any claim to power based on the mystical experience is a false one. As Alfred North Whitehead ironically puts it, ‘the Church gave unto God the attributes which belonged exclusively to Caesar.’²[ii]

We see this powerlessness in the real religion of Paul Atreides. He increasingly becomes united with his visions of the future to the point he feels he cannot change it. Although Paul uses his mystical visions to claim power on earth even he recognises this claim to power is a sham: In Dune Messiah, he says, ‘What? Deny my own oracle? How can I when I've seen it fulfilled thousands of times? People call it a power, a gift. It's an affliction! It won't let me leave my life where I found it.’

So, religion has a mutually exclusive, dual nature. Organised religion is a tool of power, real religion is a mystical experience that cannot legitimately be used for power. Where do psychedelics come in? And what about Dune’s psychedelic spice? The means to Paul’s mystical awakening in Dune is the spice and later on The Water of Life, another drug created in the lifecycle of the sandworms. The psychedelic overtones cannot be missed:

‘Here is the Water of Life, the water that is greater than water—Kan, the water that frees the soul. If you be a Reverend Mother, it opens the universe to you. Let Shai-hulud judge now.’

Psychedelics, then, are a means to real religion. Several psychedelic studies have shown that the mystical experience is reliably reproducible under scientific conditions – God is reliably reproducible under scientific conditions! In this respect, the science vs religion debate is surely over. Once one has a mystical experience, and understands for oneself that it is not a source of power, then one can see that those who claim power through it, and claim power through knowledge of God, are partaking in a hoodwink and a sham.

Psychedelics, therefore, are power dissolving drugs. This is what we learn from Dune and also from Nietzsche. For although the reading of Nietzsche we began with has become commonplace, and has in a very real sense, become our culture, it tells only half the story. The other half is psychedelic.

Nietzsche had psychedelic-like experiences and is known to have used drugs with psychoactive effects.³[iii] When he refers to the mystical experience of Unity during the psychedelic Eleusinian Mysteries, he refers to it as the ‘Oneness amidst the paroxysms of intoxication’.⁴[iv] Similarly, in regard to the Transcendence, he writes, ‘In… intoxication there is… the retardation of the feelings of time and space.’⁵[v]

His philosophy, I argue in my book The Psychedelic Nietzsche, centres around the role of psychedelically-induced mystical experiences in our culture, and how they are antagonistic to the organised Church that Nietzsche so despised. Nietzsche saw that the psychedelically-induced mystical experience leads to the realisation that the Church’s claim to power is a sham.

Dune and Nietzsche’s thought both centre around the interplay between religion as power and the real religion inducible by psychedelic means. Religion as power has ruled for the last 2000 years and, as Nietzsche proclaimed, our modern culture still lives under the shadow of that God. It is high time for real religion. We must learn from both Nietzsche and Dune. Nietzsche tells us to live artistically, and to love our fate in spite of suffering – amor fati. Dune adds a warning: we must not mistake our visions for our fate.





+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2404.13 - 10:10

- Days ago = 3207 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I plan to continue Hey Mom posts at least twice per week but will continue to post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.