Hey, Mom! The Explanation.

Here's the permanent dedicated link to my first Hey, Mom! post and the explanation of the feature it contains.

Saturday, April 17, 2021

A Sense of Doubt blog post #2251 - Racism is a Public Health Crisis - Weekly Hodge Podge 2104.17



A Sense of Doubt blog post #2251 - Racism is a Public Health Crisis - Weekly Hodge Podge 2104.17

Quick HODGE PODGE a day late with little to no curating.

More horrible news from the south, this time ARKANSAS being abominable to human beings.

Lots of hypocrites in our nation who claim to adhere to certain teachings, such as a particular religious dogma, and violate the principles of the teaching ALL THE TIME.

But first, Juneteenth here in PORTLAND and the source of my theme for the week.

ENJOY.

Juneteenth is now an Oregon holiday and Multnomah County declared racism “a public health crisis.” Juneteenth falls on June 19 and commemorates the day when enslaved people were told they were free in Galveston, Texas. Portland and Multnomah County have already adopted the holiday as a paid leave day. 

  • Related: The Multnomah County Board of Commissioners voted to formally recognize racism as a public health crisis last week and “now that county leaders have declared racial inequity a threat to public health, they will be obligated to look for ways to counteract racism in future,” according to a report from Willamette Week

Arkansas Lege Wants Anyone Involved With Your Healthcare To Be Free To Discriminate Against You

This week, the Arkansas House passed two bills seemingly designed to make it incredibly unpleasant for kids who are not Bible-banging bigots to attend school. Why? Well, because they're assholes. There's not really a better or deeper answer than that.

On Wednesday, the House passed a bill allowing teachers to teach creationism. Yes, we're actually doing this again. Apparently now that Trump is gone, conservatives feel much more free to go back to their more theocratic tendencies. Despite the claims of many "prophets" that Trump was practically the Second Coming, the actual practice of supporting a crass, twice-divorced casino owner who was obviously only feigning to be super into Jesus seemed to make many Christians chill on the whole "the earth is 6,000 years old!" thing. Quite frankly, I think they didn't want to run the risk of anyone actually asking him about it.

Via KATV:

Rep. Mary Bentley sponsored HB 1704 which would allow for teachers to use the creation theory in science along with the evolution theory.

"I've had teachers in my district ask me if we could please make it available for them to be able to discuss some scientists that truly believe that the theory of creation should be taught in school," Bentley said, adding that it could be taught along with the theory of evolution, not in place of it.

Bentley said this bill would allow teachers the option to use creation theory but it does not force them.

Now, this is obviously illegal. The Supreme Court determined in 1987's Edwards v. Aguillard that teaching creationism in science classes is unconstitutional because creationism is a Christian religious belief and a public school cannot teach a Christian religious belief as science, no matter how desperately some Christians may want to believe that their belief is scientific.

Bentley, however, appears to be betting on the fact that a very conservative Supreme Court may change that.

It is understandable — or at least it has been made clear — that many Christians don't just think of their beliefs as things that they believe because it is part of their religion, but because they are factually true. So it probably does really hurt their feelings to be told "That's not science and you can't teach it as science." But the fact is, it is their religion. Teachers who wish to teach creationism are free, in their off-hours, to teach Sunday School or to stand outside on a sidewalk, handing out Jack Chick flyers and evangelizing to their heart's content — but they are not free to try to convert their students, because that is illegal. It is also not what they are being paid, by taxpayers, to do.

Not everyone gets to do what they love for a living. I do, but I'm lucky. If these people want to teach creationism for a living, then they will have to find another job and someone who is willing to pay them to do that. It's not that hard! Or it shouldn't be. Unless what they really want is an opportunity to preach to non-Christian children in a captive setting. Then they might have a problem.

As if that weren't bad enough, the House also passed a House Bill 1749, which would allow teachers to misgender trans students and call them by their dead name. Supposedly because teachers are scared that they won't be able to keep track of preferred pronouns and new names.

Guess who the chief sponsor of that bill is? Mary Bentley! Who apparently just spends all day every day talking to teachers about these matters.

