Hey, Mom! The Explanation.

Here's the permanent dedicated link to my first Hey, Mom! post and the explanation of the feature it contains.

Thursday, August 5, 2021

A Sense of Doubt blog post #2361 - Racial Slurs Are not Tributes or Fitting Team Names

Chief Wahoo no more!!
A Sense of Doubt blog post #2361 - Racial Slurs Are not Tributes or Fitting Team Names

Do you remember when people cared about other people?

Can we get back to that way of life instead of this incessant hate?

The thing about the term "woke" is that it means the state of existence after "waking up." Thus, all these conservative wing nuts who are trying to make "woke" a dirty word are NOT AWAKE.

Isn't being awake better than being not awake? "Not awake" is not necessarily asleep, it just means stunted, not activated, stagnant, closed off, shut down, powered off, and generally lacking in actualization.

I am happy to say that I am "woke." I would rather be "woke" than "not woke."

I am also happy to care about other people, which is a thing we all need to practice.

Outrage is the new opioid for the masses. Outrage will not get us anywhere as a human species.

I have decided to eliminate the term "political correctness" from my vocabulary. It's the same campaign of hate against caring about others through use of language that is currently being touted against being "woke."

When I avoid racial slurs, use the pronoun someone has asked me to use for them, or avoided hate speech that has reached acceptable levels by some, I am not being "politically correct"; I am simply exercising sensitive and loving life practice in being kind to others, in being gracious to others, in responding positively and not negatively to the universe, in showing EMPATHY and COMPASSION to others, especially those who suffer attacks, hate, and violence for being who they are, experiences I do not have because I am privileged to be in the hegemonic class, sex/gender, and race.

It is not politically correct to avoid using "ghetto" as synonym for "cheap, rundown, shoddy, gross, etc." I am not being "woke" to use the term "sleeveless t-shirt" rather than "wife-beater." Really? We're going to call a piece of clothing something that disgusting??? The code for that merchandise at some mall stores is "WB" for wife-beater. I am not being "correct" or "political" to refrain from using the word "gay" as a synonym for "stupid." For all these things and more, I am simply being kind, showing empathy, being a good person, following the teachings of Christ (and many other religious messiahs and icons), and I do not even consider myself a Christian.

And yet so many CINOs (Christians In Name Only) do all these things and more.

It's why many love Donald Trump because he "speaks his mind."

What little of it there is...

And so the soon to no longer be CLEVELAND INDIANS.

True, the Cleveland Baseball team was named for a Native American on the roster when the team was named from the "Cleveland Spiders" (and I wish they had gone back to THAT name) to the "Indians" because of the way  Louis Sockalexis was knocking the cover off the ball at the time.

Yes, true.

But if 10,000 native people whose ancestors were decimated in an intentional campaign of genocide against them and are still murdered in alarming ways today with little interest from the "white" criminal justice system, if these people say "hey, that's a hateful name, you should change it." Then, uh, let's change it, regardless of the tribute origins.

If I officially renamed the Republican Party the GOAP -- Grande Olde Assholes Party -- and made ASSHOLE logos for their hats and referred to them all the time as ASSHOLES and banged asshole war drums and wore asshole headdresses at their Asshole games that MAYBE these ASSHOLES would say "hey, that's kind of hateful to us, maybe you should stop that."

I do call them ASSHOLES a lot. It's wrong of me, even if they are BEING ASSHOLES. Just like my play on RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) with CINOs earlier in this post.

Yeah, I am not immune. I have trouble managing my outrage.

But come on, man... doesn't this just MAKE SENSE.

The Washing Redskins -- an even more hateful and racistly-charged name -- dropped the Redskins, banned "headdress" costumes at their games, and are the WFT -- Washington Football Team -- until they think of a new and better name.

And so the ATALNTA BRAVES and their racist "tomahawk chop" are the only Native American slur team left in professional sports at the major league level. I do not presume to know all the minor and G-league team names, so...

Besides, INDIANS has always been a misnomer. COLUMBUS did not find INDIA and so the native peoples here were not and are not INDIANS for FUCK'S SAKE.

Here's some WONKETTE attention to this topic by my favorite Wonkette scribe, Ms. Robin Pennacchia.

Word!


For some conservatives, using racial slurs or whining about how it's not fair that Black people can use the n-word and they can't is simply not enough. They need, for whatever reason, to also have sports teams with racial slurs for names, and they need it desperately.

So desperately, in fact, that two prominent conservative sites actually tried to make the case that it would be more woke for the newly-minted Cleveland Guardians to stay the Cleveland Indians.

On Breitbart, Alana Mastrangelo tried to make the case that changing the name was an insult to Cleveland Spider's Louis Sockalexis, the first Native American in major league baseball, to whom the name was supposedly, possibly a tribute.

She wrote:

Soon after being signed by the Cleveland Spiders in early 1897, Sockalexis wowed local sportswriters, who began referring to the team as the "Indians," and by the end of March that year, the name "Spiders" was virtually forgotten. [...]

In January 1915, team owner Charles Somers decided to revive the local nickname — which had previously defined the city's National League club — and officially named the team the Cleveland Indians, says SABR.

While some historians claim Somers chose a Native American-esque name, in part, to mimic the Atlanta Braves — due to being inspired by the team winning the World Series a year earlier — the name "Cleveland Indians" is nonetheless the stark revival of the team's old byname.

But 106 years later, in the wake of political correctness, cancel culture, and the woke mob running rampant, the Cleveland Indians — a name presumably derived from Somers reminiscing about the period of excitement that Sockalexis brought to Cleveland in 1897 — is no more.

Oh how sad for Louis Sockalexis that he can no longer be honored by a grotesque caricature of his people, who, just for the record, were not from India. They were not "Indians." They were Penobscot. The only reason they were called "Indians" is because a genocidal Italian dude refused to admit he got lost.

Speaking of which. The first Italian-American baseball player was Ed Abbaticchio, who played for the Philadelphia Phillies. Would Mastroangelo prefer that they changed their name to the Philadelphia Dagos to honor him? Or the Philadelphia Mafiosi? Or the Philadelphia Handsome But Comically Stupid Stock Characters? That would be super weird, right? Like, even if one were not particularly offended by it, it would at least feel unnecessary. And not remotely like an "honor."

When honoring people, it's important to take into consideration what they might want. And I don't think anyone would want to be honored like this:

Over at the National Review, Nicholas Frankovich tried to argue that if the Cleveland Indians are changing their name, why is it still okay for teams to named after Northern European ethnic groups, huh?

He explains:

The reasons most often cited for objecting to "Indians" never added up, as you noticed if you calculated with a close eye and an open mind. Let's run through the main two reasons, quickly.

To name a sports team after an ethnicity is to demean the ethnicity. Unless, apparently, we're talking about northwestern Europeans — Vikings, Celtics, Yankees, Fighting Irish.

If you say that it isn't racist to name a team after certain European ethnicities, I don't disagree. If you then maintain that it is racist to name a team after a people whom European settler-colonizers displaced, please explain.[...]

Over the years, to no avail, I've asked friends and foes to make explicit the logic that leads them to aver that "Indians" is a racist team name but that "Yankees," for example, is not. They've left me to do the work for them.

Frankovich has a guess. It's not a very good guess.

Since our premise is that it's demeaning to a people to attach their name to a sports team, to do so when the people in question are not at the bottom of a presumed status hierarchy has a leveling effect: The distance between them and those deemed to have suffered greater historical humiliation is reduced. The principle of equality is thereby served.

Nope, that would not be it.

The New York Yankees were actually Yankees. It would be a bit different, I suppose, if it were the Georgia Yankees and the teams merchandise relied on culturally ridiculous depictions of Yankees as vicious carpetbaggers, but that is not the case. The Boston Celtics? So named because there were a lot of Irish people in Boston and actually did honor those people. Because it wasn't a slur. It's not like they named them the Boston Micks. Their mascot is a sassy leprechaun, not a drunk priest. This is not hard.

Even in the case of the Fighting Irish? The name was chosen by Irish people. At a Catholic university.

Indigenous people were not involved in the choosing of these team names. They did not have that power. The team names were chosen not to celebrate them but to invoke shitty stereotypes of Native Americans as violent "savages."

None of this is hard, none of it is complicated. These people don't literally think that the name or the caricature "honors" a Native American baseball player and they don't actually think that naming your team The Indians or, you know, the other one, is the same thing as people in a largely Irish city naming their team The Celtics. No one thinks that.

They're just scared and they want to go back to a time when they could just say whatever they wanted always and didn't have to worry about offending anyone, which would make a lot more sense if that had ever actually happened in the course of human history.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2108.05 - 10:10

- Days ago = 2225 days ago

- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I plan to continue Hey Mom posts at least twice per week but will continue to post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

No comments: