Hey, Mom! The Explanation.

Here's the permanent dedicated link to my first Hey, Mom! post and the explanation of the feature it contains.

Also,

Friday, March 13, 2026

A Sense of Doubt blog post #4043 - Pride Flag Removed - Pride Flag Returned - Don't mess with PRIDE



A Sense of Doubt blog post #4043 - Pride Flag Removed - Pride Flag Returned - Don't mess with PRIDE

Hateful Trump administration removes Pride flag from Stonewall National Monument.

The people of New York put it back.

Thanks for your attention to this matter.

Trump administration removes Pride flag from Stonewall National Monument, a major LGBTQ landmark

Jo Yurcaba
3 min read



The National Park Service removed a Pride flag from the Stonewall National Monument in New York City on Monday — the latest in a series of actions from the Trump administration that remove recognition of LGBTQ people from the historic site.

The monument recognizes the Stonewall Inn, a Manhattan gay bar that was the site of a 1969 uprising widely considered a turning point in the modern LGBTQ rights movement. President Barack Obama designated Christopher Park, which is across the street from the bar, a national monument in 2016. The park service has flown Pride flags within the park since then.

In a statement Tuesday, a park service spokesperson cited Interior Department guidance issued last month, which requires that “only the US flag and other congressionally or departmentally authorized flags are flown on NPS-managed flagpoles, with limited exceptions,” the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson added: “Any changes to flag displays are made to ensure consistency with that guidance. Stonewall National Monument continues to preserve and interpret the site’s historic significance through exhibits and programs.”

New York officials criticized the flag’s removal, which was first reported by Gay City News, a New York City-based LGBTQ news site.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani blasted the move and vowed to protect the LGBTQ community in the city.

"I am outraged by the removal of the Rainbow Pride Flag from Stonewall National Monument. New York is the birthplace of the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement, and no act of erasure will ever change, or silence, that history," Mamdani said in a statement on social media.

"Our city has a duty not just to honor this legacy, but to live up to it," he said. "I will always fight for a New York City that invests in our LGBTQ+ community, defends their dignity, and protects every one of our neighbors—without exception."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called the decision “a deeply outrageous action that must be reversed right now.”

“Stonewall is a landmark because it is the birthplace of the modern LGBTQ rights movement, and symbols of that legacy belong there by both history and principle,” Schumer said in a statement Tuesday. “New Yorkers are right to be outraged, but if there’s one thing I know about this latest attempt to rewrite history, stoke division and discrimination, and erase our community pride it’s this: that flag will return. New Yorkers will see to it.”

State Sen. Erik Bottcher, whose district includes the park, said in a statement on social media that “Stonewall is where our community fought back and demanded to be seen. You cannot separate that place from the symbol that grew out of it.”

Removing the flag is the administration’s latest effort to remove and censure parts of the monument’s history. Last year, following an executive order in which Trump declared there are only two, unchangeable sexes, references to queer and transgender people were erased from the Stonewall National Monument’s webpage.

The page used to say “LGBTQ+,” according to an archived version of the website. Last February, the page was changed to mention only lesbian, gay and bisexual people, with related pages using “LGB” as the initialism for the community. A similar change was rolled out across federal agency websites.

The Trump administration has rolled out a list of policy changes targeting the trans community. In the first few weeks of his second presidency, Trump issued executive orders prohibiting trans people from enlisting and serving in the military, barring trans girls and women from competing on female sports teams in federally funded K-12 schools and colleges and barring federal funding from going to hospitals that provide transition-related care to minors.

This article was originally published on NBCNews.com




https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000010709797/stonewall-flag-protest-nyc.html

Pride Flag Returns to Stonewall, Defying Federal Order

Hundreds gathered near the historic Stonewall Inn to watch the Pride flag being hoisted at a monument honoring the L.G.B.T.Q. rights movement. The flag had been taken down after the Trump administration issued a new directive for national parks.