Via Arkansas Online:

Bentley said schools should do more to address things like students changing their name between classes or identifying as an animal.

"We have a real issue in our state, and I need our districts to take a look at this and do more than this bill does," Bentley said. "This bill is just a first step to help protect our teachers but when we have students in school now that don't identify as a boy or a girl but as a cat, as a furry, we have issues."

Some members of the House Education Committee said Tuesday that those concerns weren't something they'd heard from teachers.

In response to a question from committee member Rep. Charlene Fite, R-Van Buren, Bentley said no teacher had been sued for not using a student's preferred name or pronoun in Arkansas as of Tuesday.

Looks like Oh! You let gay people get married, someone's gonna wanna marry their dog! is now Oh! You let trans people exist! Someone's going to want to be a cat!

Of course, it's obvious why people like Bentley pull that nonsense. Her point is not that it will be too confusing for teachers, but that being trans is absurd as "identifying as a cat." She's also trying to make it out like teachers are being bombarded by legions of trans students changing their names and pronouns every day, because she wants it to look like this is simply a trend rather than who these kids actually are.

Bentley said some teachers had raised concerns to her about students who have changed their name or pronoun several times in a year, or use three different names in as many classrooms, and fear that they'll be sued for not addressing the child by their preferred name or pronoun.

"It's not compelling anyone's speech. It's not prohibiting anyone's speech. It's helping those professors and teachers in our schools that do not want to be sued for not using a certain person's pronoun," Bentley said.

Every year at the beginning of class, even when I was a kid, teachers asked students if they had a nickname they preferred. They kept track of all the Jens, Jennys and Jennifers just fine. Heck, my teachers even learned how to pronounce my last name (most of them, anyway). This is no more difficult than that. No one is looking to sue teachers over making a sincere mistake. The issue is teachers who just really want to misgender trans students and call them by their old names because they don't think those kids should exist. Because they want those kids to feel badly about who they are. They want those kids to be uncomfortable so that they, the adults, can feel more comfortable. They are putting their own comfort ahead of their students' comfort.

People who want children to feel bad should not be teachers, end of discussion.

Of course, it is entirely possible that all of these science teachers who desperately want to teach creationism and all these teachers who are very jazzed about humiliating their students exist primarily in the mind of Mary Bentley. Perhaps Mary Bentley should quit her job in the House and start a private school for students who wish to be poorly informed jerks.

Anyway! This is now your open thread! Have a lovely day!

Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.



SHINY NEW GOOD STUFF


The White House is announcing the expulsion of 10 Russian diplomats and announcing a new round of sanctions against Russia. From a report:The moves are in response to interference in last year's presidential election as well as the hacking last year of federal government agencies. The U.S. for the first time explicitly linked that intrusion to a Russian intelligence service. [...] The sanctions, foreshadowed for weeks by the administration, represents the first retaliatory action announced against the Kremlin for last year's hack, familiarly known as the SolarWinds breach. In that intrusion, Russian hackers are believed to have infected widely used software with malicious code, enabling them to access the networks of at least nine agencies in what U.S. officials believe was an intelligence gathering operation aimed at mining government secrets.



Elizabeth Warren Slams Student Loan Servicer as Democrats Call for Debt Cancellation

Chairing her first student debt hearing, Warren told a panelist he should be fired.






Senate Democrats made the case Tuesday for canceling some student debt, noting that debt forgiveness would stimulate the pandemic-battered economy, help close the racial wealth gap, and aid families who have put off homeownership, child-rearing, or retirement.

But Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the chair of the Senate subcommittee that held the hearing on student debt—Warren’s first as the panel’s head—focused her questioning less on cancellation and more on the corporations who process the loans she’d like to cancel.

Her main target was Navient, one of the nation’s largest servicers of both federal and private student loan debt, processing the loans of more than 12 million borrowers nationwide. The company’s CEO, John Remondi, was on a panel of nearly a dozen speakers, from members of Congress to academics, who gathered virtually to discuss a wide-ranging set of issues related to student debt, including the proposal championed by Warren for President Joe Biden to forgive up to $50,000 of student loan debt via executive action. 

Warren opened her questioning by highlighting the numerous state investigations and lawsuits directed at Navient, as well as the revelation that Navient overcharged the federal government for $22.3 million in student loan subsidies that the company has recently been directed to pay back.



“Mr. Remondi, if a person who worked at the Department of Education stole $22.3 million, they’d be fired,” she said. “Can you explain why your government contracts haven’t been canceled and why Navient has continued to reward you personally with nearly $40 million in compensation since 2014, even as these scandals pile up?” She called for the federal government to end its contracts with Navient—and said Navient should fire its CEO, while he listened. (Remondi said that some of the allegations raised by Warren aren’t true and repeated that his company’s goal is to help all borrowers.)

Later, Warren confronted James Steeley, the CEO of the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA), one of the largest servicers for the federal government’s embattled public service loan forgiveness program. She cited several lawsuits and Education Department audits that have accused the company of undercounting borrowers’ payments in assessing their eligibility for public service loan forgiveness—resulting in 98 percent of applicants to the program being denied forgiveness. Steeley claimed that these findings were incorrect but did not elaborate on how. 

Both Navient and PHEAA have faced a number of lawsuits regarding their treatment of student borrowers. Warren noted that six states have filed suit against Navient, as has the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which alleges that Navient deceived borrowers, nudging them towards higher repayment amounts than they otherwise were eligible for. PHEAA recently settled a lawsuit filed by the attorney general of Massachusetts, agreeing to pay relief to borrowers in the state. 

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) also catalogued the lawsuits against Navient, asking Remondi how much he was paid across the three years in which the lawsuits were filed. Remondi’s total compensation during that time amounted to more than $20 million—a number that paled in comparison to the billions that Navient is accused of overcharging borrowers, according to Menendez.

“If I was one of your shareholders, I’d be concerned that you pocketed $20 million in salary and compensation but yet your company might be responsible for a couple of billion dollars to American families,” Menendez said. “If I was one of your customers, I’d be calling [Education] Secretary [Miguel] Cardona to cancel my student debt immediately.”

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) questioned PHEAA’s Steeley about the process that his company is using to review borrowers’ eligible payments for public service loan forgiveness. Steeley criticized the complexity of the requirements placed on the program by Congress. But Van Hollen responded that the 98 percent denial rate for forgiveness “is not due to complexity alone,” adding that borrowers haven’t gotten the guidance that they should have received from servicers like PHEAA who are administering the loans. PHEAA, he said, “has taken an admittedly complicated process and made it worse.”


France is offering residents $2,975 to trade in their gas-powered vehicle for an electric bicycle. The Next Web reports:Earlier this week, lawmakers in France approved the measure in a preliminary vote. The French Federation of Bicycle Users claims that if France does go ahead with the scheme, it would be the first nation in the world to give people money for old cars to put towards new electric bicycles, Reuters reports. However, the organization must be leaving out crucial details as to how it reached that conclusion as there have been other similar schemes.

For example, as Martti Tulenheimo, chief specialist at the Finnish Cyclists' Federation points out, Finland has a similar rebate which citizens have used to fund more than 2,000 ebikes, 1,000 new low emission cars, and 100 public transport tickets. Lithuania also offered such a scheme last year. The nation's Environmental Project Management Agency (APVA) offered residents $1,200 if they traded in their old cars. The money could then be used against anything from escooters, to ebikes, to public transport tickets. The scheme was considered a success with more than 8,500 people applying for the grant.





THE BAD STUFF



An anonymous reader quotes a report from Variety:China's internet regulator has launched a hotline for citizens to report online comments that defame the ruling Communist Party and its approved description of history ahead of the Party's upcoming 100th anniversary. The new hotline will enable internet users to stop the spread of "mistaken opinions" and create a "good public opinion atmosphere" to pave the way for the July 1 occasion, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) said in a notice. People can also send in tip-offs via the CAC's website and app.

"For a while now, some people with ulterior motiveshave spread historically nihilistic false statements online, maliciously distorting, slandering and denying Party, national and military history in an attempt to confuse people's thinking," the notice said. "We hope that most internet users will play an active role in supervising societyand enthusiastically report harmful information." "Historically nihilistic" information, in official rhetoric, is content that incites doubt about the Party's account of the past.

It will accept four types of content complaints: distortions of history, attacks on the Party's "leadership, guiding ideology, principles or policies," the defamation of heroes and martyrs, and "denials of the excellence of traditional Chinese culture, revolutionary culture and advanced socialist culture." The CAC notice did not explain what punishments would be in store for violators. China already frequently detains and jails people for online speech deemed politically inappropriate.



Although Mike Lindell is supposed to be launching his super amazing social media site that is going to be even bigger than all of the other social media sites on April 19th, he still has time to visit his friend Steve Bannon about once a week to complain about how no one else will let him go on their shows to talk about how Donald Trump actually won the election and Joe Biden stole it from him with the help of Dominion voting machines (pronounced, in Lindell-ese, dough-MIN-ion).

As has been widely reported, Dominion voting systems is currently suing Fox News for over a billion dollars for having had people on there claiming that they rigged the election for Joe Biden. Thus, they probably think it is a bad idea to have Mike Lindell on to talk about how Dominion rigged the election for Joe Biden. They also canceled Lou Dobbs' show, likely for the same reason.

And I will tell you, as grotesque as these election lies are, I actually have some reticence about these kinds of lawsuits because they can also be leveraged against legitimate news sources by bad corporations, which then creates an atmosphere where news sources without the deep pockets to fight these battles in court may not pursue important stories for fear of being sued, and that's not great for journalism. But regardless of how anyone feels about this lawsuit, it is happening, and that is obviously why Fox isn't having Mike Lindell on every other day. Because they don't want to be sued more than they are already being sued.

But that is not an answer Mike Lindell is willing to accept. He's convinced it goes much deeper, somehow, and told Steve Bannon in an interview Friday on Bannon's "War Room: Pandemic" show that he has even gone so far as to hire "private investigators" to find out why Fox won't have him on.

In a discussion about how the Murdochs are "tough hombres" but not as purely committed to the conservative cause as Roger Ailes was, Bannon asked Lindell about why he wasn't on Fox so much these days.

Why are the Murdochs — and correct me if I'm wrong, I think you're one of the biggest advertisers on there — I don't remember seeing you on Fox recently. Why are the Murdochs afraid of Dominion? Is there something about their case? Is there something about the facts? I mean the Murdochs are tough, they don't care. So why is Mike Lindell not on Fox and why do they seem to say, hey, when Dominion says something, we're just gonna shut up about it and talk about Biden's tax bill?

So weird to talk about actual news instead of the libelous pipe dreams of a pillow salesman.

Again, it seems relatively obvious why the Murdochs are "afraid" of Dominion. They are already being sued, they don't want to be sued for more money, and they don't think it's worth it to be sued for more money just to give Mike Lindell a platform for his bullshit. Because they're capitalists and their goal is to make more money for themselves, not lose it because the Pillow Guy wants to go on the air and tell lies that he thinks will somehow lead to Donald Trump being president again.

Lindell, however, is still waiting for those answers.

You know, I'm gonna have those answers soon, 'cause I've hired private investigators and I've spent a lot of money on them to investigate everything. Why are there bots and trolls, who's behind them? Why is Facebook involved, Wikipedia involved? And then the big question: why isn't Fox having people on? Why isn't Fox on there talking about Dominion and Smartmatic and the election fraud?

Bannon then asked an actual good question — "What if their response is 'Hey Mike, we saw the films, we've seen it, and we just don't think you've got the evidence?' [...] Could that be a response?"

"100 percent no," Lindell said, and then complained about how none of the mainstream media will have him on, even though he is willing to go on all of the mainstream media, even CNN, and none of them are interested. It's almost as if no one believes him, which would just be crazy. So it can't be that. Clearly, he's gotta get some private eyes involved to find out what is really going on.

It's not a bad idea. I may hire some investigators myself to find out why I do not have my own TV show and line of glamour capes. Also to find out why Jeff Goldblum is not my boyfriend. It would all be an obvious waste of money because it would be super weird of me to feel entitled to any of those things and also Jeff Goldblum is already married, but hey! Why not? If we're all hiring investigators to find out why we don't get to do all of the things we want when there are already extremely obvious reasons for why we don't have them, might as well.

In other news, Mike Lindell's website is supposed to launch on April 19th — and although Bannon and Lindell said we can all go ahead and sign up now, ahead of time, to beat the rush, that does not appear to be the case.

Disappointing!

[Steve Bannon War Room]

Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.


https://news.slashdot.org/story/21/04/14/2211250/a-23-year-old-coder-kept-qanon-online-when-no-one-else-would

A 23-Year-Old Coder Kept QAnon Online When No One Else Would (bloomberg.com)

409

Bloomberg's William Turton and Joshua Brustein have published a profile of the 23-year-old proprietor of VanwaTech, an internet provider in Vancouver, Wash. that "provides tech support to the U.S. networks of White nationalists and conspiracy theorists banned by the likes of Amazon." An anonymous Slashdot reader shares an excerpt from the report:Two and a half months before extremists invaded the U.S. Capitol, the far-right wing of the internet suffered a brief collapse. All at once, in the final weeks of the country's presidential campaign, a handful of prominent sites catering to White supremacists and adherents of the QAnon conspiracy movement stopped functioning. To many of the forums' most devoted participants, the outage seemed to prove the American political struggle was approaching its apocalyptic endgame. "Dems are making a concerted move across all platforms," read one characteristic tweet. "The burning of the land foreshadows a massive imperial strike back in the next few days."

In fact, there'd been no conspiracy to take down the sites; they'd crashed because of a technical glitch with VanwaTech, a tiny company in Vancouver, Wash., that they rely on for various kinds of network infrastructure. They went back online with a simple server reset about an hour later, after the proprietor, 23-year-old Nick Lim, woke up from a nap at his mom's condo. Lim founded VanwaTech in late 2019. He hosts some websites directly and provides others with technical services including protection against certain cyberattacks; his annual revenue, he says, is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Although small, the operation serves clients including the Daily Stormer, one of America's most notorious online destinations for overt neo-Nazis, and 8kun, the message board at the center of the QAnon movement, whose adherents were heavily involved in the violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Lim exists in a singularly odd corner of the business world. He says he's not an extremist, just an entrepreneur with a maximalist view of free speech. "There needs to be a me, right?" he says, while eating pho at a Vietnamese restaurant near his headquarters. "Once you get to the point where you look at whether content is safe or unsafe, as soon as you do that, you've opened a can of worms." At best, his apolitical framing comes across as naive; at worst, as preposterous gaslighting. In interviews with Bloomberg Businessweek early in 2020, Lim said he didn't really know what QAnon was and had no opinion about Donald Trump. What's undeniable is the niche Lim is filling. His blip of a company is providing essential tech support for the kinds of violence-prone hate groups and conspiracists that tend to get banned by mainstream providers such as Amazon Web Services.





Source: France, CODE PENAL / commentaires imagés de Joseph Hémard (Paris : Editions Littéraires de France, 192u?), Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.

The ongoing criminal trial against Derek Chauvin is a rarity; police officers are almost never even disciplined for their wrongdoings, much less criminally charged.

Prosecutors and cops don't like to investigate and charge other prosecutors and cops. Because of this, civil litigation often ends up being the only chance for victims of police brutality and their loved ones to have their day in court.

Unfortunately, qualified immunity stops most civil rights lawsuits in their tracks.

But that will no longer be the case in New Mexico, which this week became the second state to ban qualified immunity! This is a HUGE deal, especially considering that, in New Mexico, "officers have killed more people by population than in any other state three of the past four years." The Albuquerque Police Department, in particular, is known for its violence, killing 11 people in 2018 and 2019.

For decades, the doctrine of qualified immunity has stood as a barrier to justice in yet untold numbers civil rights cases. Qualified immunity was created by judges to protect government actors who have done bad things — and has been very good at doing just that.

