Hey, Mom! The Explanation.

Here's the permanent dedicated link to my first Hey, Mom! post and the explanation of the feature it contains.

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Hey, Mom! Talking to My Mother #805 - Racism as American as Baseball

Fenway Park - 1709.13

Hey, Mom! Talking to My Mother #805 - Racism as American as Baseball

Hi Mom,

Still in catch up mode, so not much original content today, but first, awesome to these fans for getting this HUGE banner in the ball park and then unfurling it. They made the news. SUCCESS.

I quite agree.

As much as I love BASEBALL, I quite agree with the sentiment both for the racism seen in Baseball this year as well as the racism that's resurfaced in the country. After all, it's the STATE OF THE HATE NATION.

And to prove the Hate Nation is alive and well, here's another story to follow the ESPN share of an officer acquitted in the murder of a young black man from a few years back. I was alerted to the story when a school for which I teach that's located in Missouri sent us all a message offering counseling services for affected students and affirming the commitment to diversity and to progressive thinking.

Amen.

But first before you dive into the ESPN article, I extracted this quote, which I rather like.

"We want to remind everyone that just as baseball is fundamental to American culture and history, so too is racism," said a statement from the ejected group that was later emailed to CSN. "White people need to wake up to this reality before white supremacy can truly be dismantled. We urge anyone who is interested in learning more or taking action to contact their local racial justice organization."
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/20697346/fans-removed-fenway-park-seats-racism-american-baseball-sign

Fans removed from Fenway Park after lowering 'Racism is as American as baseball' sign


BOSTON -- Four fans seated above the Green Monster at Fenway Park dropped down a sign that read "Racism is as American as baseball" during the fourth inning of the Red Sox's game against the Oakland Athletics on Wednesday night.
The sign was draped over the top middle section of the Green Monster and had a black background with white letters.
It was up for about one batter. There were a smattering of boos from the crowd as Red Sox security forced those holding the sign to remove it and escorted the people from their seats. Umpire Joe West and police were seen on the field discussing what happened.
"During the fourth inning of tonight's game, four fans unfurled a banner over the left-field wall in violation of the club's policy prohibiting signs of any kind to be hung or affixed to the ballpark," a Red Sox spokesperson said. "The individuals involved were escorted out of Fenway Park."
One of those ejected, who confirmed their identity to CSN New England with a photo of the banner from a unique vantage as it was being unfurled, said the protest was inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement.
The Boston Globe reported no arrests were made in connection with the incident. Red Sox president and CEO Sam Kennedy told the newspaper: "Clearly they wanted to make a statement."
The Red Sox lost the game 7-3. Afterward, what happened in that fourth inning was a topic in the home clubhouse.
"There's no place for that," outfielder Mookie Betts said. "That's for another day, though."
Added manager John Farrell: "Saw it was draped over the Monster. From the dugout, you see someone expressing their opinion and it looked like it was withdrawn relatively quick.''
The ejected individual who spoke to CSN New England in a phone interview was surprised there was confusion as to the exact message being sent, as some thought the banner was promoting racism.
"I guess we should have seen that coming, but we also didn't think of it as an ambiguous message," the group member told CSN New England. "It's kind of telling that it is being interpreted as one."
The group member denied any affiliation with Antifa or Antifa Boston, which earlier took credit for the incident via Twitter.
"We want to remind everyone that just as baseball is fundamental to American culture and history, so too is racism," said a statement from the ejected group that was later emailed to CSN. "White people need to wake up to this reality before white supremacy can truly be dismantled. We urge anyone who is interested in learning more or taking action to contact their local racial justice organization."
It's not the first time racism and Fenway Park have been linked this season.
In May, Baltimore Orioles center fielder Adam Jones said he was subjected to a torrent of N-words and other racist taunts at Fenway during the team's game against the Red Sox. The Red Sox later apologized to Jones, and the team toughened its fan code of conduct to stress a zero-tolerance policy and impose the harshest possible penalties for violators.
A night later, the Red Sox permanently banned a man from Fenway whom they said used a racial slur toward another fan.
"The banner came in response to the racist comments at the beginning of the season at Fenway [that Jones spoke of]," the ejected individual todl CSN New England. "But overall, we saw, we see Boston continually priding itself as a kind of liberal, not racist city, and are reminded also constantly that it's actually an extremely segregated city. It has been for a long time, and that no white people can avoid the history of racism, essentially.
"So we did this banner as a gesture towards that, to have a conversation about that."
In August, Red Sox owner John Henry told the Boston Herald that the organization will lead the way in attempts to change the name Yawkey Way. The street adjacent to Fenway is named after Tom Yawkey, who owned the team from 1933 to 1976 and refused to integrate it until 1959.
Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/09/16/ex-officer-acquitted-in-st-louis-slaying-i-did-nothing-wrong/?utm_term=.b95b3dd3f4d0




Ex-officer acquitted 

in St. Louis slaying:

 'I did nothing wrong'

 



Jason Stockley, the former St. Louis police officer who was acquitted of murder Friday in the 2011 fatal shooting of a black man, broke his months-long silence and doubled down on his innocence after the ruling.
"I did not murder Anthony Lamar Smith. I did not plant a gun," Stockley said, shaking his head, in an exclusive interview with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch after his acquittal. "… I can feel for and I understand what the family is going through, and I know everyone wants someone to blame, but I'm just not the guy."
The interview, which appeared to be videotaped in a private indoor space, came hours after a judge released a 30-page order concluding as much: that the state had not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Stockley "did not act in self-defense" when he shot and killed Smith, 24, during a car chase in December 2011.
It was the first time Stockley, who had been under a gag order, publicly addressed the case, which has exacerbated tensions in a region already grappling with unrest surrounding police use of force and race.
"It feels like a burden has been lifted, but the burden of having to kill someone never really lifts," Stockley told the Post-Dispatch. "The taking of a life is the most significant thing that one can do, and it's not something that is done lightly and it's not something that should ever be celebrated. And it's just a horrible experience altogether. But, sometimes, it's necessary."

As in trial, Stockley insisted that he did not recall saying during the car chase that he was "going to kill this motherf—er, don't you know it," as outlined in court documents. Prosecutors also noted that a gun found in Smith's car was later found to contain only Stockley's DNA and accused the officer of planting the firearm.
Stockley said that his memory was imperfect and that the first time he heard himself saying what he did in the car was when he met with the FBI; he could only speculate as to why he had said it, "whether it was in the heat of the moment or whether it was part of a larger conversation," he said.
"I can tell you with absolute certainty that there was no plan to murder Anthony Smith during a high-speed vehicle pursuit," Stockley told the newspaper. "It's just not the case."
Stockley acknowledged in his interview that the "optics" of the case looked bad but said he had made the best decisions possible "based on limited information and a limited amount of time."
"Every resisting looks bad. They never look good," Stockley told the Post-Dispatch. "So what you have to separate are the optics from the facts, and if a person is unwilling to do that, then they've already made up their mind and the facts just don't matter. To those people, there's nothing that I can do to change their minds."
Stockley declined an interview request Saturday through his attorney, Neil J. Bruntrager, who told The Washington Post that his client's conversation with the Post-Dispatch was likely a "one and done" situation. The trial, he said, had left Stockley emotionally exhausted.
"All you're doing is reading these articles and statements from people who are ill-informed and demonizing you, and you have no ability to respond," Bruntrager said. "Think what that must be like. … I don't know how the top of his head didn't blow off."
As general counsel for the St. Louis Police Officers Association, Bruntrager also represented Darren Wilson, the police officer who shot and killed Michael Brown, an unarmed teenager, in Ferguson, Mo., a St. Louis suburb. He emphasized, however, that Stockley's case preceded the Brown shooting by several years and needed to be considered individually.
"It's important to look at the video, but that's not all of the evidence … I would encourage people to read Judge [Timothy] Wilson's opinion because here's a detailed examination of the facts of the case, and it leaves no stone unturned," Bruntrager said. "This wasn't a routine traffic stop. This was a drug-related stop. Those by their very nature — they're deadly."
The judge's ruling Friday prompted protests in St. Louis, which began peacefully but, after nightfall, turned violent, according to a joint video statement by St. Louis Police Chief Lawrence O'Toole and Mayor Lyda Krewson. The clashes resulted in at least 23 arrests and 10 injured police officers, O'Toole said. Even before the acquittal, the city was bracing for protests, as The Post reported:
On Friday night, Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens (R), who had put the state's National Guard on standby ahead of the verdict and potential protests, chastised those who engaged in violence, saying it "is not going to be tolerated here in the state of Missouri."
Before the verdict was announced, Greitens stood with Christina Wilson, Smith's fiancee, to deliver a joint message asking people to protest peacefully.
"If you feel like you want to speak out, speak how you feel," Wilson said at the news briefing. "And whatever comes to you, just do it in a peaceful way."
Greitens, speaking after Wilson, urged people who felt pain after the verdict not to "turn that pain into violence."
"One life has been lost in this case, and we don't need more bloodshed," he said.
In his interview with the Post-Dispatch, Stockley said he was concerned the ensuing protests would escalate to violence.
"My main concern now is for the first responders, the people just trying to go to work and the protesters," Stockley told the newspaper. "I don't want anyone to be hurt in any way over this."
According to his LinkedIn profile, Stockley left the St. Louis police force in 2013 and moved to Houston, where he worked as a regional project manager at TH Hill Associates, an oil and gas drilling consulting firm. He graduated from the U.S. Military Academy in 2002 with degrees in philosophy and nuclear engineering; afterward, Stockley served in the Army in Iraq, where he received a bronze star, and was honorably discharged after an injury, Bruntrager said.
Stockley told the Post-Dispatch on Friday that he had been apart from his family and had no plan besides "not to let this dictate my life." When asked what he might have done differently on that day in December 2011, he responded: "Take the day off."
"I don't know how changing any number of my actions that day would have changed the outcome," he told the newspaper. There was one main reason he had agreed to speak about the case.

"Because I didn't do anything wrong," he said. "If you're telling the truth, and you've been wrongfully accused, you should be shouting it from a mountaintop."

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Reflect and connect.

Have someone give you a kiss, and tell you that I love you.

I miss you so very much, Mom.

Talk to you tomorrow, Mom.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Days ago = ## days ago

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - date - time

NEW (written 1708.27) NOTE on time: I am now in the same time zone as Google! So, when I post at 10:10 a.m. PDT to coincide with the time of your death, Mom, I am now actually posting late, so it's really 1:10 p.m. EDT. But I will continue to use the time stamp of 10:10 a.m. to remember the time of your death, Mom. I know this only matters to me, and to you, Mom.

No comments: