Though the current project started as a series of posts charting my grief journey after the death of my mother, I am no longer actively grieving. Now, the blog charts a conversation in living, mainly whatever I want it to be. This is an activity that goes well with the theme of this blog (updated 2018). The Sense of Doubt blog is dedicated to my motto: EMBRACE UNCERTAINTY. I promote questioning everything because just when I think I know something is concrete, I find out that it’s not.
Hey, Mom! The Explanation.
Here's the permanent dedicated link to my first Hey, Mom! post and the explanation of the feature it contains.
A Sense of Doubt blog post #2258 - Yoga Causes Psychosis and Other Lies from the Right - Weekly Hodge Podge for 2104.24
Did you know that yoga causes psychosis and just doing it once makes you a Hindu?
Neither did I, but then I am clearly not as smart as the right thinking folks of Alabama who have done all the research and understand how yoga as a religious ritual will transform the mind of any good Christian (or not so good one) and may make our children psychotic if it's allowed to be taught in the public schools of Alabama.
I learn so much from the Internet. I had no idea how dangerous yoga really is. What was I thinking?
I should also stop bringing my assault rifles to the national and state capitols, too, as I have heard that's not only dangerous but a crime.
Oh wait, no, not for me because I am white. Just all the other non-white people. Or liberals, better known as "libs."
Here we are again. Another W1EEKLY HODGE PODGE. This one has some good shit.
Here's my reaction:
And just an array of greatness, from more evidence that the Russians deployed energy weapons on American troops and TRUMP did nothing; Marjorie Taylor Greene must do yoga because there's further evidence of her psychosis and her being Hindu as she is dressing in an American Flag much like traditional Hindu garb; we're being guilted for contributing somehow to why "true Americans" attacked the nation's capitol in January and left people injured and dead (because it's not their fault for being violent psychotic after doing a lot of yoga in Georgia or somewhere because it's illegal in Alabama; and oh yeah, OBAMA is to blame for all the extremism, because again the extremists and white supremacists cannot possible to blame, accountable, or criminal (or not really white).
And so much more. anti-Black Lives Matter rants and rants about what Libs are responsible for all the child sex trafficking... more proof in the power of yoga to ruin minds.
Beware PSYCHOSIS, my friends. STAY AWAY FROM YOGA. And let's all move to Alabama where it's safe.
Oh and don't forget, we're close to 600,000 people who have died from Covid-19 in about a year. Clearly, these are all yoga doers whose psychosis caused them to think Covid-19 is real and not a Lib hoax and it killed them.
Remember Trump is secretly still president. It will all be okay soon once the My Pillow guy starts up his social media network and we turn the Russian energy weapons on all the Libs.
As you may or may not be aware, there has been a whole debate going on in Alabama about whether or not it should be legal to teach yoga in schools. It seems like a strange debate to be having, in this, the year 2021, but apparently things are different in Alabama.
Teaching yoga has been illegal in Alabama schools for almost 30 years, basically because Alabama conservatives think it is some kind of gateway drug to Hinduism, and also because they're kind of bitter about the whole "no prayer in school" thing. Some Christians also think it opens people up to "demonic possession."
However, recently, there's been a push to legalize yoga in Alabama. This largely comes from Democratic state Rep. Jeremy Gray, who sponsored the bill and who has practiced yoga since he was first introduced to it while he was playing football in college. The bill to lift the ban and allow yoga in schools — so long as kids didn't actually learn any Sanskrit — passed the House in March but had stalled in the Senate, largely due to these "concerns." It finally passed the Senate judiciary last week and will be debated on the floor this week, and some Christian groups are ready for a fight.
"Yoga is a very big part of the Hindu religion, and if this bill passes then instructors will be able to come into classrooms as young as kindergarten and bring these children through guided imagery, which is a spiritual exercise," Becky Gerritson, director of the conservative Alabama Eagletold state senators recently.
The National Center for Law & Policy, a group of Christian lawyers who usually spend their time freaking out over LGBTQ people and abortion, has even produced a totally batshit "fact sheet" meant to discourage lawmakers from legalizing yoga.
According to this "fact sheet," yoga can turn your kids into Hindus whether they realize it or not because just doing yoga makes you a Hindu. Somehow. By osmosis, probably.
Religion functions to explain ultimate problems of human life; connect individuals with suprahuman energies, beings, or transcendent realities; or cultivate spiritual awareness or virtues of ethical/moral character. There are two broad families of religion in America today: 1) belief/Word (e.g. Protestant Christianity) and 2) practice/experience (e.g. Hinduism). Protestants may not recognize practice/experience-oriented religions as religious because they think of religion as requiring that one believe and say certain things (doctrines/creeds); yet, for many Hindus/yogis, ritual practice expresses and instills religion even when no words are used because knowledge of the divine comes from experience, rather than intellectual study.
Hinduism is more accurately described as a dharma or a "way of life" more than a religion in the Western sense of the term, but it involves a whole lot more than just sitting in a lotus position and practicing mindfulness for 15 minutes.
That’s unless you ask the weird Christian lawyer group, which also maybe thinks Hinduism and Buddhism are the same thing.
The lotus position (sitting with feet crossed above or beneath the knees, depending on one's flexibility) symbolizes spiritual purity and enlightenment and is believed to aid the flow of spiritual energy Qtrana), facilitating meditation and ultimately samadhi, or union with God.[...]
Mindfulness is the seventh aspect of the eightfold path of Buddhism and the "heart of Buddhist meditation." Mindfulness relieves suffering by calming the mind to prepare for enlightenment.
Sure, yoga is a spiritual practice for billions of people and it is part of their religion. But that's really not what is going to be taught in schools. What's going to be taught in schools is the westernized version of the practice that actual Hindu people will happily assure you has almost nothing to do with their religion.
As an outsider, it seems to me that some Protestant Christians think that if something is "in" a religion, it necessarily comes from that religion, which is why they seem to think basic moral things like "don't steal" or "don't lie" or "don't cheat on your spouse" are "Christian values" and always talk about how our laws in the United States come from the Bible. As if people could not possibly have figured out that killing people was bad without God etching it into a tablet. Thus, they think that someone can't do something Hindu people do without actively going and becoming Hindu themselves, even if it's rebranded as "Christian Yoga."
What about Christian Yoga, Holy Yoga, Christoga, WhollyFit, Praise Moves, etc.? Relabeling yoga as "Christian" may not remove religious meanings associated with postures and breathing borrowed from non-Christian religions such as Hinduism.
How is it that they think religion works? Do they think that you can breathe yourself into Hinduism?
Of course, if the "Yoga is gonna make all the kids Hindu" tack doesn't work, they have a backup. The group also claims, without actually showing any evidence, that
Claims that scientific research supports yoga are based on poor-quality studies. Higher-quality studies show that yoga can be dangerous, causing injuries, death from stroke, and psychotic episodes. The American Yoga Association warns that yoga is unsafe for children under 16; the Mayo Clinic singles out Ashtanga yoga as inappropriate for children. There is scientific evidence that non-religious exercise (e.g. running, jump rope, soccer. aerobics, weight training) benefits physical health and self-esteem of children/youth, and the mole vigorous the better.
There are also studies showing that prayer and Bible reading are more effective than physical exercise in improving physical/mental health and lengthening life; teenagers who attend religious services at least weekly have fewer problems with substance abuse, are less violent, commit fewer crimes. and are less likely to get into trouble with school or legal authorities. Even if science did show that yoga is beneficial, this would not make it non-religious.
See how they try to slip the Bible in?
The only kind of "yoga" that has been known to cause a "psychotic episode" is Bikram yoga (aka Hot Yoga). Does this group seriously think they're gonna have third graders doing Bikram yoga? The only example I can find of someone suffering a stroke while doing yoga is of one adult woman attempting a very advanced hollowback headstand pose. Do they think children will be doing that? Because no, they're not going to be doing that. They're gonna be doing child's pose and downward facing dog and warrior pose and they're going to do relaxation exercises. All of these things are far less likely to result in "injury" than anything I was doing in gymnastics when I was six.
The fact is potentially dangerous for anyone with no experience to jump right into an advanced form of practically any physical activity there is. That is why the bunny hill exists. That is why you can't go en pointe at your first ballet class. Obviously.
No one has to let their kid do yoga if they don't want — surely, schools would allow kids to opt out if their parents felt very strongly about it. But having it actually be illegal is patently ridiculous.
I'm gonna go do some half-pigeon pose for a bit (while still managing to be an atheist, just an atheist with limber hip flexors), but you can all stay here and chat, because this is now your open thread!
Hmmmmmm shares a report from Politico:The Pentagon has briefed top lawmakers on intelligence surrounding suspected directed-energy attacks against U.S. troops, and officials identified Russia as a likely culprit, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter. The briefings included information about injuries sustained by U.S. troops in Syria, the people said. The investigation includes one incident in Syria in the fall of 2020 in which several troops developed flu-like symptoms, two people familiar with the Pentagon probe said. After this article was published, Gen. Frank McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, told lawmakers during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing that he has seen "no evidence" of such attacks against U.S. troops in the Middle East.
The investigation is part of a broader effort to look into directed-energy attacks on U.S. officials across multiple agencies in recent years. Since late 2016, close to 50 officials have reported symptoms of a mysterious illness that became known as "Havana syndrome" among U.S. diplomats posted in Cuba. Symptoms included acute ringing and pressure in the ears, as well as loss of hearing and balance, fatigue and residual headaches. Some victims have suffered long-term brain damage. A report commissioned by the State Department and released in December pointed to "directed, pulsed radiofrequency energy" as the most probable cause for the "Havana syndrome" incidents.
House Republicans without an "inside racist voice" created a fuss this weekend when they banded together to form an openly white supremacist caucus within a GOP that's already pretty racist. Shocking absolutely no one, the founding members were Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Paul Gosar of Arizona, Louie Gohmert of Texas, and Matt Gaetz of Florida and potentially your finer federal prisons.
Republican leadership and rank-and-file members alike decried the AFC's "nativist" sentiments. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who enables the useless idiots in his caucus, invoked Abraham Lincoln, who radically advanced civil rights while incurring the (fatal) wrath of Southern racists. Modern Republicans have demonstrated zero interest in doing either. They won't even support legislation defending minority voting rights, but hey, they'll keep calling themselves the "Party of Lincoln" because it's not like he's alive to sue for defamation.
The so-called “America First Caucus" claimed it would follow in the one-term loser's footsteps, which we hope means not winning re-election. The AFC released a statement declaring its willingness to "step on some toes and sacrifice sacred cows for the good of the American nation" — unless, of course, those toes belong to that mooing fool from Mar-a-Lago.
Greene quickly backed away from her self-ignited dumpster fire Saturday.
Nick Dyer, Greene's spokesperson, told CNN in an email on Saturday afternoon the Georgia Republican is not "launching anything." "The Congresswoman wants to make clear that she is not launching anything. This was an early planning proposal and nothing was agreed to or approved," he said in an email to CNN, referring to a flier promoting the caucus, obtained by Punchbowl News, that used inflammatory rhetoric.
He added that "she didn't approve that language and has no plans to launch anything."
Here's a sample of that controversial language Greene claims she didn't approve, even though it's consistent with every gross word she's said since entering public life:
America is a nation with a border, and a culture, strengthened by a common respect for uniquely Anglo-Saxon traditions. History has shown that societal trust and political unity are threatened when foreign citizens are imported en-masse into a country.
It's true that United States history is drenched in blood, but the very descendants of the "foreign citizens" who swept into the "New World" en masse have no moral standing to lecture anyone about "societal trust and political unity." European invaders never hesitated to violate trust and reject unity while advancing their imperialist goals.
I believe in America First with all my heart and that means every American, of every race, creed, and color.
I will never back down and I will never stop fighting for America First.
There are tens of millions of Americans who agree.
Republicans who pose as respectable, such as Rep. Nancy Mace from South Carolina, tried to whitewash the "America First" rhetoric. She tweeted: "America First should mean ALL Americans. Wherever you are from, whatever you believe, as long as you want to be here and be free." It's delightful to see Republicans scrambling to salvage a politically damaging slogan, especially after so many exploited “defund the police" for electoral success. No actual elected Democrat supported defunding the police, whereas “America First" was the former White House squatter's mantra, which he primarily defines as putting himself first. Mace, like every Republican, will eventually have to pledge her allegiance to the one-term loser. It's not a question of if but when and whether she'll look as pathetic as Nikki Haley.
The initial “America First" flier repeated President Lost Cause's Big Lie that the 2020 election was stolen. The AFC caucus would "work towards an end to mail-in voting, implementation of national voter ID and substantive investigations into mass voter fraud perpetrated during the 2020 election." These kooks are full-on Jim Crow.
Historian Kevin Kruse noted that the AFC's racist assertions about the nation's "uniquely Anglo-Saxon traditions" and the threat from "foreign" elements were common a century ago, when the US contended with a "deadly pandemic, economic turmoil, race riots and a surge in immigration all at once."
Madison Grant's 1916 "The Passing of the Great Race" complained about unwanted demographic changes in terms familiar to us today. White Anglo-Saxon Protestants, he warned, were not reproducing children fast enough to keep pace with "the Slovak, the Italian, the Syrian, and the Jew." Established "old stock" Americans, he grumbled, were "being literally driven off the streets of New York City by the swarms of Polish Jews."
In the 1920 publication "The Rising Tide of Color: The Threat Against White World Supremacy," Lothrop Stoddard made the same claims, warning that white Americans were being engulfed by the more "fertile" nonwhite races. Americans of "Anglo-Saxon origin," he insisted, had to restrict immigration to preserve their country for "future generations who have a right to demand of us that they shall be born white in a white man's land."
Racist dullard Tom Buchanan in The Great Gatsby was a big fan of "The Rise of the Colored Empires by this man Goddard." That was F. Scott Fitzgerald's not-so-subtle reference to Lothrop Stoddard's The Rising Tide Of Color: The Threat Against White World Supremacy. Buchanan and Tucker Carlson share similar concerns.
The baseless accusation of mass voter fraud is only the second biggest Big Lie that the AFC promotes. The true Big Lie is that Americans of European descent were native to this land and have always been its caretakers. The truth is that Europeans invaded America, rained genocide on its actual inhabitants, and now want to lock the door behind them.
Texas, which Louie Gohmert represents poorly, was once Mexican territory before American settlers decided they'd prefer the land for themselves and led a revolt in 1836. Not surprisingly, white Americans in Texas were peeved that Mexico had abolished slavery. Less than two centuries later, Republicans visit Texas border towns with decidedly non-Anglo-Saxon names and cry about “invasion."
Florida was under Spanish rule for almost 40 years after the US declared its independence. People of English and Scots-Irish descent fled the backwoods of Georgia and South Carolina and moved into northern Florida. Spanish authorities weren't thrilled, but they weren't able to effectively police the border crossings. These pioneer settlers became known as the Florida crackers (no, really). "Settlers" and “pioneers" are key words in white supremacist folklore. The terminology is denied to anyone who crosses the US border today. Those would-be settlers aren't bold pioneers risking everything for a better life. They are simply "illegals."
Arizona is also a spoil of war with Mexico. Paul Gosar probably thinks the US won the state on a quiz show.
Nativist is too flattering a description for the "America First" crowd, as it invokes a finder's keepers philosophy that doesn't apply to the United States' imperialist history. Too many proud "Anglo-Saxons" act as if they found a wallet stuffed with cash and are bravely defending their prize from the undeserving. But what they truly fear are the original owners reclaiming what belongs to them. "America First" is a call for justice denied.
This week, Nate Cohn at the New York Times suggested that violent rightwing extremism and the demonstrated authoritarian bent within the GOP aren't exclusively to blame for the fall of American democracy. No, the true problem is that Democrats don't want to Netflix and chill with unhinged conspiracy theorists.
The country is increasingly split into camps that don't just disagree on policy and politics — they see the other as alien, immoral, a threat. Such political sectarianism is now on the march.
Eric Boehlert pointed out how Cohn "could only find examples of rightwing behavior that threatens our democracy, yet he insisted Both Sides were to blame." This is a common rightwing talking point. Sensible MSNBC-ready Republicans try to elevate themselves from the Marjorie Taylor Greenes while acknowledging bad GOP behavior, but they make sure to blame Democrats as well. Liberals are the Devils whispering in their ears, but as Lucifer himself once said, “Wenever make any of them do anything."
Republican Senator Ben Sasse from Nebraska made similar arguments in his 2018 book, Them: Why We Hate Each Other — and How to Heal, so from the jump, Cohn is regurgitating conservative rhetoric that buries the larger problem rather than appraising it.
The first image we see in Cohn's piece after the headline, "Why Political Sectarianism Is a Growing Threat to American Democracy," is a photo of MAGA supporters confronting Joe Biden supporters outside the Pennsylvania Convention Center as ballots were still being counted after the election. One of President Lost Cause's supporters is wearing a “Not Today Satan" shirt. We're presumably supposed to wonder why these fellow Americans are so angry with each other. The election's over. They should go home to their families or their cats or their cat families.
However, almost everyone who voted for Biden wanted to move on, to heal. When the election was called on November 7, political scientist and author Ian Bremmer tweeted: “Now is the time for every Biden supporter to reach out to one person who voted for Trump. Empathize with them. Tell them you know how they feel (you do, from 2016). Come up with one issue you can agree on."
Democrat Pete Buttigieg shared similar sentiments: "If someone you love and care about voted the other way, today might be a good day to reach out. Not to talk politics, but to talk about things that will remind them (and yourself) why you love and care about them."
The one-term loser's supporters spat in our faces. They didn't congratulate us however insincerely. Instead, they embraced a Big Lie and rejected both democracy and reality. Biden supporters didn't want to show up at the Pennsylvania Convention Center that day. They probably had better things to do, but a sitting president had refused to concede an election he lost.
Cohn acknowledges MAGA's "efforts to subvert the peaceful transition of power," but laments that “the two political parties see the other as an enemy." What, pray tell, is the option when one political party (the Republicans) actively demonizes another (the Democrats, for those paying attention) and refuses to even accept their victories as legitimate?
It's an outlook that makes compromise impossible and encourages elected officials to violate norms in pursuit of an agenda or an electoral victory. It turns debates over changing voting laws into existential showdowns. And it undermines the willingness of the loser to accept defeat — an essential requirement of a democracy.
Yes, it is awful that REPUBLICANS keep doing these things. This paragraph reads as if dictated by Mitch McConnell. Republicans attempting to disenfranchise minority voters is literally an existential showdown. Black people aren't behaving like melodramatic teenagers over white supremacists' efforts to disenfranchise us. Baseless accusations of voter fraud aren't policy differences. This was cruel slander.
Whether religious or political, sectarianism is about two hostile identity groups who not only clash over policy and ideology, but see the other side as alien and immoral. It's the antagonistic feelings between the groups, more than differences over ideas, that drive sectarian conflict.
This is blatant whitewashing. White supremacists stormed the Capitol, some of whom were carrying the Confederate flag, and Cohn still can't describe the “two hostile identity groups" as angry white people and minorities who just want to exist. This “sectarian conflict" isn't a result of liberals and conservatives disagreeing over marginal tax rates. Many white liberals and moderates desperately wish that was the sole source of debate, so they could enjoy holiday gatherings again. But white conservatives realized decades ago that cultural resentment and outright bigotry could more effectively get out the vote than trickle-down economics.
Defending his article on Twitter, Cohn accused Democrats of feeling that “Republicans are an immoral, alien enemy." A self-described “very liberal" white guy agreed with Cohn and claimed Democrats believed Republicans were “evil and subhuman," which proved Cohn's point about sectarian hostility. This is what Malcolm X described as the oppressors' guilt complex. They feel as if you're calling them "evil and subhuman" if you just accurately describe their actions! This is why Republicans get up in their feels when their voter suppression laws are described as “Jim Crow 2.0."
Cohn infantilizes the modern GOP, suggesting they are simply acting out because they are in the minority. But Republicans are just as brutal to us when they're in power. Cohn also can't offer examples of Democrats embracing violence or authoritarianism in reaction to the past four years. Democrats nominated Joe Biden for president, and Republicans still refused to accept the election results.
We don't “hate" Republicans just because we recognize their demonstrated behavior. The “sectarian hostilities" might seem more blatant now to white liberals and moderates, including Cohn, but they've existed since America's founding. The white majority enslaved and later segregated people they considered “immoral, alien, and subhuman." Now marginalized groups can vocalize their complaints more loudly, but that doesn't mean they didn't exist previously, even during the so-called “good old days."
The New York Times might've published The 1619 Project, but I wonder if everyone who works there bothered to read it.
Former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) lost his House seat back in 2014, but he's making waves again with bold claims about the recent history of the two main parties in United States politics.
Continuing the Republican tradition of blaming former President Barack Obama for a vast array of developments in the United States, Cantor claimed Obama was responsible for the normalization of extremism in American politics.
Watch below.
In an interview with CNN, Cantor said:
"I don't doubt for a second that the level of craziness has increased in Washington over the last few years in both parties. But certainly when we were serving back during the Obama administration, there was plenty of indicators that we had an extreme element on both sides of the aisle."
Cantor went on to say that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009—one of Obama's first pieces of legislation as President, designed to offset the fallout from the Great Recession—was responsible.
"One of the things that happened early on in the Obama administration was he laid down the gauntlet with his so-called stimulus bill, and drew a party line really brightly, which encouraged some of this backlash on the extreme end of the spectrums, on our side and his."
The modern Republican party's embrace of conspiracy theories and increasingly blatant racist rhetoric is largely attributed to the 2008 presidential election, when the late Senator John McCain (R-AZ) tapped then-Alaska Governor Sarah Palin to join him on the ticket as his Vice Presidential nominee.
Palin associated Obama with domestic terrorists and encouraged the rise of the Tea Party, many of whose supporters believed Obama was secretly a Muslim born in Kenya.
A Frontline documentary released last year traced the rise in Republican online disinformation to Palin's rhetoric, with McCain's former campaign manager, Steve Schmidt, saying:
"She is the first of a generation of politicians who live in a post-truth environment. She was, and there's no polite way to say it, but a serial liar. She would say things that are simply not true, or things that were picked up from the Internet, and this obliteration of fact from fiction, of truth from lie, has become now endemic in American politics. But it started then."
In less than a decade, the conspiracy theories embraced by the Tea Party would be dwarfed by the mass delusion known as QAnon, and the continued normalization of lies from former President Donald Trump and his allies in the Republican party.
People called Cantor out for his rewriting of history.
Others noted that Obama's race was a substantial part of Republican voters' misgivings with his administration.
Before the interview's conclusion, Cantor said he would support Trump if he ran for President again in 2024.
This weekend, many of America's wackiest humans either spoke at or attended "Clay Clark's Health and Freedom Rally," a QAnon COVID-denial conference. Michael Flynn was there, Sidney Powell, MyPillow Guy Mike Lindell, discredited anti-vax ex-doctor Andrew Wakefield and even actor Jim Caviezel, whose bizarre rant about "adrenochroming the children" we delved into on Saturday.
Not to be outdone by by some fly-by-night Hollywood hunk, when attorney Lin Wood took the stage, he not only explicitly endorsed Q, but also claimed the Clintons, the Obamas, the Bidens and the Bushes were all "involved in sex trafficking."
He said:
WOOD: They've accused me of being a QAnon conspiracy theorist. Why? Because they're telling you that I'm a bad messenger. They're trying to attack me because they can't attack Q. Because Q is the truth! This is about the children, for God's sake!
Send this videotape – send it to Hollywood. Hey Clay, send it to the House of Windsor. Hey Clay, send it to Bill Gates. Send it to the damn Illuminati! Let them hear the truth and whatever they do to me, I don't fear them at all. Send it to the Vatican!
Send it to the politicians, the Clintons, the Obamas, the Bidens, the Bushes. Send it to those people because they are involved in child sex trafficking. It's time to the tell the truth to America!
You know, I like how they always throw the Bushes into this, just to seem "balanced." Not the Reagans, though. Never the Reagans.
Wood is right about one thing though: he should not fear the Illuminati, mainly because the Illuminati doesn't actually exist. It did exist, there were people who called themselves that in the 1700s, but they are all quite dead by now and thus probably not particularly concerned with who Lin Wood accuses of child sex trafficking. However, given that Wood has actually worked on several high profile defamation cases, you would think he might be a bit concerned that accusing people of something like child sex trafficking could actually get him into trouble.
You are perhaps wondering now (maybe) if you are supposed to know who this Clay Clark person even is. You are not. Basically he is a guy who seems pretty scammy and does this pose in his Twitter avi.
An extremely douchey looking man in glasses holding his two pointer fingers up to his chin and looking PENSIVE.
He is doing that same pose in approximately 90 percent of the photos of him I was able to find online, so clearly he thinks it is a very good look. According to his Twitter bio, he is the "Host of the Thrivetime Show Podcast, Former Oklahoma Young SBA Entrepreneur of the Year, Founder of Several Multi-Million Dollar Businesses, Author and Artist." He also has some website where he gives advice to aspiring entrepreneurs, which is a thing people who are full of shit frequently seem to call themselves.
While I was unable to find what multi-million dollar businesses he founded, I was able to find a video in which he speaks to some lady about whether or not he is the "Clark" that Trump prophet Kim Clement spoke of in a prophecy.
"Could Clay Clark be the TRUMP & CLARK Kim Clement spoke about?"
He also has some very interesting thoughts on what Antifa and Black Lives Matter are. Surprise! He thinks they are about summoning the dead. Like the Fox Sisters, but with different outfits and probably less toe-cracking.
Monday, we were granted a wonderful gift, in the form of one of the greatest lawsuits of our time: MyPillow v. Dominion. Dominion is already suing MyPillow and its CEO, Mike Lindell, for $1.3 billion. Not to be outdone, MyPillow has now sued Dominion for $1.6 billion in very real and totally-not-made-up damages.
Declaring that Dominion is the government, MyPillow's suit claims that Dominion is doing "lawfare" and cancel culturing its First Amendment rights. (Yes, this is basically what the complaint argues. No, this is not a thing.)
This lawsuit, says MyPillow, is really on behalf of the entire public square and marketplace of ideas against the oppressive tyranny of the voting tech manufacturer.
Dominion is using the legal process as a weapon to suppress free speech. In contrast, MyPillow brings this action to open debate and expand free speech. Indeed, MyPillow would move this entire debate to the public square for a full airing of all facts and opinions on the subject. This lawsuit is brought in support of the marketplace of ideas and to remedy the grave harm that has been suffered by MyPillow as a result of Dominion's suppression of speech and attacks on the Company.
Sadly, neither the public square nor the marketplace of ideas is named as a plaintiff.
MyPillow's suit repeatedly claims that it was Mike Lindell, and not MyPillow, who liked to flip out about "stolen elections" and something about dead Hugo Chavez. Which, fair enough. Except for the fact that the entire complaint is about why Lindell's Dominion conspiracy theories are true.
The lawsuit repeatedly claims it's vindicating MyPillow's free speech rights ... but also says MyPillow isn't engaging in speech that needs protection.
Amazingly, the lawsuit goes straight from "MyPillow didn't say that!" to "MyPillow's right to say that is being trampled!" Claiming that Dominion is "a governmental actor," MyPillow alleges that Dominion "allowed manipulation or changing of votes in the 2020 election, as well as suppressed public debate about the election which deprived MyPillow of its rights."
But I thought MyPillow was just a pillow company that didn't comment on elections?
Seemingly without irony, most of the complaint's 51 pages are then spent rehashing Lindell's conspiracy theories about the election.
Evidence that Dominion's voting systems actually were hacked in the 2020 election continues to accumulate. Questions and concerns are growing, not subsiding. The adverse impact of electronic voting systems on the 2020 election was significant. A prudent, robust democracy cannot afford to ignore this evidence if it hopes to survive.
But now Dominion is doing lawfare! FOR SHAME!
In response to Lindell's exercise of his First Amendment free speech rights, Dominion launched its lawfare campaign against both Lindell and MyPillow.
And maybe Dominion being the government would be okay in places like Venezuela, but not here in the US of A!
Dominion's and its lawyers' widespread intimidation tactics of ordinary citizens may be routine in a Third World country—but they are abhorrent in America.
America, fuck yeah!
But, I mean, how can you NOT love a complaint that invokes Joseph McCarthy ...
Harkening back to some of the worst days in our history, Dominion has taken a page out of Joseph McCarthy's playbook by creating a blacklist for public scorn leading to both reputational and economic destruction. From high-powered news organizations to regular citizens and private home-bedding companies, no one is safe.
... more than once ...
Dominion's campaign descends from a long and sad history in this country, the McCarthy era in which lives and organizations were destroyed, and families torn apart, for being labeled a Communist. Just as during that era being associated with a suspected Communist could end a professional career, so too today, those who, like MyPillow are merely associated with a critic of Dominion and the integrity of the 2020 election, face expulsion from public life in large parts of America.
... for the proposition that a private company filing defamation lawsuits is the same as the blacklists in the 1940s and 50s?
Oh, and can someone ask Lindell if he's fighting for the free speech of communists? tyia.
There's also the cute part where MyPillow whines that "Dominion has filed a $1.3 billion lawsuit against MyPillow and its CEO. Yet Dominion's annual revenues are only about $90 million" and then demands $1.6 billion from Dominion.
But it needs this money because Dominion is forcing people to stop using this pillow company and use other pillow companies instead!
MyPillow has lost numerous major customers who ended their long-term relationships to sell MyPillow's product line due to Dominion's highly publicized attacks.
Oh yes, I am absolutely certain that MyPillow is losing customers because of Dominion and not because of its unhinged CEO not backing down even after he helped incite an insurrection and then tried to blame it on "antifa."
As the result of Defendants' actions, and as expected and intended by them, Plaintiff suffered the loss of substantial property interests, including, but not limited to, loss of long-standing business relationships, loss of supplier contracts, and loss of access to promotional access in media.
Plaintiff was not provided due process in connection with the loss of its property interests caused by Defendants.
Actually, as a matter of fact, MyPillow is receiving due process right now! In addition to this masterpiece, MyPillow filed a motion to dismiss the Dominion lawsuit in the District of DC, aka the process it is due when a lawsuit is filed.
Defendants' reprisal actions were motivated, at least in part, by MyPillow's and its CEO's exercise of their free speech rights protected under the First Amendment and, as applied against the states and their political subdivisions and agents, the Fourteenth Amendment.
Nope. Dominion is still not the government.
Although MyPillow v. Dominion should have been filed as a countersuit to Dominion's defamation complaint in federal court in DC, it was instead filed in the District of Minnesota. MyPillow's lawyers say it's not a countersuit despite the fact that the complaint itself says its purpose is "to remedy the grave harm that has been suffered by MyPillow as a result of Dominion's suppression of speech and attacks on the Company."
MyPillow is represented by very serious law firm Parker Daniels Kibort, which has a video on its site explaining "the ideals of what our law firm is all about" that shows off photos on the wall of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan.
Lindell (joined by Alan Dershowitz, whose name is notably absent from the complaint), announced the lawsuit on his new "free speech" website where you can't swear or say "dear Lord" unless you're praying.
Whatever. Sure.
Here is the complaint, in all its glory:
Follow Jamie on Twitter! All the cool kids are doing it.
It's quite a treat watching Stacey Abrams spank Republicans during the Senate hearings about voting rights. They clearly didn't expect that this fierce Black woman would come correct. It's as if they assumed she'd melt under the pressure of their rigorous questioning and confess that she knows nothing about voting laws or birthing babies.
That didn't happen.
Abrams has delivered a master class on the subject of Why She Should Be Georgia's Next Governor. It's informative but also entertaining, especially when she humiliates Republicans so much their own mamas don't want to talk to them.
Tuesday, Texas Senator John Cornyn tried to push the rightwing talking point that Georgia's new voter suppression laws are no more restrictive than similar laws in so-called “blue" states. But Democrats just won Georgia's presidential and Senate elections. They're not the sore losers here. This is a dumb argument even if it were based in facts, which it's not.
CORNYN: Georgia has a no-excuse absentee voting provision in that law. As Miss Jones, I think, has said, certainly in her written statement, Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York do not have any no-excuse absentee voting. Are the voting laws in Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and New York racist?
ABRAMS: I would say that they are behind the eight-ball and they need to be improved. And that's why I support For the People Act voting rights provisions that would expand access to no-excuses absentee voting.
See how seamlessly she dropped that promo for the H.R. 1 bill? She should host a podcast. Abrams went on to say that what's relevant is how certain behaviors are targeted.
ABRAMS: The state of Georgia targeted communities that used these resources for the first time to their benefit. And thus, after 15 years of Republican-dominated use of absentee balloting, it suddenly changed its mind about the utility, the processing, the timeliness, and the ability —
The lady was making too much sense, so Cornyn cut her off and kept trying to press her on whether states that vote for Democrats are racist. When she wouldn't fall for his clever ruse, he accused her of “filibustering" his question. Yeah, now Cornyn resents the filibuster. Eventually, Abrams told Cornyn, "I'm happy to respond to your questions. But if you're going to mischaracterize my responses, that's inappropriate." She might've sent him to his room, as well.