In the wake of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor's murders, a special session of the New Mexico legislature was called last summer to address issues of police brutality. The New Mexico Civil Rights Act (also called House Bill 4), signed Wednesday by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, is the end result of some of that work.
We've told you about qualified immunity before ... and, spoiler alert, it's still bullshit. Qualified immunity is a fascist doctrine created by courts to make it harder for people to sue when their rights have been violated.
Before a civil rights case can proceed at all, courts are required to determine if qualified immunity applies. To decide whether qualified immunity applies to a given case, the judge has to answer two questions: Was a constitutional right violated? Was that right "clearly established" at the time of the events in question?

The second question is what dooms most cases before they begin. Unless a case with the exact same facts has already said "YES THIS IS A CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION," the vast majority of cases are quickly dismissed.

In a decision granting qualified immunity last August, Judge Carlton Reeves recounted some decisions where courts granted qualified immunity:

Our courts have shielded a police officer who shot a child while the officer was attempting to shoot the family dog; prison guards who forced a prisoner to sleep in cells "covered in feces" for days; police officers who stole over $225,000 worth of property; a deputy who body-slammed a woman after she simply "ignored [the deputy's] command and walked away"; an officer who seriously burned a woman after detonating a "flashbang" device in the bedroom where she was sleeping; an officer who deployed a dog against a suspect who "claim[ed] that he surrendered by raising his hands in the air"; and an officer who shot an unarmed woman eight times after she threw a knife and glass at a police dog that was attacking her brother.
Yikes.
In the last few years, with the increased focus on police brutality, qualified immunity has started to get a lot more attention. Last year, with SB 217, Colorado became the first state to officially get rid of qualified immunity for cops. Connecticut and New York City have also strictly limited the defense of qualified immunity in civil rights cases. And with HB 4 signed into law, New Mexico has joined them, with one of the most progressive qualified immunity laws in the country.

The New Mexico law is a little different from the bans on qualified immunity in other places. It applies to all government officials accused of violating someone's rights, where the Colorado and NYC laws are limited to police officers. Damages will be awarded against the relevant local government authority, not the individual actors (which is how these things go in 99.99 percent of cases anyway) and are limited to $2 million (which is actually a lot higher than the other caps on damages under New Mexico law).

Qualified immunity is one of those issues that can end up creating strange bedfellows — and that's a good thing, because it can help get major reform like this passed. In New Mexico, a coalition including the ACLU, Koch-founded Americans for Prosperity, Planned Parenthood, the Innocence Project, the Institute for Justice, the National Police Accountability Project, Ben & Jerry from the ice cream, and the libertarian Cato Institute.

Many congrats to everyone who helped make this law a reality. Like ACLU of New Mexico Executive Director Peter Simonson said,

"Before today, New Mexicans had no means of accessing the lofty freedoms contained in our state Bill of Rights. Put simply, our rights were guarantees on paper, but not in fact. The passage of HB 4 ends that sad irony, literally breathing life into our cherished liberties. It's a truly monumental victory for fairness, justice, and equality."
Hopefully, Colorado, NYC, and New Mexico are only the beginning. Last month, the House of Representatives passed the Justice in Policing Act, which would end qualified immunity for cops, for the second time — and although passing it in the Senate is still an uphill battle, it's not out of the realm of possibility. Around two-thirds of Americans support ending qualified immunity, it's endorsed by the Biden administration, and some Republican Senators have indicated they might be open to it.

Let's do this thing. Our people deserve justice.

HB 4 ]

For more rants, astute observations, and cat pictures, follow Jamie on Twitter!

Do your Amazon shopping through this link, because reasons.