“I think it’s a beautiful thing and it should always fly here.” “When I heard about it, I just got so sad and then so mad. Not in my town. This is history. It’s a memorial.” “This is the one monument that’s stood up and stood for the queer community, and we need to keep it going.” “They’re probably going to take it down again, maybe, but it’ll just go back up.” “I think community events like these help show that people aren’t alone and we have each other. We have a community to lean on.”




+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2603.13 - 10:10

- Days ago: MOM = 3907 days ago & DAD = 561 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I post Hey Mom blog entries on special occasions. I post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day, and now I have a second count for Days since my Dad died on August 28, 2024. I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of Mom's death, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of her death and sometimes 13:40 EDT for the time of Dad's death. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

Thursday, March 12, 2026

A Sense of Doubt blog post #4042 - Letter to Dad #26 - the Dangers of Cooking


A Sense of Doubt blog post #4042 - Letter to Dad #26 - the Dangers of Cooking

Hey Big Guy (Dad),

Once again, I am postponing my "Seeing Bowie Live" post with photos of your little black books to work on it some more.

And I had a big kitchen accident yesterday, worth sharing.

These are not my pictures. I forgot to take pictures. Faced with a huge mess, I just focused on cleaning it up and keeping the dogs out of the kitchen where there was a mine field of broken glass.

I was baking a beef brisket. I had not read the directions closely enough as they clearly instructed me to use a ROASTING PAN.

However, I was very focused on using this Pyrex pan, which had Shawarma Chicken in it. I knew I need to transfer the chicken and clean out the pan.

The recipe called for a dry rub and baking at 350 for an hour. Then remove the pan, add beef broth, and cook at 300 for two hours. 

I took the pan out and started adding room temperature beef broth, and the Pyrex pan exploded.

I wanted to save the brisket as it was expensive. The bottom of the pan splintered in whole, big pieces with the sides exploding in all directions.

I examined the meat, and I was pretty sure it did not have glass in it.

But we decided not take chances. Swallowing glass is a bad idea as you can imagine.

I spent the next couple of hours cleaning up, and a day later, I still need to mop the floors, which I was going to do anyway.

APPARENTLY, this is a thing about Pyrex pans.

"Sadly, this is typical of pyrex (all lowercase) pieces. They are made of soda-lime glass, which is not made to withstand extreme temperature changes.

PYREX (uppercase) is made of borosilicate glass, which IS built to withstand temperature changes."


Also, 


The Jan. 2011 Consumer Reports has an article on Pyrex & Anchor Hocking baking dishes exploding. In brief, these companies changed the kind of glass they used somewhere in the 1980’s and the cheaper glass  shatters at lower temperatures than the kind used in older models and European bakeware.
The cautions:

***1) always place hot dish on a dry towel or pot holder. Never on  a cold or wet surface, the top of the stove, a damp towel, a countertop, or metal trivet.
2) Don’t place directly on a burner or under the broiler.  (Probably not in a toaster-oven either)
3) Always preheat oven before putting in dish.
4) Cover bottom of dish with liquid before cooking meat or veg.
5) Don’t add liquid to hot glassware.  (basting in or out of the oven)
6) Don’t take dishes directly from freezer to oven or vice versa.
7) Discard any with chips, scratches, or cracks.

Number 1 is probably the most important and one I did not know.  Most of my pieces are old and probably okay—but I won’t be buying any more!  Higher temperatures also seemed to be a factor, so I will cook dressing in a big corning ware roaster!




Undeterred, I am going to get another brisket and try again, this time in the metal roasting pan even though I am not sure how to "cover it tightly" other than with aluminum foil.

In other news, I got 100% scores on both assignments causing me angst last week.

I took Ellory to the vet for diarrhea and lack of appetite yesterday, and we going to try antibiotic treatment plus de-wormer and probiotic. We are also going to check for cancer as she has lost ten pounds since January.

Before I start all that (except the high potency probiotic) I had to get a stool sample of her diarrhea. She doesn't like me to see her poop. I followed her outside almost half a dozen times until she finally pooped this morning, and it was a fully formed poop! Not diarrhea. So now I don't know what to think unless the probiotic I gave her last night worked so fast to heal her gut that it stopped the diarrhea.

She's also been eating more. So, that's good.

I am struggling with depression, and now that I am studying to be a mental health provider, I can text myself. I rated myself a 17 on the PHQ-9, which indicates moderately severe depression. I told my therapist that I rated myself a little higher than what's true because I always rate myself well under what is happening. In any case, after talking about it with my therapist, I feel much better, like a veil had lifted, which is weird. I don't think it was JUST talking to my therapist but that was definitely a large part of it. I am always tempted to write him about these follow ups but I also respect his time and know that sharing these things is what the appointments are for.

I am re-reading DIE, which I wrote about Sunday and will write about this Sunday.

Time to deliver the poop sample and get another brisket.

Love you Dad.

Saying I miss you (and Mom) at the end of each of these messages does not convey how much I actually miss you.

But I do miss you a lot.

Love, 
christopher




Ellory Queen 2602.22


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2603.12 - 10:10

- Days ago: MOM = 3906 days ago & DAD = 560 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I post Hey Mom blog entries on special occasions. I post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day, and now I have a second count for Days since my Dad died on August 28, 2024. I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of Mom's death, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of her death and sometimes 13:40 EDT for the time of Dad's death. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

A Sense of Doubt blog post #4041 - Avoiding the Bait and Switch in Fiction - Writing Wednesday for 2603.11



A Sense of Doubt blog post #4041 - Avoiding the Bait and Switch in Fiction - Writing Wednesday for 2603.11

I had scheduled a post on fantasy tropes, which I am delaying to spend more time working on it.

This one is an easy one-off.

I am continuing my study of fantasy literature and general writing advice as I work on my own book (actually books, but I haven't touched more than one in months).

So, I am reprinting more from the great Mythcreants blog, and I urge you to like, subscribe, and even become a patron.

Thanks for tuning in!!


How to Avoid Writing a Bait-and-Switch Story

If you don't know what expectations you're setting, readers may feel cheated by your end.

https://mythcreants.com/blog/how-to-avoid-writing-a-bait-and-switch-story/

Author
Posted on November 5, 2021

No writer drafts their novel hoping to trick readers into consuming something they won’t like. But unless we know what type of story we’ve promised during our beginning, our middle or end could make readers feel like they’ve been handed a different book. At best, this makes the story feel lopsided and breaks immersion. At worst, our audience may feel cheated. Let’s cover what a story’s defining characteristics are and how we can change them gracefully.

The Defining Traits of a Story

Audiences expect these aspects to be mostly consistent throughout a story.

Important Characters

Of all defining features, a story’s central cast is probably the most important and the most commonly botched. That’s why I wrote a whole post about character expectations way back in the day. The problem is that everyone has strong feelings about characters, including the storyteller.

Because we roughly control who our audience gets attached to, this is usually okay. By establishing a character as the main character in our opening, we’ve told the audience that they can hang their heart on that person. The catch is that once the audience gets attached, we can’t erase those feelings or transfer them to another character. Inevitably, some storytellers fall in love with a new character partway through writing the story and don’t do the revisions required to make them the main character from the start. Other times, a storyteller just thinks that switching the main character is a clever twist. Either way, their audience will feel cheated by this change.

In narrated work, readers expect that the first viewpoint character is the main character. If the work doesn’t have character viewpoints, the audience will look for the character who is being followed by a real or metaphorical camera. If that person dies or is even just downgraded to a secondary character, the audience could get upset. The longer the opening of the story stays with a character who isn’t the main character, the more alienating it can be when people discover the character they’ve been following isn’t important.

Once the main character is established, they need to play the role a main character is supposed to play – solving the story’s biggest problems, particularly at the climax. If other characters take over the story or someone swoops in to save the day instead of the main character, that won’t be received well.

Luckily, the rules for other characters are more malleable. Audiences should feel the presence of all important characters during the first third of the story. Not only does it feel weird if a central character strolls in halfway through, but also the later you introduce a character, the less time you’ll have to develop them.

Generally, you should avoid making a side character feel important in your opening only to have them fade away later. That doesn’t mean everyone in the beginning has to be critical to the end. However, if they become less important as the book continues, you’ll want to de-emphasize them. Don’t give them a detailed description, don’t spend time getting to know them as a person, don’t make it look like they have unresolved issues to follow up on. Sometimes, you won’t even want to name them.

Worldview

By worldview, I mean the unique combination of factors that create the environment of the story. That includes:

  • World or setting: Your story could be set in a fantasy world, a far-future earth, the underwater ruins of Atlantis, or a small tourist town in the mountains. This comes with expectations about the setting’s scope. Will characters be traveling across the galaxy or staying in the same village?
  • Theme: This is the concepts and aesthetics that unify your setting and make it unique. Your tourist mountain town might be kitschy and folksy, your fantasy world might be populated by colorful fairies living in giant flowers, and your far-future earth might be a corporate hellscape of chrome and plastic.
  • Atmosphere and tone: Is this a whimsical story where no one gets hurt in a fight, a gritty story where side characters die from stab wounds, or a romantic tragedy where knights and ladies suffer beautifully as they bemoan their fate?

These worldview factors inform audiences where the story takes place, what elements do or don’t appear in the world, how forgiving the universe is, how realistic events will be, and what emotions the story will evoke. This allows them to judge whether your story will deliver the type of experience they want. They might love those flower houses and decide to keep reading, or they might decide the story feels too silly and find something more to their liking.

Just as important, these expectations are what allows audiences to suspend disbelief. If realism is low and characters seem to dodge bullets or race up walls, that will be believable as long as it’s consistent. The same goes for fairies with wings that are obviously too small to hold them up in the air. But once you depict scenes with higher realism, change the tone dramatically, or insert high-tech gadgets in a magical world, anything unrealistic will stand out and the whole story will start feeling invented.

This doesn’t mean the worldview should stay exactly the same. Stories need some variety in mood from scene to scene, and gradually making the worldview a little darker and more serious is also just fine.

Plot

The biggest thing that distinguishes a plot of any story is its throughline. We have lots of material on that elsewhere, and your throughline is more about whether specific events match than the type of story you’re telling. Instead, let’s look at the ways your plot influences the general experience you’re offering.

  • Internal versus external arcs: While most stories have arcs running the full range of internal to external, the emphasis varies from story to story. Your story might spend the most time on internal character growthcharacter relationships, or the external problems they face out in the world.
  • Types of conflicts: Your character might spend lots of time sneaking around, trying to charm or persuade others, engaging in physical combat, or solving engineering problems. While any story should have variety in conflicts, the palette of conflicts will look different from story to story. One story might include lots of socializing, thievery, and the occasional desperate escape, while another will include lots of fights scenes and struggles to survive in a harsh environment.
  • Level of tension: Tension determines the amount of excitement and stress. If the first half of the story is lighthearted character drama and the second half is a struggle to get away as a monster picks people off one by one, the story is delivering two very different levels of tension.

All of these factors will be expected to change as the story continues. The tension should rise and peak at the climax. To raise tension, the plot will often emphasize external arcs and conflicts with higher stakes, such as fight scenes. However, these factors can still change too dramatically. If internal arcs and social conflicts are the dominant experience in the first third of the story, they should still be important in the last third.

Style

Many authors are popular because readers like the style of their narration. That includes everything that makes narration distinct: word choice, personality, tone, amount of description, point of view, etc. Some writers work in lots of jokes, others have a simple style that makes for a breezy read, and yet others write prose that’s graceful and poetic.

Generally, the style should not be perfectly uniform from scene to scene. It may change a little depending on the mood of the moment, and an exciting scene calls for tighter prose than a slow one. Description may also become less necessary as the story proceeds, since more story elements will already be familiar. However, much of a novel’s style should remain consistent.

This becomes an issue when a writer puts lots of energy into wordcraft during their opening and then stops bothering by the end. Depending on the writer, this could mean descriptions or jokes disappear, or it could mean the writing feels increasingly cluttered as the story goes on. Two writers collaborating can also create abrupt style transitions. Copy editing can help even out some aspects of inconsistent prose, but a copy editor won’t write your jokes for you.

While the point of view may shift during the story, readers do expect it to follow the rules you laid out. Those are determined by your narrative premise – the implied explanation for how the story is being told. If you tell readers they’re looking at a personal journal and then switch to an omniscient narrator for the next chapter, they may feel disoriented and annoyed. While this should be avoided, in most cases that won’t be enough for them to put down a good book.

Ways to Transition Gracefully

While audiences will expect consistency by default, that doesn’t mean you can’t change those expectations. If you plan to make big changes in your story, you can avoid misleading your audience by giving them a heads up. The earlier you modify their expectations, the better, but it must be in the first third of the story at least.

Continuous Change

The first method still requires consistency, but in this case, you’re adding consistent change. Think of this as setting a trajectory for the story. As long as your audience can see the direction it’s heading, they’ll know roughly what to expect.

Let’s say your story is low tension but high in realism. Your main character is a barista who has relatable problems with unfriendly customers. However, you’d like to make the end tense and surreal – the barista will be descending into a hole in the universe that metaphorically represents their existential anxiety. Instead of a big twist later where your barista is plunged into this metaphorical world, you would start by adding surreal touches to their workday. Maybe each time a customer is mean, another small hole appears, and only the main character can see them. These holes cause problems that raise tension, until eventually there are so many holes in the floor that it crumbles, sending the character falling into the center of the universe.

While you are doing this, you could slowly modify the style of your narration to fit the increasingly tense and surreal experience. The change in style might emphasize how the point-of-view character is succumbing to existential anxiety. However, style should follow substance, so I don’t recommend transitioning your style if no other defining features of the story are changing.

While you can use continuous change to raise the importance of side characters, you can’t use it to change who your main character is. Gradually changing the main character will still make people mad.

Foreshadowing

In this case, foreshadowing means mentioning future elements so that when they finally appear, they won’t feel out of the blue. Let’s take characters. Whereas the continuous change strategy would mean introducing a background character and then slowly increasing their importance, you could instead foreshadow an important character by bringing up their name several times. This is particularly handy when an important character is off conquering the neighboring kingdom and hasn’t yet arrived to conquer this one. The conqueror might feature in the latest news from abroad or come up during political discussions.

Alternately, perhaps no one knows who is leaving strange marks all over the town, but it’s clear that someone is doing it. Just keep in mind that if you leave a foreshadowed character too mysterious, your audience will expect a big reveal that it’s a character they’ve already met. To avoid this, provide enough details to make it clear this is someone new.

In my example of a barista that ends up falling into a hole in the universe, the idea of that big hole and other surreal metaphors could be explored in a variety of ways. Pictures of it could be featured in art, the character could use it to describe how they feel, or they might see it during their nightmares. However, the hole isn’t the only thing that requires foreshadowing. If the beginning of the story doesn’t have any fantastical elements, it’s also important to foreshadow that the laws of the universe will be broken. Maybe the character starts to believe that reality isn’t what it looks like, and soon its true nature will be revealed. Then the hole appears.

No, this method won’t allow you to change your main character, either. Don’t change your main character.

Symmetrical Framing

Take wherever you’re planning to go with your story, and put a few chapters of it in the beginning. Then once you transition out of that and into the beginning you’d previously planned, you can return without breaking expectations.

While adding a chunk to the beginning sounds simple, in practice there are some pitfalls. Foremost, I strongly recommend against adding some prologue-like chapter that has little connection to your opening. This will make your opening hook weaker and test the audience’s patience as they wait for the opening to become relevant. Instead, your new beginning should feature the main character and ideally take place right before your old opening in the timeline. For instance, if the first half of your novel takes place on Earth and the second half on an alien planet, start your main character on that alien planet – or a different alien location – before they go down to Earth.

You also don’t want to jar your audience when you transition to your old opening. The material you add to the beginning should be long enough to establish the importance of the story elements you feature, but short enough that expectations haven’t crystalized. Generally, it should be less than 1/6 of the length of the work.

This method is also not a great match for a big jump in tension. Tension needs to slowly escalate in jagged steps; if you append a really high-tension opening, it’ll make the next stage of your story feel boring. So while my barista facing an existential crisis may have a surreal experience in the opening, they shouldn’t be fighting to escape a galactic hole, lest it transform my coffee shop scenes into a snoozefest.

You can use this method to establish characters who will be important in the later parts of the story, but again, don’t change your main character.

Dual Themes

Last, you can establish two different sets of conventions for your story, provided you have an in-story explanation. That includes when the main character:

  • Goes to a new world or otherwise enters a different environment
  • Falls asleep or gets high
  • Plays make-believe
  • Experiences flashbacks or flash-forwards

The barista in my example might deal with their normal high-realism job during the day, then once the sun sets, their environment could become surreal and threatening. If placed correctly, these night scenes could still be much higher tension than those during the day. A different set of side characters might also show up at night, though you’d have to avoid putting in so many characters total that they’re hard to keep straight.

Your audience will notice the pattern of when, how often, and for how long you use one set of conventions or the other. Plan to use your secondary set of conventions at least three times total, and spread them out evenly if you can. If you have to vary it somewhat, it won’t be a showstopper. However, you still have to establish the pattern you’re using early in the story.

Okay, yes, you could potentially use this to alternate the primary character without violating expectations. But that doesn’t mean you should. Since this is basically adding another viewpoint, please see my cranky notes on multiple viewpoints. Then whatever you do, make sure the character who plays the biggest role during your climax gets the most screen time, especially in the beginning.


Once you understand what your audience needs, you can do lots of fun and even experimental things. However, an audience can tell the difference between when a writer throws cool things in the story on an impulse and when they put thought into it. Take more time and care with fewer story elements, lest your eyes outgrow your stomach.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2603.11

- Days ago: MOM = 3905 days ago & DAD = 559 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I post Hey Mom blog entries on special occasions. I post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day, and now I have a second count for Days since my Dad died on August 28, 2024. I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of Mom's death, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of her death and sometimes 13:40 EDT for the time of Dad's death. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

A Sense of Doubt blog post #4040 - Did Alzheimer's Affect Terry Pratchett's Discworld?




A Sense of Doubt blog post #4040 - Did Alzheimer's Affect Terry Pratchett's Discworld?

This recent video from Rebecca Watson, whom I follow, caught my eye.

I needed a quick share as I am busy this week.

This video is worth your time, but if you'd rather not watch, the full transcript is reprinted below.

Even though I do not always agree with her, Watson is very worth following with a subscription on You Tube or even a Patreon subscription.  The links below will guide you to either or both.

Thanks for tuning in.





Watson video






https://www.patreon.com/posts/did-alzheimers-152181726
Did Alzheimer's Impact Terry Pratchett's Discworld?

Rebecca Watson




I have a variety of techniques I use to deal with the ongoing collapse of everything, most of them different kinds of drugs. But I also have healthy habits, like reading, and when it comes to reading purely for pleasure, I find myself turning back again and again to Terry Pratchett’s Discworld series.

If you aren’t familiar, “Discworld” is a sprawling collection of stories that blend fantasy, adventure, and satire, often with recurring characters popping up here and there. There are guides online to help people decide what order to read them in, with some focusing on starting with the best bangers and others that focus on following one character through the years. When I started reading them a few years ago, I took the completely insane tactic of reading them in the order that they were published and not really thinking too much about them. So far, I have enjoyed this approach and highly recommend it to others.



Because I’m pretty much always in the middle of a Discworld novel, I perked up to recently see an entire scientific study about that series: “Detecting Dementia Using Lexical Analysis: Terry Pratchett’s Discworld Tells a More Personal Story,” published last month in Brain Sciences.

Now, this is going to get a little sad but it’s old news to most: Pratchett published 41 Discworld novels (and even more one-offs) between 1983 and 2015. In 2007 at the age of 59, he announced that he had been diagnosed with a rare form of early-onset Alzheimer's disease. He died in 2015 at the age of 66 from complications of that disease.

Alzheimer’s and other kinds of dementia can be difficult to diagnose before symptoms become very obvious and life-altering, which leads to worse outcomes for patients who don’t catch it early enough for interventions. And so, a lot of research has been done to figure out new ways to detect dementia as early as possible. One of these research avenues involves identifying very subtle changes in the way a person uses language, and so back in 2005 neuroscientists decided to examine the works of novelist Iris Murdoch to see if they could detect changes in her writing throughout the span of her 40-year career. Murdoch’s final novel was published in 1995 and received uncharacteristically negative reviews. Shortly thereafter, she was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s and died in 1999 at the age of 79. The researchers compared that last novel to her first novel as well as one she wrote at the height of her career, and found that “Whilst there were few disparities at the levels of overall structure and syntax, measures of lexical diversity and the lexical characteristics of these three texts varied markedly and in a consistent fashion.” Her later work displayed a marked decrease in unique word choices relative to the overall word count.

Building on that, in 2011 linguists performed a more robust analysis of Murdoch’s novels and compared them to those of Agatha Christie, who was suspected of having Alzheimer’s, and PD James, who did not experience any cognitive decline over her 94 years. Their results supported the earlier study, and further they seemed to be able to detect a more “impoverished” vocabulary in Murdoch’s novels a full thirty years before her death. They also felt that they had convincing evidence Christie did, in fact, suffer from Alzheimer’s.



So now, it’s not surprising that some researchers would want to perform a similar examination of Terry Pratchett, considering how many novels he produced, especially in the same world, over many decades. They chose 33 out of the 41 Discworld novels, excluding those that were very short or written for young adults, and looked for patterns in the vocabulary used.

They found a “significant decrease in lexical diversity across all word classes” beginning after the publication of The Last Continent in 1998, the 22nd book in the series–9 and a half years before his diagnosis.

So there we go! Pretty good evidence that it may be possible to diagnose Alzheimer’s early using a careful examination of a history of the patient’s writings. Right? Well, no, it’s not quite that simple.

First, let me point out some criticisms I’ve seen a lot about this study, as articulated by Marc Burrows, who wrote a biography of Terry Pratchett:

“First,” Burrows writes on Facebook, “the point where this supposed “decline” begins is just before the strongest run of his entire career — a decade of book after book that includes Night Watch and Nation, two of the finest novels Sir Terry ever wrote. To argue that his writing was already deteriorating years before those books appeared just doesn’t stand up.”

Okay, that is not what this study or any of the previous studies have shown. Yes, Murdoch’s final novel was panned but these studies do not have anything to say about the quality of the authors’ work. In fact, they are specifically looking for very subtle changes in word choice that literally require an algorithm to identify. Pratchett could very well have been using less diverse language while continuing to knock it out of the park when it comes to character development, storyline, and humor.



Burrows goes on, “Second, there’s a far simpler explanation for a drop in adjective use: he was getting better. At this point Sir Terry was writing at an astonishing rate — often two or three novels a year. His prose was getting cleaner and more disciplined. He was learning, bit by bit, not to let vocabulary get in the way of character, narrative and theme. That's mastery, not decline. Unless the argument is that Alzheimer’s made him a better writer, which feels… off.”

That is absolutely true, and it actually negates his first point: you do not necessarily need a unique array of words in order to produce a great novel. Yes. Correct. And Pratchett very well may have made a conscious effort to change up his style. So why didn’t the researchers consider that? Simple: they did. In the discussion section of their paper, they include a lengthy list of reasons why this is not a slam dunk case of a decline in cognition: “Age-related changes in writing style are expected, and it is possible that some of the observed changes represent natural stylistic evolution rather than disease-related decline.”

They also point out that after his diagnosis, Pratchett’s language may have changed due to related factors like stress, or having less time to write.

Burrow’s third point is “the big one — Sir Terry had posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), a very rare form of Alzheimer’s that affects visual and spatial processing first. It isn’t a language-led illness in its early stages, and it often doesn’t touch memory or vocabulary for a long time. That’s one reason it’s so hard to diagnose. It doesn't work like other forms of dementia.



“When language problems do show up in PCA, they usually come via visual impairment — difficulty reading, scanning text, processing what’s on the page, that sort of thing. Many of you will have seen the heartbreaking footage of Terry trying to read from Nation onstage at the Discworld con and complaining of "shadows" on the page. It can slow access to words, but it doesn’t shrink vocabulary in this neat, statistical way. Terry himself talked about this a lot. He took great pride in being able to rattle off long lists of words when he was being tested, while being unable to copy simple pictures.

Even later on, when writing genuinely became a struggle, Rob Wilkins has been very clear that the issues were about keeping the shape of a story in his head and the character voices distinct— not about choosing words. And yet the articles making these claims don't mention PCA at all, which is extraordinary when you’re citing scientific research and talking about the effects of a disease. They lump all forms of alzheimers together.”

That’s also a great point: why did the authors lump all forms of Alzheimer’s together? Simple: they didn’t. I’ll give Burrows a break here and assume that he was ONLY reading some popular press about the study instead of reading the study itself (which is available in full for free), but if that’s the case it’s really better to actually point to those articles and criticize them and not the study itself. Because the authors do repeatedly point out that Pratchett had PCA: they cite research that found “that in addition to the well reported degradation of vision, literacy and numeracy, PCA is characterised by progressive oral language dysfunction with prominent word retrieval difficulties.”



And then we’re back to that discussion section, where the authors state plainly that “while PCA and Alzheimer’s disease share some common features and PCA is thought to be in most cases caused by Alzheimer’s disease, they are distinct conditions with different clinical presentations. It is possible that the linguistic markers of PCA may differ from those of Alzheimer’s disease. For example, PCA often causes severe reading impairments and “pure alexia,” which disrupts the writer’s ability to visually scan and review their own text. Writers unable to effectively read their drafts may struggle to detect unwanted lexical repetitions and potentially may contribute to the observed decline in lexical richness.”

So I’m not impressed by these quite common criticisms of the study, seeing as one is just wrong and the others are freely stated by the study authors as limitations. The authors also point out that they could only judge the books based upon their publishing date, with no way to know exactly when in his life Pratchett actually wrote the books. They also point out that unlike the 2011 study, they didn’t have a control author with no known problems with cognition.

Essentially, this was just another case study to add to the data.


That said, I will point out some critical thoughts I had about the idea that research like this will allow earlier detection of conditions like Alzheimer’s. While all of the writers discussed were diagnosed with Alzheimer’s or strongly suspected by experts to have had it, these changes in vocabulary do not point to Alzheimer’s specifically: they point to cognitive decline, and that can mean about a zillion different diseases. Alzheimer’s, sure, but also Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s, dementia with Lewy bodies, depression, concussion, or medication side effects. Even if we had a nice little private algorithm running in our email outboxes that can detect declining cognition long before we notice it ourselves, that would be a real “well what the fuck now” situation. There would need to be a serious discussion about whether or not it makes sense to then run every test possible to try to narrow it down immediately, or whether you just have to wait and see what happens, terrified every time you walk into a room and forget what you were going there for.

I’ve talked in the past about the seemingly paradoxical problem of elective full body MRIs and gene sequencing: sometimes more information is actually worse for us, if it stresses us out and puts us through procedures that end up being useless. Sometimes ignorance really is bliss.

So, it’s an interesting study just for the sake of scientific inquiry, but I’m not sure it should give anyone a lot of hope for a way to easily detect early Alzheimer’s in the near future. And also, the takeaway absolutely is NOT “study pinpoints when Discworld fell off.” I haven’t even made it to the fan-favorite “golden age” yet but I’m fairly certain that Terry Pratchett could craft an entertaining story with a toddler’s vocabulary so I’m not worried about it.








+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2603.10 - 10:10

- Days ago: MOM = 3904 days ago & DAD = 558 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I post Hey Mom blog entries on special occasions. I post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day, and now I have a second count for Days since my Dad died on August 28, 2024. I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of Mom's death, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of her death and sometimes 13:40 EDT for the time of Dad's death. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.