Hey, Mom! Talking to My Mother #648 - Brain has more than 100 times higher computational capacity than previously thought, say UCLA scientists
Hi Mom,
So, here's a thing. Banner week on the blog. Musical Monday, persuasive writing, a call the fire the White House Press Secretary, a nice Throwback photo, and then anti-semitism in comics. How could I follow that?
How about the question of when computers will exceed the capacity of the human brain?
I did a quick search, and I am not sure if I have written about this issue yet on my blog.
I teach a book called Radical Evolution at Western Michigan University. It's a shorter version of Ray Kurzweil's The Singularity is Near, which described four emerging technologies (GRIN - genetic engineering, robotics, information tech (AI), and nanotechnology, and how any one or a combination of these technologies could radically transform our lives, our world, and even our humanity, IE. what is means to be human and the definition of a human being.
This future prediction about these technologies has come to be known as the singularity, a term coined by originally by thinker and mathematician John von Neumann for technological progress of accelerating change. I have been misinforming my students that a gravitational singularity or a mathematical singularity, from where I assumed the name had been taken, is the same as a gravity well, like a planet or sun. Not so. Oops.
Gravitationally, a singularity is a "point" in space-time in which a gravitational field of a celestial body becomes infinite. Likewise, a singularity in mathematics is a point for which a mathematical object is not defined, as in it fails to be differentiable (discontinuity), one of which is an infinite discontinuity.
I guess this fits better the idea of the "singularity" as expressed in these books and "The Coming Technological Singularity" by Vernor Vinge because the progress could very well be infinite, which brings us to today's subject.
But, BTW, I made a video about these technologies. There's stuff specific to a class I no longer teach, but the description of the technologies is mostly correct, except for the gravity well part as I am just discovering right now. Hey, I can admit when I am wrong.
Here's the video:
So, today's blog post is about how close our technology (computers) is to meeting and/or exceeding the power, measured in computations (calculations) per second of the human brain.
Radical Evolution was written in 2005, at a time when a new IBM super computer, Blue Gene, would be able to do one quadrillon computations per second, much closer in order of magnitude to the human brain's then, supposed, ten quadrillon computations.
Today's article reveals that maybe the brain is even more powerful than that ten quadrillon mark. The article claims that the scientists studying the issue have discovered that the brain has about 100 times the capacity previously believed. Now, we're talking 1,000 quadrillon, or a quintillon (10^18).
The core of this discussion about computer capacity in the ability of the CPU to eventually match and then out pace the human brain is Moore's Law.
Moore's Law, created by Gordon Moore in the 1960s, claimed that computing power (computations per second) will double every two years (later reduced to 18 months) indefinitely.
This law describes an exponential curve without an upward bound, as in the power will keep doubling with no end in sight.
Here's some cool GIFs and graphics to express this idea and then the article about how scientists have just discovered that the brain is 100 times more powerful than previously believed.
I share all of this if for no other reason than I will direct my students here eventually.
BRAIN MEDIUM GIF
from - http://www.kurzweilai.net/brain-has-more-than-100-times-higher-computational-capacity-than-previously-thought-say-ucla-scientists
Brain has more than 100 times higher computational capacity than previously thought, say UCLA scientists
Dendrites found to generate nearly 10 times more electrochemical spikes than neuron cell bodies
March 10, 2017
The brain has more than 100 times higher computational capacity than was previously thought, a UCLA team has discovered.
Obsoleting neuroscience textbooks, this finding suggests that our brains are both analog and digital computers and could lead to new approaches for treating neurological disorders and developing brain-like computers, according to the researchers.
Dendrites have been considered simple passive conduits of signals. But by working with animals that were moving around freely, the UCLA team showed that dendrites are in fact electrically active — generating nearly 10 times more spikes than the soma (neuron cell body).
Fundamentally changes our understanding of brain computation
The finding, reported in the March 9 issue of the journal Science, challenges the long-held belief that spikes in the soma are the primary way in which perception, learning and memory formation occur.
“Dendrites make up more than 90 percent of neural tissue,” said UCLA neurophysicist Mayank Mehta, the study’s senior author. “Knowing they are much more active than the soma fundamentally changes the nature of our understanding of how the brain computes information.”
“This is a major departure from what neuroscientists have believed for about 60 years,” said Mehta, a UCLA professor of physics and astronomy, of neurology and of neurobiology.
Because the dendrites are nearly 100 times larger in volume than the neuronal centers, Mehta said, the large number of dendritic spikes taking place could mean that the brain has more than 100 times the computational capacity than was previously thought.
Study with moving rats made discovery possible
Previous studies have been limited to stationary rats, because scientists have found that placing electrodes in the dendrites themselves while the animals were moving actually killed those cells. But the UCLA team developed a new technique that involves placing the electrodes near, rather than in, the dendrites.
Using that approach, the scientists measured dendrites’ activity for up to four days in rats that were allowed to move freely within a large maze. Taking measurements from the posterior parietal cortex, the part of the brain that plays a key role in movement planning, the researchers found far more activity in the dendrites than in the somas — approximately five times as many spikes while the rats were sleeping, and up to 10 times as many when they were exploring.
Looking at the soma to understand how the brain works has provided a framework for numerous medical and scientific questions — from diagnosing and treating diseases to how to build computers. But, Mehta said, that framework was based on the understanding that the cell body makes the decisions, and that the process is digital.
“What we found indicates that such decisions are made in the dendrites far more often than in the cell body, and that such computations are not just digital, but also analog,” Mehta said. “Due to technological difficulties, research in brain function has largely focused on the cell body. But we have discovered the secret lives of neurons, especially in the extensive neuronal branches. Our results substantially change our understanding of how neurons compute.”
Abstract of Dynamics of cortical dendritic membrane potential and spikes in freely behaving rats
Neural activity in vivo is primarily measured using extracellular somatic spikes, which provide limited information about neural computation. Hence, it is necessary to record from neuronal dendrites, which generate dendritic action potentials (DAP) and profoundly influence neural computation and plasticity. We measured neocortical sub- and suprathreshold dendritic membrane potential (DMP) from putative distal-most dendrites using tetrodes in freely behaving rats over multiple days with a high degree of stability and sub-millisecond temporal resolution. DAP firing rates were several fold larger than somatic rates. DAP rates were modulated by subthreshold DMP fluctuations which were far larger than DAP amplitude, indicting hybrid, analog-digital coding in the dendrites. Parietal DAP and DMP exhibited egocentric spatial maps comparable to pyramidal neurons. These results have important implications for neural coding and plasticity.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Reflect and connect.
Have someone give you a kiss, and tell you that I love you.
I miss you so very much, Mom.
Talk to you tomorrow, Mom.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- Days ago = 650 days ago
- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 1704.15 - 10:10
NOTE on time: When I post late, I had been posting at 7:10 a.m. because Google is on Pacific Time, and so this is really 10:10 EDT. However, it still shows up on the blog in Pacific time. So, I am going to start posting at 10:10 a.m. Pacific time, intending this to be 10:10 Eastern time. I know this only matters to me, and to you, Mom. But I am not going back and changing all the 7:10 a.m. times. But I will run this note for a while. Mom, you know that I am posting at 10:10 a.m. often because this is the time of your death.
No comments:
Post a Comment