The Washington Post
The Post Most
 
 

The story behind the viral clip of a GOP senator asking whether Kristen Clarke believed Black people are ‘genetically superior’

Analysis   By Aaron Blake   Read more »

A cybersecurity expert who promoted claims of fraud in the 2020 election is leading the GOP-backed recount of millions of ballots in Arizona

By Rosalind S. Helderman   Read more »

 

Chicago releases video of officer fatally shooting 13-year-old Adam Toledo

By Mark Guarino, Meryl Kornfield and Kim Bellware   Read more »


THERE'S STILL A WHOLE LOTTA

 PANDEMIC GOING ON

PANDEMIC

THE WEEKLY PANDEMIC REPORT

Photo of flu patients during the First World War



If you prefer your data in a visual format, here's the current map from COVID Exit Strategy, using data from the CDC and the COVID Tracking Project.

I want to add this link to the weekly report. It's important to remember:

A Sense of Doubt blog post #1983 - Is Coronavirus more contagious and more deadly than the flu? YES.



ALSO... I am seeing a big discrepancy between the Johns Hopkins data in death totals and WORLDOMETER data, which aggregates data from many more sources. Could this be the slow down due to the change in how the CDC obtains the data, having it filter first through Health and Human Services department.

WEEKLY PANDEMIC REPORT - JOHNS HOPKINS

Anyway, as usual, here's the weekly links to the data about cases (lower than reality) and deaths (lower than reality, also) due to COVID-19.




Data can be found here, as always: 

This is also a good data site:

Last updated: April 18, 2021, 01:43 GMT

 United States

Coronavirus Cases:

32,372,119

Deaths:

580,756

Recovered:

24,905,332

Projections

About Worldometer
Worldometer manually analyzes, validates, and aggregates data from thousands of sources in real time and provides global COVID-19 live statistics for a wide audience of caring people around the world.
Over the past 15 years, our statistics have been requested by, and provided to Oxford University PressWileyPearsonCERNWorld Wide Web Consortium (W3C)The AtlanticBBC, Milton J. Rubenstein Museum of Science & Technology, Science Museum of Virginia, Morgan StanleyIBMHewlett PackardDellKasperskyPricewaterhouseCoopersAmazon AlexaGoogle Translate, the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), the U2 concert, and many others.
Worldometer is cited as a source in over 10,000 published books and in more than 6,000 professional journal articles and was voted as one of the best free reference websites by the American Library Association (ALA), the oldest and largest library association in the world.
THE CORONAVIRUS IS MUTATING NOW WHAT?

Coronavirus Is No 1918 Pandemic - The Atlantic

A Red Cross worker in the United States, 1918

No image available





It's been a while since our last “fuck you, Rand Paul" post, but it's not as if the Kentucky GOP senator has become a better person. We've just been busy with other things. The transphobic skid mark has continued his vendetta against Dr. Anthony Fauci, whom he considers a "petty tyrant." Why? Because Dr. Fauci won't shut up about COVID-19, and is acting like it's his goddamn job.

MSNBC's Mehdi Hasan asked Dr. Fauci on Sunday (video below) if it was okay for vaccinated people to eat and drink indoors. Dr. Fauci politely explained why we shouldn't start licking light sockets just yet.

FAUCI: No, it's still not okay. For the simple reason that the level of infection, the dynamic of infection in the community are still really disturbingly high. Like just yesterday there were close to 80,000 new infections and we've been hanging around 60, 75,000.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, almost 20 percent of Americans are fully vaccinated, but that's nowhere near herd immunity, which would require around a minimum of 70 percent of the population vaccinated. Meanwhile, the number of COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations is still rising because we're very bad at pandemic management.

Dr. Fauci urged Americans to get a vaccine if they haven't already, not that Republicans will listen to him.

He added: “If you are vaccinated, please remember that you still have to be careful and not get involved in crowded situations, particularly indoors where people are not wearing masks."

Obviously, Mall Doctor Paul flipped out.

Paul tweeted Monday:

Fauci continues to ignore 100 years of vaccine science.

His only real theme is "do what I say" even when it makes no sense.

If you've recovered or been vaccinated - go about your life. Eat, drink, work, open the schools.

Enough with the petty tyrants!

Sweet Christ.

OK, I can't believe I have to keep saying this, but Dr. Fauci isn't an elected official. He's not the president or a governor or in any actual way the boss of you. If a doctor says it's not OK to participate in one of the more lethal challenges from "Man vs. Food," that's not tyranny. It's a reasonable, informed medical opinion that you are free to ignore before trying to consume a six-pound, two-foot-long burrito in 90 minutes.

Far be it for us to assume Paul has daddy issues, but his own father is an equally creepy libertarian who doesn't believe members of a society have any shared responsibility to each other.

Not only has America not reached herd immunity, but the more contagious COVID-19 variant from the UK is spreading. There's a variant identified in South Africa that slapped the shit out of the Pfizer vaccine. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are 90 percent effective, which is great! However, airplane crashes have a 95 percent survival rate. That doesn't mean I want to be in one.

Dr. Fauci is urging caution as we inch closer to the finish line, and Paul is “fuck it, go about your life." He wants vaccinated people to eat, drink, man, woman their way through a pandemic. Paul also continues to make a distinction between those who've recovered from COVID-19 and those who have been vaccinated. The research shows that people who've had COVID-19 previously will need just one shot, but they should still get that one for optimal protection.

Although the former COVID-spreader-in-chief and first lady were vaccinated on their way out the door, Paul, as well as Senate's dumbest Republican Ron Johnson, refuses to get vaccinated because he's already had the virus. The vaccination would take all of 15 minutes, and they'd come to him.

Paul, who had COVID-19 in May 2020, said, "About 30 million people have gotten the infection naturally like myself. I'm going with the science on this one."

Paul speculated and said, "I have not chosen to be vaccinated because I got it naturally. The interesting thing is that no more than a handful of reports of people getting it again so there's every indication that having been infected with it provides strong, natural immunity."

Literal fucking Science magazine disagreed with Paul in its November article: More People Are Getting COVID-19 Twice, Suggesting Immunity Wanes Quickly In Some.

Reinfections with the four coronaviruses that cause the common cold occur after an average of 12 months, a team led by virologist Lia van der Hoek at Amsterdam University Medical Center recently showed. Van der Hoek thinks COVID-19 may follow that pattern: "I think we'd better prepare for a wave of reinfections over the coming months." That's "bad news for those who still believe in herd immunity through natural infections," she adds, and a worrisome sign for vaccines.

Dr. Fauci suggested we could need booster shots to maintain a level of protection from COVID-19. That's not the end of the world. We get a flu shot each year. Bottom line is listen to Dr. Fauci and ignore Rand Paul if you want to live. The end.

[The Hill]






https://science.slashdot.org/story/21/04/12/2259231/researchers-create-light-waves-that-can-penetrate-even-opaque-materials

Researchers Create Light Waves That Can Penetrate Even Opaque Materials (phys.org)

fahrbot-bot shares a report from Phys.Org:Why is sugar not transparent? Because light that penetrates a piece of sugar is scattered, altered and deflected in a highly complicated way. However, as a research team from TU Wien (Vienna) and Utrecht University (Netherlands) has now been able to show, there is a class of very special light waves for which this does not apply: for any specific disordered medium -- such as the sugar cube you may just have put in your coffee -- tailor-made light beams can be constructed that are practically not changed by this medium, but only attenuated. The light beam penetrates the medium, and a light pattern arrives on the other side that has the same shape as if the medium were not there at all. This idea of "scattering-invariant modes of light" can also be used to specifically examine the interior of objects. The results have now been published in the journal Nature Photonics.This method of finding light patterns that penetrate an object largely undisturbed could also be used for imaging procedures. "In hospitals, X-rays are used to look inside the body -- they have a shorter wavelength and can therefore penetrate our skin. But the way a light wave penetrates an object depends not only on the wavelength, but also on the waveform," says Matthias Kuhmayer, who works as a Ph.D. student on computer simulations of wave propagation. "If you want to focus light inside an object at certain points, then our method opens up completely new possibilities. We were able to show that using our approach the light distribution inside the zinc oxide layer can also be specifically controlled."

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2104.17 - 10:10

- Days ago = 2115 days ago


- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I plan to continue Hey Mom posts at least twice per week but will continue to post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.

No comments: