Hey, Mom! The Explanation.

Here's the permanent dedicated link to my first Hey, Mom! post and the explanation of the feature it contains.

Also,

Friday, February 6, 2026

A Sense of Doubt blog post #4008 - Pizza Intelligence: Tracking Correlation Between Late Night Pizza Orders and Military Activity



A Sense of Doubt blog post #4008 - Pizza Intelligence: Tracking Correlation Between Late Night Pizza Orders and Military Activity

I re-scheduled multiple blog posts for today, and after planning out most of the next month and now I want to get off the blog and onto other things, I am just sharing this fascinating web site.

Thanks for tuning in!





WHAT IS THIS???



WHAT IS THE PENTAGON PIZZA INDEX?

The Pentagon Pizza Index (PizzINT) is a real-time dashboard that monitors pizza shop popularity around the Pentagon area in Arlington, Virginia. Based on the famous "Pentagon Pizza Theory," this project tracks potential correlations between late-night pizza orders and military activity.

Originally a Cold War-era observation that pizza deliveries to government buildings might indicate crisis activity, the theory gained internet fame during recent geopolitical events. Our dashboard brings this concept into the digital age using publicly available data.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

The Pentagon Pizza Theory dates back to the 1980s and 1990s, when journalists and pizza delivery drivers noticed spikes in late-night orders before major military operations:

  • 1983 Grenada Invasion: Pentagon pizza orders reportedly doubled the night before
  • 1989 Panama Invasion: Similar patterns observed by Domino's drivers
  • 1991 Gulf War: Extensively documented by D.C. pizza franchises
  • 2024 Viral Moment: Social media users tracked Google Maps data during Middle East tensions

Our dashboard digitizes this folk intelligence into a modern OSINT tool.

HOW IT WORKS

Our system monitors pizza shops near the Pentagon using:

Data Sources

  • • Google Maps "Popular Times"
  • • Real-time foot traffic data
  • • Historical pattern analysis
  • • OSINT social media feeds

Analysis

  • • Spike detection algorithms
  • • DOUGHCON-style alert levels
  • • Pattern correlation
  • • Automated monitoring

THE TEAM

PizzINT is maintained by a team of developers, OSINT enthusiasts, and pizza lovers who believe in making intelligence accessible and entertaining.

Our Mission

To democratize open-source intelligence through innovative data visualization, while maintaining the humor and skepticism that makes OSINT both effective and enjoyable.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS

  • • Educational Purpose: This is a novelty/entertainment project based on internet culture
  • • Not Official Intelligence: We are not affiliated with any government or military organization
  • • Correlation ≠ Causation: Pizza spikes do not necessarily indicate military activity
  • • Public Data Only: All information comes from publicly available sources
  • • No Investment Advice: Do not make financial or strategic decisions based on this data

TECHNICAL INFORMATION

Built With:

  • • Next.js 15 & React 19
  • • TypeScript
  • • Tailwind CSS
  • • Supabase Database
  • • Vercel Hosting

Features:

  • • Real-time data updates
  • • Mobile-responsive design
  • • API access available
  • • Historical data tracking
  • • Social sharing tools

GET IN TOUCH

Questions, suggestions, or just want to chat about pizza intelligence? We'd love to hear from you!

Email: ads.pizzint@gmail.com
Website: pizzint.watch

We typically respond within 24-48 hours. Please note that we're a small team working on this project in our spare time.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

-  Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2602.06 - 10:10

- Days ago: MOM = 3871 days ago & DAD = 526 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I post Hey Mom blog entries on special occasions. I post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day, and now I have a second count for Days since my Dad died on August 28, 2024. I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of Mom's death, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of her death and sometimes 13:40 EDT for the time of Dad's death. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

Thursday, February 5, 2026

A Sense of Doubt blog post #4007 - Letter to Dad #21 - Acts of Service

April 2012


A Sense of Doubt blog post #4007 - Letter to Dad #21 - Acts of Service


Hi Dad, Today our topic is ACTS OF SERVICE, one of the "Love Languages," see here:

https://go.westminster.org/understanding-the-love-languages/



Acts of Service

Acts of service as a love language is primarily about going out of your way to serve, help, or take care of someone’s needs and responsibilities. An act of service can include doing the dishes, taking out the trash, or evening filling up someone else’s gas tank. 