Republicans had tried to grill Abrams on voter ID, which polls show most voters support, but apparently no one of their staff informed them that Abrams very much supports voter ID. There was no “gotcha" there. Instead, she explained, without breaking a sweat, that she opposed "restrictive voter identification laws that narrow the set of permissible materials." Glad that was cleared up.
They spent a lot of time defending the honor of perfect angel GOP officials who just wanted to pass a racist voting law without people calling them racist. Abrams had to remind these dummies that Jim Crow laws were covertly racist. That was the point. If they could've flat-out banned Black people from voting, they wouldn't have bothered with poll taxes and jellybean jar quizzes. That's a lot of extra effort, and they could've eaten those jellybeans.
ABRAMS: The intent always matters, sir. And that is the point of this conversation. That is the point of the Jim Crow narrative, that Jim Crow did not simply look at the activities. It looked at the intent. It looked at the behaviors. And it targeted behaviors that were disproportionately used by people of color.
Then came Louisiana Senator and Foghorn Leghorn impersonator John Kennedy. His grand plan was for Abrams to just tell him what she didn't like about Georgia's voter suppression laws. Maybe he thought she'd forgotten. It's been almost a whole month and the Negro's short term memory is limited, at least according to Kennedy's childhood encyclopedias. (OK, I made that up. There's no evidence Kennedy has read an encyclopedia, for children or otherwise.)
KENNEDY: Tell me specifically, just give me a list of the provisions that you object to.
Oh, the clever old white man's got her! She never could've prepared for a question that's the bar exam equivalent to “Why is law?" Fortunately, Abrams just happened to have noted voting rights activist Stacey Abrams right here!
ABRAMS: It shortens the federal run-off period from nine weeks to four weeks, it restricts the time a voter can request and return an absentee ballot application, it requires that voters have a photo identification or some other form of identification that they are willing to surrender in order to participate in the absentee ballot process ...
He'd gone about 50 seconds without interrupting her, which few men can do without exploding. He asked, “What else?" and she kept telling him while he kept trying to interrupt before he gave up and said, “I get the idea." (He doesn't get any ideas. He's a fucking idiot.)
I could watch Stacey Abrams outclass Republican men all day, but I should probably eat dinner at some point.
You know, we've never cared too much for congressional decorum, and we especially don't love it now, when we have one American political party that's forced to try to govern at odds with another political party, the Republican Party, that's fundamentally un-American to its rotten core. So as Republicans get more authoritarian and more racist, we're glad to see some members of Congress just cutting the shit and treating them like they deserve to be treated.
We loved watching Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters tell GOP Rep. Jim Jordan to shut his fucking face last week.
And yesterday, in a hearing on the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act before the Chauvin verdict came down, Rep. Val Demings took her turn telling Jordan to shut his fucking face.
Demings, an actual former cop who ran the Orlando Police Department, was making a point about how Republicans are all hot to trot for cops when it's politically convenient — you know, when supporting cops helps them prop up racism and violence against Black Americans — but the second it's not convenient anymore, they don't give a shit about them. Congressional Republicans especially don't appear to give a shit about the Capitol Police officers who protected them on January 6, the day the authoritarian shitheel Republicans worship ordered a domestic terrorist attack on the Capitol, as they tried to advance the Big Lie that their hero had actually won an election he lost in a landslide.
Republicans were advancing some idiot-ass amendment to the hate crimes bill that's intended to ban defunding the police. Again, this is a hate crimes bill aimed at addressing the alarming rise of hate and violence against Asian Americans, which is largely happening because the Republicans' god used the pandemic to incite hatred against Asian Americans. The Republicans' amendment is "irrelevant," as Demings noted.
And besides, she was busy making a point about how gross it is for Republicans to use police as "pawns" when they need to, but don't care about them otherwise. (This is largely how Republicans treat US servicemembers, also.)
And oh, Jim Jordan didst begin hee-ing and haw-ing in anger, which with him always reminds us of a coach trying and failing to teach an academic class, which is probably a pretty apt comparison, considering his history.
Demings — again, an actual former cop — did not give a flying fuck.
"I have the floor, Mr. Jordan," Demings exclaimed, banging her open palm on the table. "Did I strike a nerve?"
Yeah she struck a nerve. And she did not just exclaim that. She YELLED it at that greasy-ass ill-groomed loser. And she pointed at his stupid face and she said "to utilize [law enforcement officers] as political pawns PISSES ME OFF."
All of this made the washed up Little League coach who was just pretty sure one day he'd make it to the majors but didn't because he wasn't good enough VERY UPSET AGAIN! Jordan little-manned at Demings some more, making protests about nobody knows his motives, he knows his motives, and he will not have this Democrat impugning his motives, blah blah blah, nobody gives a shit what he actually said.
Here is more of the content of what Demings was saying.
"You know, it's interesting to see my colleagues on the other side of the aisle support the police when it is politically convenient to do so," Demings said. "Law enforcement officers risk their lives every day. They deserve better."
And here are more of Val Demings's words, about January 6, and the utterly disgusting hypocrisy of Republicans who cared more about helping their Dear Leader usher in a new era of white supremacist fascism than they cared about the cops they supposedly care about now because it's politically convenient.
"My colleagues on the other side of the aisle were silent," she continued. "As one person after another person took the microphone and said, 'Go down there and engage in combat,' 'fight like hell.' They used the bicycle racks as deadly missiles against the law enforcement officers that you all say you care about so much."
She later said, "Don't support them when it's politically convenient for you to do so. Support them when they're under attack, by people fighting them and spraying them and knocking them to the ground and beating them with poles, carrying the American flags and pipes."
You'll want to watch the whole video, though. One does not simply read about people telling Jim Jordan to go fuck rakes. One watches that.
Florida's COVID-19 cases have increased 14 percent in the past two weeks, and hospitalizations have risen by 12 percent in the same period. It's a surge that won't quit, but the state's big dumb Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, wears his “Mission Accomplished" banner on his sleeve.
Friday, DeSantis said it made no sense for people who are already vaccinated to continue wearing masks. This ignores guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which advises that fully vaccinated people should still take precautions to protect themselves and others, like nerds. This includes wearing a mask and social distancing when in public and around unvaccinated people.
Only 24 percent of Floridians are fully vaccinated, which is nowhere close to herd immunity. Republicans refuse to accept how vaccinations work. If you fill the coffeemaker but don't turn it on, you'll never enjoy a cup of coffee. Don't shout at the coffeemaker. This is your own fault.
Here's what this fool said on the day when Florida reported 7,000 COVID-19 new cases and 92 deaths:
DeSANTIS: My view is if you get a vaccine. The vaccines are effective. You're immune. So act immune. If you tell people the opposite, then gee, if it's not effective for them or it's not gonna change anything, then what's the point of going through it?
OK, in the interest of journalistic fairness, DeSantis at least conceded that vaccines are effective, so he's a step above Tucker Carlson. But he's feeding the instant gratification mentality among conservatives. The vaccine rollout has gone pretty well so far, but too many people just can't wait until we've achieved herd immunity, even while COVID-19 variants spread across the country.
DeSANTIS: I also think it's a problem that people, where, you're telling people to get a vaccine and yet people who have been vaccinated for months are wearing two masks.
It's been months, which is like FOREVER. Look, Einstein, over the past week, there were an average of 68,406 new cases per day in the United States. We're not done with this yet.
DeSANTIS: If the vaccine is effective, why would you be wearing two masks? Like some of these folks are doing. It doesn't make sense.
We've been over this. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are 90 percent effective, which is less than 100 percent. This advanced arithmetic apparently escapes DeSantis. Wearing masks and social distancing enhance vaccine protection. It's not virtue signaling for suckers.
Dr. Ashish K. Jha, dean of Brown University School of Public Health, said on CNN Sunday that outdoor COVID-19 infections are rare and occur "when large groups gather in packed spaces, such as rallies." It's probably safe to go outside without a mask, and Dr. Jha expects states to start lifting outdoor mask mandates soon. However, DeSantis never showed much interest in sensible COVID-19 restrictions. He's actively promoted dining inside restaurants, and even before the vaccine rollout began, Floridians were packed inside bars, drinking and partying unmasked.
DeSantis has bashed New York for its COVID-19-related shutdowns, but unlike Florida, New York's confirmed cases and hospitalizations have both decreased over the past two weeks by 23 and 10 percent, respectively. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo (who's a creep, but that's another post)said last month, "We can see the light at the end of the tunnel, but until we get there it is more important than ever for each and every New Yorker to wear a mask, socially distance, and follow all safety guidelines."
Dr. Anthony Fauci has to put up with GOP idiots accusing him of denying Americans our civil liberties. He's described this as “frustrating," which is a polite understatement. Polls show that about 43 percent of Republicans stubbornly refuse to get vaccinated, and the rest are annoyed they can't immediately do whatever they want. Naturally, they don't blame the dumber members of their political tribe. Instead, they rant about the tyrannical left. It's really goddamn exhausting.
ALSO... I am seeing a big discrepancy between the Johns Hopkins data in death totals and WORLDOMETER data, which aggregates data from many more sources. Could this be the slow down due to the change in how the CDC obtains the data, having it filter first through Health and Human Services department.
WEEKLY PANDEMIC REPORT - JOHNS HOPKINS
Anyway, as usual, here's the weekly links to the data about cases (lower than reality) and deaths (lower than reality, also) due to COVID-19.
Worldometer manually analyzes, validates, and aggregates data from thousands of sources in real time and provides global COVID-19 live statisticsfor a wide audience of caring people around the world.
Over the past 15 years, our statistics have been requested by, and provided to Oxford University Press, Wiley, Pearson, CERN, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), The Atlantic, BBC, Milton J. Rubenstein Museum of Science & Technology, Science Museum of Virginia, Morgan Stanley, IBM, Hewlett Packard, Dell, Kaspersky, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Amazon Alexa, Google Translate, the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), the U2 concert, and many others.
I’m just going to go ahead and confess something right now: I really enjoy watching angry white people lose their shit over the “racism” of Black Lives Matter.
They don’t understand the movement because they view the world through a very white lens, and they want desperately to believe American racism died in the ‘60s, so now that BLM is a mainstream concept, you could run a water park the size of West Africa on the flow of white tears they produce. Y’all can waste your time arguing with them if you want; I’m going to buy myself a Slip-n-Slide.
Anyway, a white U.S. Army drill sergeant recently got his extra salty-ass arrested in Sumter, S.C. after he refused to leave a grocery store that refused to sell him liquor, according to WBTV 3.
For reasons unknown to Black people like me who don’t give a single, solitary fuck about fragile white feelings, the man, who has been identified as 27-year-old John Walter Miles, launched into a drunken rant about how Black Lives Matter “is the most racist fucking thing we’ve ever fucking seen.”
Now, if I was to bother arguing with the fake-oppressed melanin-nots, I might be inclined to point out how ridiculous it is that anyone would consider BLM to be “the most racist fucking thing we’ve ever fucking seen,” despite America’s history of slavery and Jim Crow as well as the current issue of police officers shooting Black people like it’s negro open season. But, again, I don’t argue with them, I just quench my thirst on the bottomless open bar of white tears that they are perpetually kind enough to provide us with. (Also, I can’t take anything seriously coming from a white man whose first, middle and last names are really just three first names. It just gives off big James Earl Ray energy.)
“Guess what—all lives fucking matter. Black lives don’t fucking matter,” Miles can be heard saying in video footage of the incident because obviously, a bigot with three first names isn’t going to be smart enough not to string two sentences together that clearly contradict each other.
Miles damn near knocked the store’s automatic doors off the hinges while resisting the crowd that was trying to force his dumb ass out. But Klanneth McBlame-it-on-the-alcohol continued singing songs from the soundtrack of Wypipo Proverbs including No. 1 hits like, “Will Someone Please Think of the White Lives” and “Bitch, I Got a Black Friend.”
“What about goddamn brown lives matter? What about white lives matter? How about everybody else? Guess what—all you Black fucks are goddamn racist mother fuckers,” he can be heard saying before informing the crowd that he “has a goddamn Black kid in goddamn Georgia,” which he thinks proves he’s “not a racist mother fucker.”
Anyway, officials at Fort Jackson, where Miles is stationed, released a statement saying that the Department of Justice is investigating the incident and that the Richland County Sheriff’s Department has confirmed that Miles has been charged for his behavior.
According to Newsweek, Miles has been charged with aggravated breach of peace and trespassing.
As an update on the unfortunate incident that brought disrespect to @fortjackson our Army and the trust with the public we serve, please see below. 👇🏾 I will be transparent in the future with shareable information. The subject in this case was arrested. @PaulFunk2@TradocDCGpic.twitter.com/prihGao1Nv
— Fort Jackson Commanding General (@fortjacksoncg) April 14, 2021
Y’all, we have missed so much this past year—family reunions, brunches, concerts, the Met Gala, casual hookups (if you’re into that kinda thing—no judgments). I’ve now celebrated two birthdays in this damned panorama, so trust when I say I know of what I speak. As The Root’s resident beauty and fashion editor (among other roles), I can also express a genuine longing for the typically exhausting ritual that is Fashion Week, and two of the most Black woman-centric events of the year: the annual Essence Festival of Music and Culture and the Essence Black Women in Hollywood Awards. (Okay, I’m still awaiting my invite to the latter, but a girl can dream!)
That said, it set my fashion-loving heart aflutter today to see one that of the best to ever do it, the ingenue-icon we call Zendaya, paid homage to another Black female icon when she made an appearance at this week’s (mostly virtual) Black Women in Hollywood event....and we have longtime collaborator and “image architect” Law Roach to thank
“I’ve been waiting to share this look.....”, he captioned a post on Instagram, featuring Zendaya an ice-blue bubble-peplumed evening jacket and black skirt. “@zendaya wearing vintage @ysl Haute Couture from 1982 (my personal archive) originally owned by the trailblazer Eunice Johnson! We pay homage 🌹🌹🌹”In case you didn’t know, Eunice Johnson was the wife of Ebony magazine creator and publisher John H. Johnson and the founder and director of the legendary Ebony Fashion Fair, where the iconic Yves Saint Laurent-designed ensemble first appeared for the magazine’s 25th anniversary issue.
In case you didn’t know, Eunice Johnson was the wife of Ebony magazine creator and publisher John H. Johnson and the founder and director of the legendary Ebony Fashion Fair, where the iconic Yves Saint Laurent-designed ensemble first appeared for the magazine’s 25th anniversary issue.
Of course, the Chicago-born Roach would be familiar with the legacy of one of the city’s—and America’s most powerful Black women, and wisely procured this outfit for his own archive, only to bless his muse with it on the absolutely perfect occasion. And because Zendaya is as humble and conscious as she is stunning (case in point: her most recent IG posts are of Ma’Kiah Bryant and George and Gianna Floyd, rather than herself, the 2020 Emmy winner payed her honor forward, thanking Black women for inspiring her as she accepted her well-deserved award.
Does it make up for a hellish, and heart-wrenching week? Maybe not—but maybe it’s a small and stylish reminder that we’re here, we we see each other...and we are ever excellent.
Maiysha Kai is Managing Editor of The Glow Up, co-host of The Root Presents: It's Lit! podcast, and your average Grammy-nominated goddess next door...May I borrow some sugar?
CNN describes the significance to their arrival — and what the astronauts will do during their six-month stay in space:This mission, dubbed Crew-2, marks the third-ever crewed flight for Elon Musk's company and the first to make use of a previously flown, privately-owned rocket booster and spacecraft... On Saturday morning, the capsule slowly aligned itself and moved in to dock directly with one of the space station's ports.
A prime focus of the astronauts' mission will be research with "tissue chips," or "small models of human organs containing multiple cell types that behave much the same as they do in the body" and that NASA hopes will advance the development of drugs and vaccines, according to the space agency. That work will build on years of studying biological and other scientific phenomena aboard the ISS, where the microgravity environment can give scientists a better fundamental understanding of how something works.
Kimbrough, McArthur, Pesquet, and Hoshide joined seven astronauts already on board the station, four of whom arrived on a different SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule in November. That brings the space station's current total of personnel to 11 — one of the largest crews the ISS has ever hosted. But that number will quickly drop back down to seven when four of the astronauts who'd been on board hitch a ride home from the station on April 28.
Researchers have developed a tool that can design complex DNA robots and nanodevices in minutes instead of days. Phys.Org reports:In a paper published today in the journal Nature Materials, researchers from The Ohio State University -- led by former engineering doctoral student Chao-Min Huang -- unveiled new software they call MagicDNA. The software helps researchers design ways to take tiny strands of DNA and combine them into complex structures with parts like rotors and hinges that can move and complete a variety of tasks, including drug delivery. One advantage is that it allows researchers to carry out the entire design truly in 3-D. Earlier design tools only allowed creation in 2-D, forcing researchers to map their creations into 3-D. That meant designers couldn't make their devices too complex.
The software also allows designers to build DNA structures "bottom up" or "top down." In "bottom up" design, researchers take individual strands of DNA and decide how to organize them into the structure they want, which allows fine control over local device structure and properties. But they can also take a "top down" approach where they decide how their overall device needs to be shaped geometrically and then automate how the DNA strands are put together. Combining the two allows for increasing complexity of the overall geometry while maintaining precise control over individual component properties. Another key element of the software is that it allows simulations of how designed DNA devices would move and operate in the real world.
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Reuters:The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said that final rules announced in December took effect on Wednesday allowing for small drones to fly over people and at night, a significant step toward their eventual use for widespread commercial deliveries. The effective date was delayed about a month during the change in administration. The FAA said its long-awaited rules for the drones, also known as unmanned aerial vehicles, will address security concerns by requiring remote identification technology in most cases to enable their identification from the ground. Previously, small drone operations over people were limited to operations over people who were directly participating in the operation, located under a covered structure, or inside a stationary vehicle -- unless operators had obtained a waiver from the FAA.
Drone manufacturers have 18 months to begin producing drones with Remote ID, and operators will have an additional year to provide Remote ID. The new rules eliminate requirements that drones be connected to the internet to transmit location data but do require that they broadcast remote ID messages via radio frequency broadcast. One change, since the rules were first proposed in 2019, requires that small drones not have any exposed rotating parts that would lacerate human skin.
NASA successfully carried out a second flight on Mars on Thursday of its mini helicopter Ingenuity, a 52-second sortie that saw it climb to a height of 16 feet. Phys.Org reports:"So far, the engineering telemetry we have received and analyzed tell us that the flight met expectations," said Bob Balaram, Ingenuity's chief engineer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in southern California. "We have two flights of Mars under our belts, which means that there is still a lot to learn during this month of Ingenuity," Balaram said in a statement. The US space agency conducted the first flight of the four pound (1.8 kilogram) rotorcraft on Monday, the first powered flight ever on another planet. That time Ingenuity rose to a height of 10 feet and then touched down after 39.1 seconds.
For the second flight, which lasted 51.9 seconds, Ingenuity climbed to 16 feet, hovered briefly, tilted and then accelerated sideways for seven feet. "The helicopter came to a stop, hovered in place, and made turns to point its camera in different directions," said Havard Grip, Ingenuity's chief pilot. "Then it headed back to the center of the airfield to land. "It sounds simple, but there are many unknowns regarding how to fly a helicopter on Mars."
New Voices: Should we be more mindful of psychosis?
Carly Samson with the latest in our series for budding writers (see www.bps.org.uk/newvoices for more information)
How many times have you sat down to have a cup of tea or coffee, only to realise that you have finished it without even being aware that you drank it? We live in a culture where we feel we always need to be active, whether it is being immersed in technology and social media, reading up on the latest theory or rushing around in a desperate attempt to balance work and home life. Perhaps if we were more aware of the present moment, we might find it easier to concentrate, become more attuned to ourselves and others, and more resilient. Are we ‘mind full’ or ‘mindful’?
Mindfulness is an ancient Buddhist practice that involves ‘paying attention in a particular way, on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally’ (Kabat-Zinn, 1994), helping us become more aware of our thoughts and feelings, and managing them in a better way. It is about waking up to the present moment, reconnecting with ourselves, and appreciating the fullness of every moment. When we go on ‘autopilot’ to process our emotional experiences we can lose sight of them and become detached and disconnected from ourselves. Mindfulness techniques help people become more aware of the way they think and feel, and how their experiences impact on their emotions.
There is evidence that mindfulness practices can lead to reduced suffering and enhanced well-being (see Baer, 2003). Many of these techniques have been incorporated into well-researched treatment approaches for a range of mental and physical health difficulties, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT).
These approaches have been described as ‘third wave’ therapies because they go beyond first wave behavioural, and second wave cognitive-behavioural techniques that emphasise thoughts themselves. Instead, they focus on changing how people relate to their thoughts. Integrating ancient wisdom and modern science, mindfulness is emerging as a powerful evidence-based tool, shown to be effective in clinical settings to alleviate a variety of mental health problems and to improve psychological functioning (Baer, 2003).
Although mindfulness has become a commonly used approach in the treatment of less severe psychological problems, the feasibility and effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in the management of serious psychiatric disorders remains controversial (Segal et al., 2002). For example, teaching meditation to people who experience psychotic symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusional beliefs, has been discouraged, with some people arguing that deep states of absorption may be linked to the onset of hallucinations in people who are prone to psychosis (Yorston, 2001). However, these papers refer to single cases, lack experimental rigour and mostly refer to lengthy transcendental meditation practices. Modern therapeutic approaches consist of shorter breathing exercises and teach mindfulness as a ‘choiceless attention’ rather than a concentration meditation. There is increasing evidence that specially adapted mindfulness techniques can be used safely and effectively in the management and treatment of severe mental health problems, such as psychosis (Chadwick et al., 2005; Langer et al., 2012).
Psychotic disorders, such as schizophrenia, are often chronic conditions that cause considerable distress and functional impairment. People who experience psychotic phenomena such as auditory hallucinations often, although not always, find these symptoms greatly distressing. As a result, they may engage in avoidance strategies (such as suppression or distraction), or on the other extreme, can become engrossed in their symptoms (ruminating or confronting them). Both of these reactions are associated with increased distress in relation to psychotic symptoms (Badcock et al., 2011; Romme & Escher, 1993). However, strategies that include paying attention and acceptance are associated with reduced distress and greater ability to cope. For example, Romme & Escher (1989) found that the most effective coping strategies used by people who hear voices involved listening to them and accepting them, which was related to a more positive view of the self.
Therefore, mindfulness skills can provide these individuals with an alternative way of relating to their symptoms, moving from a judgemental and controlling stance to a more compassionate, accepting view. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based approaches for people with psychosis has been demonstrated in controlled clinical settings (Jacobsen et al., 2011) and in the community (Chadwick et al., 2009).
How does this mindful relationship with psychotic sensations unfold? Abba et al. (2008) argue that it’s a three-stage process:
I Learning to become more aware of psychotic experiences and observing the thoughts and emotions that follow them. I Allowing psychosis to come and go without reacting in order to cultivate understanding that distress is produced by the meanings one attaches to thoughts and sensations. I Reclaiming power by accepting psychosis and the self by acknowledging that the sensations only form part of the experience, and are not a definition of the self.
Through these processes, mindfulness practice reveals that judging, ruminating and struggling against psychotic experiences creates distress, while observation and acceptance of psychotic experience in the absence of judgement is empowering and calming. By relating mindfully to sensations by paying attention to emotional reactions, clients discover that thoughts, images and sensations are transient and temporary; that they are a product of the mind, rather than a part of the self. These techniques enable clients to understand that they have a choice in how they respond. This realisation can help them to break free of habitual reactions to these experiences (such as negative self-judgements), reducing distress associated with them.
However, the introduction of mindfulness can present a challenge to change-oriented cognitive and behavioural therapists, largely because of the acceptance-based nature of the techniques (Lau & McMain, 2005). There is no attempt to dispute dysfunctional cognitions, but to be non-judgemental and to accept thoughts, feelings and sensations as they are. Paul Chadwick has demonstrated that these approaches can be effectively combined in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for distressing psychosis (Chadwick et al., 2005). In MBCT, as well as being more aware of thought patterns, clients are encouraged to observe and accept their internal experiences, and how they influence thoughts and behaviour. Cognitive change appears to result from understanding that thoughts and feelings are temporary phenomena which will pass eventually, and embracing and cultivating an attitude of acceptance can enhance the therapeutic relationship, clients’ acceptance of self and others, and therapists’ acceptance of clients. In this way, acceptance strategies can lead to behavioural changes, and help the integration of two seemingly contrasting approaches, with promising outcomes.
There are also some exciting findings to suggest that mindfulness practice is associated with physical changes in the brain. Structural changes have been observed in the anterior cingulate cortex, which is an area of the brain associated with emotional regulation (Tang et al, 2012). These changes are associated with improvements in mood, which is consistent with emotional regulation being a core feature of many mental health problems, including psychosis. There is evidence to suggest that mindfulness practice is linked to reduced brain activity in the default mode network (Brewer et al., 2011). This network of brain areas is believed to be involved in rumination and mind wandering, which are common thought processes seen in people with mental health difficulties. Becoming more aware of the present moment through mindfulness practice is associated with a reduction in these mental states. Components of many psychiatric disorders, such as psychosis, are preoccupation with thoughts, rumination and poor emotional regulation, which mindfulness practice appears to affect. Neuroimaging studies are beginning to explain the neural mechanisms of how mindfulness might be working clinically.
A few years ago I was fortunate enough to work with a psychologist in a rehabilitation team who was running a mindfulness group. I was amazed to see how beneficial people found the techniques for coping with symptoms such as hallucinations and paranoia, and how much more prepared they felt upon discharge from the team. I am keen to continue this work, so currently I am investigating the effectiveness of mindfulness-based group therapy in an Early Intervention in Psychosis Service in London, helping people learn new ways of managing and living with their difficulties. I am also eager to extend my work to explore the neuroscience of mindfulness, particularly the link between mindfulness practice and structural and functional changes in the brain.
In sum, mindfulness is a new, powerful technique with a rapidly growing evidence base for reducing distress associated with a number of mental health problems. It can complement and enhance the effectiveness of existing psychological treatment approaches, and offer a way to develop insight, empathy and tolerance. As a worrier myself I am very aware of the impact of dwelling on negative thoughts and anticipating the worst! Learning about mindfulness has enhanced my personal and professional development, and it can help practitioners as well as clients value every moment and appreciate the richness of life.
Carly Samson is a Research Worker at the Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London carly.samson@kcl.ac.uk
References
Abba, N., Chadwick, P. & Stevenson, C. (2008). Responding mindfully to distressing psychosis. Psychotherapy Research, 18(1), 77–87. Badcock, J.C., Paulik, G. & Maybery, M.T. (2011). The role of emotion regulation in auditory hallucinations. Psychiatry Research, 185, 303–308. Baer, R.A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125–143. Brewer, J.A., Worhunsky, P.D., Gray, J.R. et al. (2011). Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(50), 20254–20259. Chadwick, P., Newman-Taylor, K. & Abba, N. (2005). Mindfulness groups for people with psychosis. Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy, 33, 351–359. Chadwick, P., Hughes, S., Russell., D. et al. (2009). Mindfulness groups for distressing voices and paranoia. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 403. Jacobsen, P., Morris, E., Johns, L. & Hodkinson, K. (2011). Mindfulness groups for psychosis: Key issues for implementation on an inpatient unit. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 39, 349–353 Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion. Langer, A.I., Cangas, A.J., Salcedo, E. & Fuentes, B. (2012). Applying mindfulness therapy in a group of psychotic individuals. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 40, 105–109. Lau, M.A. & McMain, S.F. (2005). Integrating mindfulness meditation with cognitive behavioural therapies. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 863–869. Romme, M.A.J. & Escher, A.D.M.A.C. (1989). Hearing voices. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15, 209–216. Romme, M. & Escher, S. (1993). Accepting voices. London: Mind Publications. Segal, Z.V., Williams, J.M. & Teasdale, J.D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. New York: Guilford Press. Tang, Y.Y., Lu, Q.L., Fan, M. et al. (2012). Mechanisms of white matter changes induced by meditation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(26), 10570–10574. Yorston, G. (2001). Mania precipitated by meditation. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 4, 209–213.
The closest star to Earth is Proxima Centauri. It is about 4.25 light-years away, or about 25 trillion miles (40 trillion km). The fastest ever spacecraft, the now- in-space Parker Solar Probe will reach a top speed of 450,000 mph. It would take just 20 seconds to go from Los Angeles to New York City at that speed, but it would take the solar probe about 6,633 years to reach Earth’s nearest neighboring solar system.
If humanity ever wants to travel easily between stars, people will need to go faster than light. But so far, faster-than-light travel is possible only in science fiction.
In Issac Asimov’s Foundation series, humanity can travel from planet to planet, star to star or across the universe using jump drives. As a kid, I read as many of those stories as I could get my hands on. I am now a theoretical physicist and study nanotechnology, but I am still fascinated by the ways humanity could one day travel in space.
Some characters – like the astronauts in the movies “Interstellar” and “Thor” – use wormholes to travel between solar systems in seconds. Another approach – familiar to “Star Trek” fans – is warp drive technology. Warp drives are theoretically possible if still far-fetched technology. Two recent papers made headlines in March when researchers claimed to have overcome one of the many challenges that stand between the theory of warp drives and reality.
But how do these theoretical warp drives really work? And will humans be making the jump to warp speed anytime soon?
Compression and expansion
Physicists’ current understanding of spacetime comes from Albert Einstein’s theory of General Relativity. General Relativity states that space and time are fused and that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. General relativity also describes how mass and energy warp spacetime – hefty objects like stars and black holes curve spacetime around them. This curvature is what you feel as gravity and why many spacefaring heroes worry about “getting stuck in” or “falling into” a gravity well. Early science fiction writers John Campbell and Asimov saw this warping as a way to skirt the speed limit.
What if a starship could compress space in front of it while expanding spacetime behind it? “Star Trek” took this idea and named it the warp drive.
In 1994, Miguel Alcubierre, a Mexican theoretical physicist, showed that compressing spacetime in front of the spaceship while expanding it behind was mathematically possible within the laws of General Relativity. So, what does that mean? Imagine the distance between two points is 10 meters (33 feet). If you are standing at point A and can travel one meter per second, it would take 10 seconds to get to point B. However, let’s say you could somehow compress the space between you and point B so that the interval is now just one meter. Then, moving through spacetime at your maximum speed of one meter per second, you would be able to reach point B in about one second. In theory, this approach does not contradict the laws of relativity since you are not moving faster than light in the space around you. Alcubierre showed that the warp drive from “Star Trek” was in fact theoretically possible.
Proxima Centauri here we come, right? Unfortunately, Alcubierre’s method of compressing spacetime had one problem: it requires negative energy or negative mass.
A negative energy problem
Alcubierre’s warp drive would work by creating a bubble of flat spacetime around the spaceship and curving spacetime around that bubble to reduce distances. The warp drive would require either negative mass – a theorized type of matter – or a ring of negative energy density to work. Physicists have never observed negative mass, so that leaves negative energy as the only option.
To create negative energy, a warp drive would use a huge amount of mass to create an imbalance between particles and antiparticles. For example, if an electron and an antielectron appear near the warp drive, one of the particles would get trapped by the mass and this results in an imbalance. This imbalance results in negative energy density. Alcubierre’s warp drive would use this negative energy to create the spacetime bubble.
But for a warp drive to generate enough negative energy, you would need a lot of matter. Alcubierre estimated that a warp drive with a 100-meter bubble would require the mass of the entire visible universe.
In 1999, physicist Chris Van Den Broeck showed that expanding the volume inside the bubble but keeping the surface area constant would reduce the energy requirements significantly, to just about the mass of the sun. A significant improvement, but still far beyond all practical possibilities.
Bobrick and Martire realized that by modifying spacetime within the bubble in a certain way, they could remove the need to use negative energy. This solution, though, does not produce a warp drive that can go faster than light.
[Over 100,000 readers rely on The Conversation’s newsletter to understand the world.Sign up today.]
Independently, Lentz also proposed a solution that does not require negative energy. He used a different geometric approach to solve the equations of General Relativity, and by doing so, he found that a warp drive wouldn’t need to use negative energy. Lentz’s solution would allow the bubble to travel faster than the speed of light.
It is essential to point out that these exciting developments are mathematical models. As a physicist, I won’t fully trust models until we have experimental proof. Yet, the science of warp drives is coming into view. As a science fiction fan, I welcome all this innovative thinking. In the words of Captain Picard, things are only impossible until they are not.
- Bloggery committed by chris tower - 2104.24 - 10:10
- Days ago = 2122 days ago
- New note - On 1807.06, I ceased daily transmission of my Hey Mom feature after three years of daily conversations. I plan to continue Hey Mom posts at least twice per week but will continue to post the days since ("Days Ago") count on my blog each day. The blog entry numbering in the title has changed to reflect total Sense of Doubt posts since I began the blog on 0705.04, which include Hey Mom posts, Daily Bowie posts, and Sense of Doubt posts. Hey Mom posts will still be numbered sequentially. New Hey Mom posts will use the same format as all the other Hey Mom posts; all other posts will feature this format seen here.
No comments:
Post a Comment