If you or your partner’s love language is acts of service, use these ideas to show your partner you love them.

  • Make your spouse a cup of coffee first thing in the morning
  • Cook them a meal
  • Take care of a chore that is normally their responsibility (dishes, laundry, trash, etc.)
  • Remove the mental load from someone else by planning something they normally would (vacation, date night, etc.)


I never really thought about acts of service as a love language until I got married and discovered that my spouse appreciates acts of service and shows love in the same way in return.

I also discovered that I had received a great deal of training in acts of service during the 15 years I helped you take care of Mom, like in that photo above, when three years before she died, we were still practicing walking with assistance!

In that photo, you are 76 years old (you had not yet turned 77) and Mom was 75. I just like those ages as a point of reference for what we're seeing.

I think about our care for Mom and mainly yours, as you did so much more of it than I, as I do things around the house every day.

For example, I remember how you always prepared for bed time, setting out the pills to be taken with a cup of water, lining up the other things that needed doing after cleaning up the kitchen after dinner.

I do the same thing because that ritual became part of my training, and several of the the things I set out are for the dogs.

I also have learned how much I like doing acts of service and how it makes me feel to take care of someone else, to do nice things for that person.

I wish I could go back in time and show that level of care and service in previous relationships as they would have lasted longer than they did. I spent many years being much more selfish than I should have been. Granted, we're all selfish to some extent. But I was over focused on myself and my own needs for too many years and did not sacrifice enough or at all for others. In my last serious relationship before I got married, I at least realized that I could not make the sacrifices needed and that's really why I ended it, ultimately, after she ended it originally (but it lingered).

I am not saying that I would rather be with someone from my past. Not at all. But those women deserved better treatment from me and some deserved seriously A LOT better than what I provided.

These regrets make me a better person now, I believe. So I like reviewing them.

If not for you, Dad, (and MOM) I might not have learned acts of service and internalized why they are so important in a relationship.

Beyond that, not much news, at least news I feel like sharing publicly.

After weeks of GI upset, we are trying a new diet with Ellory, which so far she loves.

I am watching Star Fleet Academy and loving it.

I am going to the Zen cohort and a Star Trek fan club on Saturday.

I love you Dad.

More next week.



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

-  Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2601.05 - 10:10

- Days ago: MOM = 3870 days ago & DAD = 525 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I post Hey Mom blog entries on special occasions. I post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day, and now I have a second count for Days since my Dad died on August 28, 2024. I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of Mom's death, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of her death and sometimes 13:40 EDT for the time of Dad's death. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

Wednesday, February 4, 2026

A Sense of Doubt blog post #4006 - Plot Twists - Writing Wednesday for 2602.04



A Sense of Doubt blog post #4006 - Plot Twists - Writing Wednesday for 2602.04

Welcome back to Writing Wednesday.

In looking for content to share in these weekly writing posts, when I don't have new advice of my own, or don't want to just share the umpteenth time that progress is progress even if you write just two lines today, I came across Brianna Sarovski.

Bri is still working on her debut book, but while she does so, she is making writing advice content on multiple social media platforms, and despite her lack of publishing credentials, she has done her home work and has good advice to share.

I collected her recent series on plot twists. I borrowed the image above from the book

Mastering Plot Twists  by Jane K. Cleland.

But I am in a book buying freeze, so I did not buy it.

Yet.

Here's two of Bri's socials, and you can access her others from either page.

https://www.instagram.com/authorbrisarovski/

https://www.youtube.com/@authorbrisarovski

One benefit of gathering writing advice from others on a topic that I have given considerable thought is how validating the advice is.

I have always loved books on writing for this reason. I feel validated in choices I have made or strategies I have employed, and I also always get new ideas that send my thinking off in an unexpected direction.

These "lessons" on plot twists all use as examples books I have read (and maybe need to re-read) as well as good advice that's clear and direct.

If Bri's fiction is going to be as good as her writing tips based on what she knows and has learned, her books are going to be great!

Obviously, I am not sharing about the plot twists I am working on in my novel projects for the same reason that Bri is not using her own fiction as examples for hers.

If you write, lots to absorb and think about here.

Thanks for tuning in.



7-step plot twist


Struggling to write a good plot twist? Here's how to actually implement one in your story.

Plot twists require at least two drafts: one to write the story and figure out the twist yourself, another to go back and properly seed the clues. Sometimes you'll realize your twist doesn't work and needs adjusting. Sometimes you over-explained and need to trust readers more.

That's all part of the process.

Here's the framework I follow: start with what your character truly wants and fears. Let the twist grow organically from those answers, not from your desire to shock readers. Map out both versions of your story — what readers think versus what's actually happening underneath.

Then reverse-engineer. What clues need to exist for the twist to feel inevitable? Make a list. Plant each clue, but remember they need to serve the story in the moment, not just point to the twist.

Layer your foreshadowing across multiple dimensions. Create ambiguous evidence that could support multiple conclusions. Test the emotional weight: will this revelation change how readers understand a character they care about?

And plan the aftermath. The twist isn't the ending, it's the catalyst for the true climax. Give it space to breathe and develop.

Don't be afraid to cut a twist if it's not serving your story. Your story's integrity matters more than any single plot point, no matter how clever you think it is.

Check out the full deep-dive on my YouTube channel (in bio) where I break down examples from Mistborn, The Fifth Season, and more!

What's your biggest struggle with writing plot twists?

#writersofinstagram #novelwriting #fictionwriting



Betrayal Plot Twist


Never have a character do something out of character purely because you need them to for your plot twist to work.

The betrayal trope is everywhere, but most writers execute it… kinda terribly. They spend 20 chapters showing unwavering loyalty, then announce "surprise, they were evil all time" with zero cracks in the façade.

That's not a twist; that's violating character logic.

If your friend was secretly a traitor, readers need to see the gray area — the place between what seemed to be happening and what was actually happening. Small inconsistencies, moments of hesitation, and/or actions that made sense at the time but look suspicious in hindsight.

Patrick Rothfuss does this really well in The Kingkiller Chronicle. Characters have hidden depths, but when their motivations are revealed, you can trace them through the entire narrative because he's thought through the logic of each perspective.

After your twist is revealed, does your story make MORE sense or LESS sense? Does it add complexity or just confusion?

Make your betrayals hurt because readers believed in the relationship AND can see the pattern looking back. That's when character logic creates devastating, satisfying twists.

Check out my YouTube video for the full framework on writing plot twists that don't feel cheap (in bio).

What's one betrayal twist that actually worked for you?

#characterdevelopment #writingcommunity #amwriting




The Secret to Plot Twists that Actually Work

Your plot twist can shock readers AND make perfect sense. How, you ask? Well, keep reading.

Most writers think surprise and logic are opposites. They're not. Logic doesn't mean predictability, it means following the rules YOU established for your world, characters, and plot.

Great plot twists uphold every type of storytelling logic while still catching readers off guard through misdirection, not dishonesty.

Misdirection isn't lying. Lying is saying "the character walked into the EMPTY room" when someone's hiding there. Misdirection is saying "the character walked into the room" and just letting your readers assume it's empty.

Think N.K. Jemisin's The Fifth Season. She never lies, she structures the narrative so you make assumptions about timeline and POV connections. When the reveal hits, every piece of information was technically accurate. You just interpreted it differently.

Test your twist with the reread test: would earlier scenes take on new meaning? Do odd character behaviors suddenly make sense? Can readers spot your clues? If yes, your twist is logically sound.

Your twist should emerge from character psychology, not your desire to shock. Let it grow organically from what characters want and fear.

Full breakdown in my latest YouTube video (in bio).

What's one plot twist that floored you because it was surprising AND inevitable?

#writingtips #plottwist #storycraft




Your Plot Twist Should Come From Character, Not Convenience

The best plot twists don't exist to shock readers, they exist because that's where the character's journey was always leading. If your twist only works by having characters act out of character, you don't have a twist, you have a plot hole.

Character logic is non-negotiable. People can surprise us, but they can't contradict their established psychology without explanation. If your sweet, gentle protagonist suddenly murders someone in cold blood, readers will revolt — unless you've shown the gradual psychological journey that led them there. Breaking points need buildup.

Take the "secret traitor" trope. Weak version: the loyal best friend who's had zero suspicious moments suddenly reveals they were the villain all along with no explanation beyond "I fooled you." That violates everything you've shown us about their character. Strong version: the loyal friend who had small inconsistencies throughout — information they shouldn't have had, plans that coincidentally led where the villain wanted, moments where their mask slipped but seemed like something else in context.

When the betrayal is revealed, we can trace the pattern. They weren't lying about their feelings. They really did care (which is why it was hard for them), but they also had conflicting motivations we didn't fully understand. That respects character logic, plot logic, AND emotional logic.

In Mistborn, when certain reveals happen, they're not just clever, they're emotionally devastating because they reframe everything we thought we understood about the struggle and add tragic depth to characters we thought were simply evil. The intellectual surprise pairs with emotional gut-punch, and that's what makes it memorable.

Your twist should emerge from who your characters are and what they want. Never have someone do something purely because YOU need them to for the twist to work. Let character drive plot, not the other way around.

Start with motivation, not with the desire to shock.

#characterdevelopment #writersofinstagram #novelwriting



The Art of Misdirection in Plot Twists

Misdirection is not the same as lying to readers; it's the difference between a genius plot twist and a frustrating one. The best twists give readers all the information they need but structure it in ways that encourage natural misinterpretation.

Real clues should: Point toward your twist while serving multiple narrative purposes, appear at least three times in different contexts (the rule of three), and feel natural to the scene rather than obviously planted. In The Fifth Season, N.K. Jemisin presents accurate information about timelines and POV relationships, but she also lets readers assume something different than what's actually happening. She never lies. She just doesn't correct assumptions.

Red herrings should: Follow your story's established logic (they're truths, just misinterpreted ones), have their own internal consistency, and point to conclusions that make sense within your world. A red herring isn't a lie, it's information that seems to mean one thing but actually means another. The protective older brother who seems suspicious? Maybe he's not the traitor. Maybe he's just legitimately protective and readers assumed the worst.

The balance: Control information flow carefully. Show readers things the protagonist doesn't see. Give readers information the protagonist doesn't have. Create dramatic irony where readers feel smart piecing things together before or alongside your protagonist. But never make your characters look stupid for missing obvious solutions.

Think of Patrick Rothfuss in The Kingkiller Chronicle — small inconsistencies in Kvothe's narration, details about magic that seem like flavour text, character interactions that feel natural but take on new significance later. The setup is subtle enough that readers don't consciously catch it, but it registers subconsciously.

Give your readers a fair mystery to solve, even if they don't realize they're solving it.

#writingadvice #fictionwriting #storytelling




The Architecture of a Good Plot Twist


The architecture of plot twists that don't feel cheap comes down to two things: setup and payoff. But most writers get the balance wrong.

They either plant clues so obviously that the twist becomes predictable, or they plant nothing at all and pull the reveal out of thin air, leaving readers feeling betrayed instead of satisfied. The sweet spot is hiding your twist in plain sight the entire time.

Your setup needs three qualities: Multiple types of clues (dialogue, behavior, environment, structure), clues that serve the story in the moment (not just pointing to the twist), and the "rule of three" (mention your clue three times in different contexts so it lodges in readers' subconscious).

Your payoff needs perfect timing: Typically around the 75-80% mark so you have space to explore the consequences. The twist isn't the end but rather the catalyst for the true climax. Show character reactions, change relationships, raise stakes, and prove the twist wasn't just a gimmick but a fundamental shift in story reality.

Brandon Sanderson does this masterfully in Mistborn. When you hit that reveal, it's genuinely shocking, but then you realize he planted clues on almost every page. Patrick Rothfuss layers mysteries throughout The Name of the Wind with such subtlety that most readers don't consciously notice the details on first read, but they register subconsciously, creating that "I should have seen this coming" feeling.

The test: after your twist, can readers reread and find it makes MORE sense? Does it add complexity, or just confusion?

Plant your breadcrumbs early. Make your reveals inevitable in hindsight, not convenient in the moment.

#writingtips #amwriting #writingcommunity

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2602.04 - 10:10

- Days ago: MOM = 3869 days ago & DAD = 524 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I post Hey Mom blog entries on special occasions. I post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day, and now I have a second count for Days since my Dad died on August 28, 2024. I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of Mom's death, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of her death and sometimes 13:40 EDT for the time of Dad's death. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

Tuesday, February 3, 2026

A Sense of Doubt blog post #4005 - Another Government Maneuver to Silence Its Critics

https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/government-pressure-to-suspend-jimmy-kimmel-was-an-abuse-of-power


A Sense of Doubt blog post #4005 - Another Government Maneuver to Silence Its Critics

Seems to me that the presumption of good intent from the Federal government is gone.

Though trust has eroded, seriously, since Nixon, the current administration may be the worst ever in so many areas, especially in the ability of at least half the country to presume its good intent.

Because Donald Trump cannot stand criticism and shows himself to be -- often multiple times a day -- the thinnest skinned person to EVER hold the office of president (as far as we know at least), or at least in modern times, he is obsessed with those who criticize him the most and publicly, like talk show hosts, like Jimmy Kimmel.

So in collusion with the FCC, there's a new effort to silence people like Kimmel.

As well as another effort to silence, Don Lemon.

https://ew.com/don-lemon-arrest-details-11898188

Thanks for tuning in!


Jimmy Kimmel on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live' on Sept. 23, 2025; Brendan Carr in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 6, 2025
Jimmy Kimmel on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live' on Sept. 23, 2025; Brendan Carr in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 6, 2025.Credit: 

Disney/Randy Holmes; Paul Morigi/Getty 

Jimmy Kimmel slams FCC after chair demands changes to talk shows: 'Doing everything he can to shut us up'

"It's his latest attack on free speech," the comedian said of the FCC's chair, Brendan Carr, introducing new restrictions on late-night programs.


  • Jimmy Kimmel condemned the FCC's new policies that place more restrictions on late-night shows.
  • Kimmel said that the organization's chair, Brendan Carr, is "doing everything he can to shut us up."
  • The comedian shared his analysis of the new policy, arguing that "it's his latest attack on free speech."


https://ew.com/jimmy-kimmel-slams-fcc-after-chair-demands-changes-to-talk-shows-11891791




Jimmy Kimmel is fighting with the FCC once again.

The comedian used his Jimmy Kimmel Live monologue on Thursday night to draw attention to the organization's chair, Brendan Carr, after he demanded that talk shows like Live and The View give an equal amount of time to political candidates on both sides of the aisle.

"[Carr] is doing everything he can to shut us up, the easy way or the hard way," Kimmel said in the monologue.

The FCC released new guidance on Wednesday that argued that talk shows and late-night shows should not be considered "bona fide" news programs, and thus should not continue to receive exemption from the equal time rule. That night, President Trump posted a link to a Los Angeles Times article with the caption, "FCC takes aim at The ViewJimmy Kimmel Live in fight over ‘equal time’ rules for politicians."

The new guidance effectively states that shows like Jimmy Kimmel Live and The Late Show With Stephen Colbert must now give equal time to all political candidates running for the same office.

"They're reinterpreting long-agreed-upon rules to stifle us," Kimmel said. "And this one's a little bit complicated. It's not as easy as what happened the last time.  So I want to break it down."

Trump Has a Nasty New Bruise, Launches Board of Peace & Jimmy Kimmel Breaks Down the FCC’s Threats


Kimmel explained that the equal time rule emerged out of necessity in the radio era. "There were huge radio networks, and if a candidate running for office made an appearance on one of those networks, it was a big deal. It could give the candidate a major advantage over his opponents, which gave the broadcasters a lot of power."

The comedian went on to explain that Congress passed the Radio Act of 1927 to address these issues. "If you put one candidate on the air, you had to offer the same amount of air time to all the other candidates," he said. "You know, it's not just Republican and Democrats. Sometimes there are 20 people from 20 different parties running for the same spot. And if you can't interview all of them, then you can't interview any of them."

Congress then added exemptions for bona fide news programs in 1959, and allowed the FCC to dictate which shows fell under the definition of bona fide. "That allowed ABC, CBS, NBC, et cetera to interview one candidate without having to interview all of them, which mostly applied to news programs until years later when talk shows started having candidates on," Kimmel said, noting that John F. Kennedy appeared on The Tonight Show and Bill Clinton guested on The Arsenio Hall Show.  

The FCC later ruled on talk shows in 2006 when Arnold Schwarzenegger's opponent for the California governorship, Democrat Phil Angelides, filed a complaint when the Terminator star appeared on The Tonight Show.

Jimmy Kimmel on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live' on Feb. 26, 2025
Jimmy Kimmel on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live' on Feb. 26, 2025.

Disney/Randy Holmes

"The FCC denied his request," Kimmel said. "They ruled that Arnold appearing on Leno was a bona fide news interview, even though it was a talk show, and therefore not subject to those equal time rules. And that's how every talk show has operated since then."

Kimmel said that this norm seems to be ending with the FCC's latest guidance. "[Carr] is trying to say we no longer qualify for the bona fide news exemption when it comes to interviewing candidates, which is a sneaky little way of keeping viewpoints that aren't his off the air," he argued. "It's his latest attack on free speech."

The comedian then opined that the FCC's talk show shakeup doesn't make sense in a modern media landscape. 

"It's a joke because this isn't the '50s anymore. Back then there were only three major networks," he said. "Now we've got cable, we got streaming, we have satellite, podcast, social media. There are thousands of outlets now."

Kimmel noted that conservative broadcasters aren't subject to any FCC scrutiny because they don't use the same airwaves. "There are so many channels, some of them doing 24/7 Trump programming. Fox News, Newsmax, One America News, Real America's Voice," he said. "None of them are required to give equal time, but we are because we use the public airways. Equal time was designed to limit how much influence broadcasters have over public opinion. But we're not the only thing on television anymore."

Brendan Carr testifies during the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government hearing on May 21, 2025.
Brendan Carr testifies during the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government hearing on May 21, 2025.

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty

The comedian also said that he doesn't know how the new FCC guidelines will affect late-night shows moving forward. "I have no idea what the outcome of this is going to be," he said. "We'll find out. I guess whatever happens, I want to just point it out because it is another example of this administration trying to squash anyone who doesn't support them by following 'the rules.'"

Get your daily dose of entertainment news, celebrity updates, and what to watch with our EW Dispatch newsletter.

Kimmel previously came into conflict with the FCC in September. After Carr encouraged ABC affiliate groups to preempt the talk show during an appearance on The Benny Show, groups like Nexstar and Sinclair announced that they would do just that, which led to ABC suspending the show nationwide for six days. 

After the show was reinstated by ABC's parent company, Disney, some affiliate groups still refused to air Jimmy Kimmel Live — a decision that Carr praised on social media

"This is the first time recently that any local TV stations have pushed back on a national programmer like Disney," Carr wrote on X. "And that is a good thing because we want empowered local TV stations. After all, local TV stations — not the national programmers — have public interest obligations, and they should be making decisions that in their view meets the needs of their local communities."


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2602.03 - 10:10

- Days ago: MOM = 3868 days ago & DAD = 523 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I post Hey Mom blog entries on special occasions. I post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day, and now I have a second count for Days since my Dad died on August 28, 2024. I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of Mom's death, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of her death and sometimes 13:40 EDT for the time of Dad's death. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

Monday, February 2, 2026

A Sense of Doubt blog post #4004 - Bowie Cover Songs from Albums


A Sense of Doubt blog post #4004 - Bowie Cover Songs from Albums

David Bowie month is over, but I still have three posts that are delayed and scheduled, starting with this one.

I have collected all the covers Bowie did on his studio albums in a single mix. Not including the entire PinUps album.

Though I am a huge Bowie fan, I am a little embarrassed to share that I did not know that some of these were covers for many years.

I am not sure when I discovered that "Wild is The Wind" and "Kingdom Come" were not written by Bowie, but it was after many, many years of believing that they were.

I may have figured it out when Heathen came out on which he covered the song "Cactus" by the Pixies, which was the first one I knew since "Let's Spend the Night Together" and "Across the Universe."

Also, for awhile, I thought it was a thing for Bowie to have one cover on each album, but that's also NOT the case.

Some albums feature NO covers, such as Diamond Dogs, Lodger, etc.

And some have more than one, like Heathen and Tonight.

That's all.

Kind of a quick Music Monday today as I was catching up.

Thanks for tuning in.


My David Bowie Covers Mix




David Bowie covered numerous songs on his studio albums, most notably on the 1973 covers album Pin Ups, featuring glam-rock takes on The Who, The Kinks, and The Pretty Things; other key covers include "Across the Universe" (Young Americans), "Wild is the Wind" (Station to Station), "Kingdom Come" (Scary Monsters), "I Feel Free" (Black Tie, White Noise), "Cactus" (Heathen), and "Try Some, Buy Some" (Reality). 
From Pin Ups (1973): 
  • "Rosalyn" (The Pretty Things)
  • "Don't Bring Me Down" (The Pretty Things)
  • "Here Comes the Night" (Them)
  • "See Emily Play" (Pink Floyd)
  • "Everything's Alright" (The Mojos)
  • "Shapes of Things" (The Yardbirds)
  • "I Wish You Would" (Billy Boy Arnold)
  • "Friday on My Mind" (The Easybeats)
  • "Sorrow" (The Merseys)
  • "I Can't Explain" (The Who)
  • "Anyway, Anyhow, Anywhere" (The Who)
  • "Where Have All the Good Times Gone" (The Kinks) 
Other Studio Albums: 
  • The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust... (1972): "It Ain't Easy" (Ron Davies)
  • Aladdin Sane (1973): "Let's Spend the Night Together" (Jagger/Richards)
  • Young Americans (1975): "Across the Universe" (Lennon/McCartney)
  • Station to Station (1976): "Wild is the Wind" (Washington/Tiomkin)
  • Scary Monsters... (1980): "Kingdom Come" (Tom Verlaine)
  • Black Tie, White Noise (1993): "I Feel Free" (Brown/Bruce), "Nite Flights" (Noel Scott Engel)
  • Tin Machine (1989): "Working Class Hero" (John Lennon)
  • Never Let Me Down (1987): "Bang Bang" (Osterberg/Williamson)
  • Tonight (1984): "I Keep Forgetting" (Lieber/Stoller/Garfield), "God Only Knows" (Wilson/Asher), "Don't Look Down" (Osterberg/Williamson)
  • Heathen (2002): "Cactus" (Francis Black), "I've Been Waiting For You" (Neil Young), "I Took a Trip on a Gemini Spaceship" (Norman Odam)
  • Reality (2003): "Picasso" (Jonathan Richman), "Try Some, Buy Some" (George Harrison) 









+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - date - time

- Days ago: MOM = ## days ago & DAD = ## days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I post Hey Mom blog entries on special occasions. I post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day, and now I have a second count for Days since my Dad died on August 28, 2024. I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of Mom's death, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of her death and sometimes 13:40 EDT for the time of Dad's death. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.